Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:51:27.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Let's walk before we can run: the uncertain demand from policymakers for trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2020

PETER JOHN
PETER JOHN*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Economy, King's College London, London, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Department of Political Economy, King's College London, London, UK. E-mail: peter.john@kcl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Al-Ubaydli et al. set out a valuable prospectus, but they operate with too simple a view of the policymaking process. Politicians and bureaucrats have additional objectives to that of maximizing human welfare: the former wish to endorse policies that get them re-elected; the latter need to manage complex bureaucracies and advance their careers. Both need to be persuaded that trials are in their long-term interests to adopt. Because Al-Ubaydli et al.'s proposals may increase the costs of doing trials, the demand for robust evidence might reduce rather than increase.

Type
Articles
Information
Behavioural Public Policy , Volume 5 , Special Issue 1: Field Experiments and Public Policy , January 2021 , pp. 112 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Flinders, M. (2013), ‘The Tyranny of Relevance and the Art of Translation’, Political Studies Review, 11(2): 149–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. (2016), Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference, Random House.Google Scholar
John, P. (2013), ‘Political Science, Impact and Evidence’, Political Studies Review, 11(2): 168–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, P. (2017), Field Experiments in Political Science and Public Policy: Practical Lessons in Design and Delivery, Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, P. (2018), How Far to Nudge?: Assessing Behavioural Public Policy, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlan, D. and Appel, J.. (2016), Failing in the Field: What We Can Learn When Field Research Goes Wrong, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (1984), Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Lin, W. and Green, D. P.. (2016), ‘Standard Operating Procedures: A Safety Net for Pre-Analysis Plans’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(3): 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516000810.Google Scholar
Miguel, E., Camerer, C., Casey, K., Cohen, J., Esterling, K. M., Gerber, A., Glennerster, R., et al. (2014), ‘Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research’, Science, 343(6166): 30–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, Wolfgang C. & Strøm, K.. (1999), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheffer, L., Loewen, P. J., Soroka, S., Walgrave, S. and Sheafer, T.. (2018), ‘Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians’, American Political Science Review, 112(2): 302–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, C. H. (1977), Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, Vol. 11. Lexington Books Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
Weiss, Carol H (1979), ‘The Many Meanings of Research Utilization’, Public Administration Review, 39(5): 426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, C. H. (1998), ‘Have We Learned Anything New about the Use of Evaluation?’ American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1): 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, M. (2014), ‘Bridging the Relevance Gap in Political Science’, Politics, 34(3): 275–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar