Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T00:23:54.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“NOW I KNOW IT COULD HAPPEN, I HAVE TO PREVENT IT”: A CLINICAL STUDY OF THE SPECIFICITY OF INTRUSIVE THOUGHTS AND THE DECISION TO PREVENT HARM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2000

Abigail L. Wroe
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, U.K.
Paul M. Salkovskis
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, U.K.
H. Candida Richards
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, U.K.

Abstract

This study uses semi-structured interviews with obsessionals and nonclinical controls to investigate the frequency with which these individuals experience intrusions about possible harm and the frequency with which they then act to prevent that possible harm. The findings suggest that obsessionals do not generally experience more frequent intrusions about possible harm than do nonobsessionals, but that obsessionals more frequently experience intrusions in specific situations: obsession-relevant situations and situations they find most problematic. There was found to be a generalized difference between obsessionals and nonobsessionals in terms of frequency of actions taken to prevent potential harm following intrusions in situations that are obsession-relevant and obsession-irrelevant. The findings suggest that the occurrence of intrusions is just one factor influencing obsessional behaviour.

Type
Clinical Section
Copyright
© 2000 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.