Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Learning a novel pattern through balanced and skewed input*

  • KIM MCDONOUGH (a1) and PAVEL TROFIMOVICH (a1)

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of balanced and skewed input at facilitating the acquisition of the transitive construction in Esperanto, characterized by the accusative suffix -n and variable word order (SVO, OVS). Thai university students (N = 98) listened to 24 sentences under skewed (one noun with high token frequency) or balanced (equally-low token frequency) presentation following either inductive (rule not given) or deductive (rule given) instructions. In the testing phase, they heard 20 sentences (10 SVO, 10 OVS) with new nouns and identified the object. Only the group that received balanced input and deductive instructions detected the novel pattern.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Kim McDonough, Department of Education, Concordia University (LB-579), 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montréal, Québec, CanadaH3G 1M8Kim.McDonough@concordia.ca

Footnotes

Hide All
*

This study was supported by a standard research grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We are grateful to Amélie Bissonnette and Teresa Hernández-González for their help with creating study materials and to Adele Goldberg and anonymous BLC reviewers for their helpful input and feedback on the content of this manuscript.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language, 82, 711733.
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In Robinson & Ellis (eds.), pp. 216–236.
Casenhiser, D. M., & Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8, 500508.
Cox, G. (2011). The international auxiliary language Esperanto grammar and commentary (4th edn.). London: British Esperanto Association Incorporated. [Project Guttenberg ebook: http://www.archive.org/stream/theinternational35815gut/35815-0.txt]
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, pp. 4263. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 313348. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 124.
Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164194.
Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In Robinson & Ellis (eds.), pp. 372–405.
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2010). The bounds of adult language acquisition: Blocking and learned attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 553580.
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2011). Learned attention on adult second language acquisition: A replication and meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 589624.
Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 87, 242260.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2009). The nature of generalization in language. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 93127.
Goldberg, A. E., & Casenhiser, D. M. (2008). Construction learning and second language acquisition. In Robinson & Ellis (eds.), pp. 197–215.
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289316.
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & White, T. (2007). Constructions as categories of language. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 7086.
Haight, C., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P. (2007). The effects of inductive and deductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 288311.
Harlow, D. (1995). The sixteen rules of Esperanto grammar. http://donh.best.vwh.net/Esperanto/rules.html (retrieved April 18, 2011).
Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). Acquiring grammar structures by guided induction. The French Review, 65, 708718.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd edn.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
MacWhinney, B. (2008). A unified model. In Robinson & Ellis (eds.), pp. 341–371.
McDonough, K., & Nekrasova-Becker, T. (in press). Comparing the effect of skewed and balanced input on EFL learners’ comprehension of the double-object dative construction. Applied Psycholinguistics.
Nakamura, D. (2012). Input skewedness, consistency, and order of frequent verbs in frequency-driven second language construction learning: A replication and extension of Casenhiser and Goldberg (2005) to adult second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL), 50, 3167.
Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 2777.
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511556.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Westport, CT: Ablex.
Vogel, S., Herron, C., Cole, S., & York, H. (2011). Effectiveness of a guided inductive versus a deductive approach on the learning of grammar in the intermediate-level college French classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 353380.
Year, J., & Gordon, P. (2009). Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 399417.
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed