Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The bilingual advantage in the Stroop task: simultaneous vs. early bilinguals*

  • LAURA SABOURIN (a1) and SANTA VĪNERTE (a1)

Abstract

The Stroop task has become a popular paradigm in investigations of bilingual cognitive control. While several studies show a cognitive control advantage for bilinguals, recent studies have countered these findings. The present study investigates two factors that may account for conflicting results: participant grouping and task difficulty. While we find no differences between simultaneous and early bilinguals (age groups traditionally both classified as “early” bilinguals) when the task uses only one language, we find a significant difference between the two when languages are mixed. We suggest treating the two groups as distinct, and note the importance of the bilingual context.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Laura Sabourin, Linguistics Department, University of Ottawa, 70 Laurier Ave. E. Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada Laura.Sabourin@uottawa.ca

Footnotes

Hide All
*

We would like to thank Sameer Ratti, Yu Ying Li and Natalie Ho for their help with testing participants. We further thank all members of the Brain and Language Lab for discussions during the setting up and implementing of this research. We also thank Greg Poarch and one anonymous reviewer for comments on an earlier version of this paper. This research was supported by a SSHRC grant to the first author.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 (4), 859873.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16 (4), 240250.
Brown, J. D. (1980). Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests. The Modern Language Journal, 64 (3), 311317.
Coderre, E. L., Van Heuven, W.J.B., & Conklin, K. (2013). The timing and magnitude of Stroop interfernce and facilitation in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (2), 420441.
Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J.L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97 (3), 332361.
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids in conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 5986.
Green, D.W. (2011). Language control in different contexts: the behavioral ecology of bilinguals speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:103, 14.
Green, D.W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: the adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25 (5), 515530.
Heidlmayr, K., Moutier, S., Hemforth, B., Courin, C., Tanzmeister, R., & Isel, F. (2014). Successive bilingualism and executive functions: The effect of second language use on inhibitory control in a behavioural Stroop Colour Word task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (3), 630645.
Hilchey, M.D., & Klein, R.M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 625658.
Kousaie, S., & Phillips, N.A. (2012). Aging and bilingualism: Absence of a “bilingual advantage” in Stroop interference in a nonimmigrant sample. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65 (2), 356369.
Kroll, J.F., Bobb, S.C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9 (2), 119135.
MacLeod, C.M. (1991). Half a century of research in the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109 (2), 163203.
MacLeod, C.M., & MacDonald, P.A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (10), 383391.
Marian, V. & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6 (2), 97115.
Marzecová, A., Asanowicz, D., Krivá, L., & Wodniecka, Z. (2013). The effects of bilingualism on efficiency and lateralization of attentional networks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (3), 608623.
Paap, K.R., & Greenberg, Z.I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66 (2), 232258.
Sabourin, L. and members of the ERPLing Laboratory. (2009). Language Background Questionnaire. Unpublished Document, ERPLing Laboratory.
Sabourin, L., Brien, C., & Burkholder, M. (2014). The effect of age of L2 acquisition on the organization of the bilingual lexicon: Evidence from masked priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (3), 542555.
Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643662.
Tao, L., Marzecová, A., Taft, M., Asanowicz, D., & Wodniecka, Z. (2011). The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: The role of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 119.
Tremblay, A. (2011). Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research: “Clozing” the gap. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 339372.
Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Leiser, D. (1990). Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 760771.
Wu, Y.J., & Thierry, G. (2013). Fast modulation of executive function by language context in bilinguals. Journal of Neuroscience, 33 (33), 1353313537.
Zied, K.M., Philippe, A., Pinon, K., Havet-Thomassin, V., Ghislaine, A., Roy, A., & Le Gall, D. (2004). Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: Evidence from a bilingual Stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 54, 254256.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed