Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The effects of script variation, literacy skills, and immersion experience on executive attention: A comparison of matched monoscriptal and biscriptal bilinguals

  • SUJIN YANG (a1), HWAJIN YANG (a2) and ANDREE HARTANTO (a2)

Abstract

To examine script effects, monoscriptal Spanish–English (SE) bilinguals, who use two similar Roman alphabetic systems, were compared to biscriptal Chinese–English (CE) bilinguals, who use logographs and Roman alphabets. On the Attention Network Test, script effects were most evident in global processing efficiency (i.e., inverse efficiency and reaction time) and in the local network of executive control in favor of biscriptal CE bilinguals over matched monoscriptal SE counterparts. Literacy effects were found on the executive control network among Chinese–English bilinguals of high L1-literacy skills over their script- and immersion-matched counterparts, who varied only in low L1 literacy. In a similar vein, results of the multiple regression analysis demonstrated that script and literacy are significant predictors of executive control capacities. Our results suggest that script variation in a bilingual's language pair is an important modulating factor that enhances overall attention efficiency.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Sujin Yang, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea, Postal Code: 03760sy98@cornell.edu

Footnotes

Hide All

This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea Grant (NRF-2016-S1A3A295502). The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study, interpretation of the data, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Abutalebi, J., Guidi, L., Borsa, V., Canini, M., Della Rosa, P. A., Parris, B. A., & Weekes, B. S. (2015). Bilingualism provides a neural reserve for aging populations. Neuropsychologia, 69, 201210.
Ang, I., & Stratton, J. (1995). The Singapore way of multiculturalism: Western concepts/Asian cultures. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 10, 6589.
Armstrong, R. A. (2014). When to use the Bonferoni correction. Ophthalmic & Psychological Optics, 34, 502508.
Bell, N. L., Lassiter, K. S., Matthews, T. D., & Hutchinson, M. B. (2001). Comparison of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third edition and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third edition with university students. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 417422.
Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 313.
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., Peets, K. F., & Yang, S. (2010). Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (4), 525531.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F.I.M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 240250.
Briggs, P., & Goryo, K. (1988). Biscriptal interference: A study of English and Japanese. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 515531.
Coderre, E.L., & van Heuven, W.J.B. (2014). The effect of script similarity on executive control in bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.
Davidse, N. J., Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2013). Explaining common variance shared by early numeracy and literacy. Reading and Writing, 27, 631648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9465-0
De Souza, D. (1980). The politics of language: Language planning in Singapore. In Afendras, E.A. and Kuo, E.C.Y. (eds.) Language and Society in Singapore, pp. 203232, Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Fan, J., McCandliss, B.D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M.I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340347.
Folke, T., Ouzia, J., Bright, P., De Martino, B., & Filippi, R. (2016). A bilingual disadvantage in metacognitive processing, Cognition, 150, 119132.
Friesen, D.C., Luo, L., Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2015). Proficiency and control in verbal fluency performance across the lifespan for monolinguals and bilinguals. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30, 238250.
Gathercole, V.C.M., & Thomas, E.M. (2009). Bilingual first-language development: Dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 213237.
Gopinathan, S. (1998). Language policy changes 1979–1997: Politics and pedagogy. In Gopinathan, S., Pakir, Anne, Ho, Wah Kam & Saravanan, Vanithamani (Eds), Language, society and education in Singapore, 2nd edition (pp. 1944). Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Gray, J.R., Chabris, C.F., & Braver, T.S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6 (3), 316322.
Green, D. W., Rickard Liow, S., Tng, S. K., & Zielinski, S. (1996). Are visual search procedures adapted to the nature of the scripts? British Journal of Psychology, 87, 311326.
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexicosemantic system. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 1 (02), 6781.
Grosjean, F. (2016). The Complementarity Principle and its impact on processing, acquisition, and dominance. In Silva-Corvalán, Carmen & Treffers-Daller, Jeanine (eds), Language Dominance in Bilinguals: Issues of Measurement and Operationalization. pp. 3365. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hartanto, A., & Yang, H. (2016a). Disparate bilingual experiences modulate task-switching advantages: A diffusion model analysis of the effects of compound bilingualism on switch costs. Cognition, 150, 1019.
Hartanto, A., & Yang, H. (2016b). Does Active Bilingualism enhance Inhibitory Control and Monitoring?: A Propensity Matching Analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Singapore Management University.
Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, CA: Erlbaum.
Jia, G., Aaronson, D., & Wu, Y. (2002). Long-term language attainment of bilingual immigrants: Predictive variables and language group differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 599621.
Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). Reading in different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 6784). Amsterdam: New Holland.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-II. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S.C., Misra, M., & Guo, T. (2008). Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta Psychologica, 128, 416430.
Kroll, J. F., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25 (5), 497514.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 555.
Ma, W., & Li, G. (2016). Chinese-heritage students in north American schools: Understanding hearts and minds beyond test scores. Routledge: New York.
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within-and betweenlanguage competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6 (2), 97115.
McBride, C.A. (2016). Is Chinese special? Four aspects of Chinese literacy acquisition that might distinguish learning Chinese from learning alphabetic orthographies. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 523549.
Paap, K. R., Darrow, J., Dalibar, C., & Johnson, H. A. (2014). Effects of script similarity on bilingual advantages in executive control are likely to be negligible or null. Frontiers in Psychology, 5
Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2015). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 69, 265278.
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 232258.
Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., Gottardo, A., & Geva, E. (2015). Cross-language transfer of word reading accuracy and word reading fluency in Spanish–English and Chinese–English bilinguals: Script-universal and script-specific processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 96110.
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 2542.
Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2011). Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish–English and Mandarin–English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 682691.
Redick, T.S., & Engle, R.W. (2006). Working memory capacity and attention network test performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 713721.
Rhodes, N., & Pufahl, I. (2011). Foreign language instruction in US schools: Results of a national survey of elementary and secondary schools. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 258288.
Rueda, M.R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B.D., Halparin, J.D., Gruber, D.B., Lercari, L.P., & Posner, M.I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 10291040.
Streiner, D.L., & Norman, G.R. (2011). Correction for multiple testing: Is there a resolution? Chest, 140: 1618.
Sullivan, M. D., Janus, M., Moreno, S., Astheimer, L., & Bialystok, E. (2014). Early stage second-language learning improves executive control: Evidence from ERP. Brain and Language, 139, 8498.
Sun-Alperin, M.K., & Wang, M. (2011). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24, 591614.
Tan, C. (2006). Change and continuity: Chinese language policy in Singapore. Language Policy, 5, 4162.
Tan, L. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., Spinks, J. A., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. Neuroimage, 13, 836846.
Tao, L., Marzecová, A., Taft, M., Asanowicz, D., & Wodniecka, Z. (2011). The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: The role of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 123, 119.
Tavassoli, N. T. (2002). Spatial memory for Chinese and English. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 415431.
Valian, V. (2015). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 324
Verreyt, N., Woumans, E., Vandelanotte, D., Szmalec, A., & Duyck, W. (2016). The influence of language-switching experience on the bilingual executive control advantage. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 181190.
Wang, M., Park, Y., & Lee, K.R. (2006). Korean–English biliteracy acquisition: Cross-language phonological and orthographic transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 148158.
Wang, M., Perfetti, C.A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition; Cross-language and writing system transfer, Cognition, 97, 6788.
Xie, Z., & Dong, Y. (2015). Contributions of bilingualism and public speaking training to cognitive control differences among young adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 114. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000474
Yang, S., & Lust, B. (2007). Cross-linguistic differences in cognitive effects due to bilingualism: experimental study of lexicon and executive attention in 2 typologically distinct language groups. BUCLD 31 Proceedings (pp. 602703). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Yang, H., Hartanto, A., & Yang, S. (2016). The importance of bilingual experience in assessing bilingual advantages in executive functions. Cortex, 75, 237240.
Yang, H., & Yang, S. (2015). Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000632
Yow, W.Q., & Li, X. (2015). Balanced bilingualism and early age of second language acquisition as the underlying mechanisms of a bilingual executive control advantage: Why variations in bilingual experiences matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 164 . doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00164.
Zhou, B., & Krott, A. (2016). Data trimming procedure can eliminate bilingual cognitive advantage. Psychological Bulletin Review, 23, 12211230.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed