Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence

  • William R. Miller (a1) and Gary S. Rose (a2)

Abstract

Background: A recommendation in original descriptions of motivational interviewing (MI) was to “explore ambivalence”. Contrasting procedures for doing so have been clarified through the evolution of MI. Aims: This article describes two conceptually distinct methods for responding to ambivalence: decisional balance (DB) and MI's evocation of change talk, and reviews empirical evidence to recommend when each procedure is appropriate (and inappropriate) in clinical practice. Method: The authors summarize findings of clinical outcome research to examine how these two interventions impact the resolution of client ambivalence. Results: With ambivalent people, a DB intervention tends to decrease commitment to change, whereas evocation (a key element of MI) promotes change. When a person has already made the decision to change, evocation is unnecessary and may deter change, whereas DB may further strengthen commitment. Conclusions: DB is an appropriate procedure when the clinician wishes to maintain neutrality and not favor the resolution of ambivalence in any particular direction. Evocation is appropriate when the clinician intends to help clients resolve ambivalence in the direction of change.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Reprint requests to William R. Miller, The University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale SE MSC11-6280 Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA. E-mail: wrmiller@unm.edu

References

Hide All
Adams, M. A., Norman, G. J., Hovell, M. F., Sallis, J. F. and Patrick, K. (2009). Reconceptualizing decisional balance in an adolescent sun protection intervention: mediating effects and theoretical interpretations. Health Psychology, 28, 217225.
Amrhein, P. C., Miller, W. R., Yahne, C. E., Palmer, M. and Fulcher, L. (2003). Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 862878.
Babor, T. F. and Del Boca, F. K. (Eds.). (2003). Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Burke, B. L., Dunn, C. W., Atkins, D. C. and Phelps, J. S. (2004). The emerging evidence base for motivational interviewing: a meta-analytic and qualitative inquiry. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 18, 309322.
Carey, K. B., Carey, M. P., Henson, J. M., Maisto, S. A. and DeMartini, K. S. (2011). Brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students: comparison of face-to-face counseling and computer-delivered interventions. Addiction, 106, 528537.
Carey, K. B., Carey, M. P., Maisto, S. A. and Henson, J. M. (2006). Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 943954.
Carey, K. B., Henson, J. M., Carey, M. P. and Maisto, S. A. (2009). Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 7487.
Carey, K. B., Maisto, S. A., Carey, M. P. and Purnine, D. M. (2001). Measuring readiness-to-change substance misuse among psychiatric outpatients: I. reliability and validity of self-report measures. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 7988.
Carey, K. B., Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J., Elliott, J. C., Garey, L. and Carey, M. P. (2012). Face-to-face versus computer-delivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: a meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 690703.
Collins, S. E., and Carey, K. B. (2005). Lack of effect for decisional balance as a brief motivational intervention for at-risk college drinkers. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 14251430.
Colten, M. E. and Janis, I. L. (1981). Effects of moderate self-disclosure and the balance-sheet procedure. In Janis, I. L. (Ed.), Counseling on Personal Decisions (pp. 159171). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pusuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227268.
Dew, M. A., Zuckoff, A., DiMartini, A. F., Dabbs, A. J. D., McNulty, M. L., Fox, K. R., et al. (2012). Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing. Progress in Transplantation, 22, 280293.
DiClemente, C. C. and Velasquez, M. M. (2002). Motivational Interviewing and the stages of change. In Miller, W. R. and Rollnick, S. (Eds.), Motivational Interviewing: preparing people for change. (2nd ed., pp. 201216). New York: Guilford Press.
Franklin, B. (1772). Moral or prudential algebra: letter to Joseph Priestly (September 19). The Writings of Benjamin Franklin (Vol. 3: London17571775).
Gaume, J., Bertholet, N., Faouzi, M., Gmel, G. and Daeppen, J. B. (2010). Counselor motivational interviewing skills and young adult change talk articulation during brief motivational interventions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 39, 272281.
Geller, K. S., Mendoza, I. D., Timbobolan, J., Montjoy, H. L. and Nigg, C. R. (2011). The decisional balance sheet to promote healthy behavior among ethnically diverse older adults. Public Health Nursing, 29, 241246.
Glynn, L. H. and Moyers, T. B. (2010). Chasing change talk: the clinician's role in evoking client language about change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 39, 6570.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In Higgins, E. T. and Sorrentino, R.M. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 5392). New York: Guilford Press.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (2011). Mindset theory of action phases. In P. Lange, Van, Kruglanski, A. W. and Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 526546). London: Sage Publications.
Hettema, J., Steele, J. and Miller, W. R. (2005). Motivational interviewing. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 91111.
Hoyt, M. F. and Janis, I. L. (1975). Increasing adherence to a stressful decision via a motivational balance-sheet procedure: a field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 833839.
Janis, I. L. (1959). Decisional conflicts: a theoretical analysis. Conflict Resolution, 3, 627.
Janis, I. L. and Mann, L. (1976). Coping with decisional conflict. American Scientist, 64, 657666.
Janis, I. L. and Mann, L. (1977). Decision Making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free Press.
Labrie, J. W., Pederson, E. R., Earleywine, M. and Olsen, H. (2006). Reducing heavy drinking in college males with the decisional balance: analyzing an element of motivational interviewing. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 254263.
Labrie, J. W., Pederson, E. R., Thompson, A. D. and Olsen, H. (2008). A brief decisional balance intervention increases motivation and behavior regarding condom use in high-risk heterosexual college men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 330339.
Longabaugh, R. and Wirtz, P. W. (Eds.) (2001). Project MATCH Hypotheses: results and causal chain analyses (Vol. Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 8). Bethesda, MA: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
Lundahl, B. and Burke, B. L. (2009). The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 12321245.
Lundahl, B. W., Kunz, C., Brownell, C., Tollefson, D. and Burke, B. L. (2010). A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing: twenty-five years of empirical studies. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 137160.
Ma, J., Betts, N. M., Horacek, T., Geoorgiou, C., White, A. and Nitzke, S. (2002). The importance of decisional balance and self-efficacy in relation to stages of change for fruit and vegetable intakes by young adults. American Journal of Health Promotion, 16, 157166.
Magill, M., Stout, R. L. and Apodaca, T. R. (2013). Therapist focus on ambivalence and commitment: a longitudinal analysis of motivational interviewing treatment ingredients. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 754762.
Matzger, H., Kaskutas, L. A. and Weisner, C. (2005). Reasons for drinking less and their relationship to sustained remission from problem drinking. Addiction, 100, 16371646.
Miller, B. M., Leffingwell, T. R., Claiborn, K., Meier, E., Walters, S. and Neighbors, C. (in press). Personalized feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: an update of Walters and Neighbors (2005). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.
Miller, W. R. (1983). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 11, 147172.
Miller, W. R. (1994). Motivational interviewing: III. on the ethics of motivational intervention. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 22, 111123.
Miller, W. R., Benefield, R. G. and Tonigan, J. S. (1993). Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: a controlled comparison of two therapist styles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 455461.
Miller, W. R. and Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational Interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R. and Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R. and Rollnick, S. (2009). Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 129140.
Miller, W. R. and Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: helping people change (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R. and Rose, G. S. (2009). Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. American Psychologist, 64, 527537.
Miller, W. R. and Wilbourne, P. L. (2002). Mesa grande: a methodological analysis of clinical trials of treatment for alcohol use disorders. Addiction, 97, 265277.
Miller, W. R., Wilbourne, P. L. and Hettema, J. (2003). What works? A summary of alcohol treatment outcome research. In Hester, R. K. and Miller, W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Alcoholism Treatment Approaches: effective alternatives (3rd ed.) (pp. 1363). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Mills, J. (1999). Improving the 1957 version of dissonance theory. In Harmon-Jones, E. and Mills, J. (Eds.), Cognitive Dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
Moyers, T. B. and Martin, T. (2006). Therapist influence on client language during motivational interviewing sessions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30, 245252.
Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Christopher, P. J., Houck, J. M., Tonigan, J. S. and Amrhein, P. C. (2007). Client language as a mediator of motivational interviewing efficacy: where is the evidence? Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31 (Supplement), 40S47S.
Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Houck, J. M., Christopher, P. J. and Tonigan, J. S. (2009). From in-session behaviors to drinking outcomes: a causal chain for motivational interviewing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 11131124.
Nenkov, G. Y. and Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). Pre- versus postdecisional deliberation and goal commitment: the positive effects of defensiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 106121.
Nigg, C. R., Courneya, K. S. and Estabrooks, P. A. (1997). Maintaining attendance at a fitness center: an application of the decision balance sheet. Behavioral Medicine, 23, 130137.
O'Connell, D. and Velicer, W. F. (1988). A decisional balance measure and the stages of change model for weight loss. The International Journal of the Addictions, 23, 729750.
Prochaska, J. O. (1994). Strong and weak principles for progressing from precontemplation to action on the basis of twelve problem behaviors. Health Psychology, 13, 4751.
Prochaska, J. O. and DiClemente, C. C. (1984). The Transtheoretical Approach: crossing traditional boundaries of therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow/Jones Irwin.
Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., Rossi, J. S., Goldstein, M. G., Marcus, B. H., Rakowski, W., et al. (1994). Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology, 13, 3946.
Project MATCH Research Group (1997). Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses. Addiction, 92, 16711698.
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In Koch, S. (Ed.), Psychology: the study of a science. Vol. 3. Formulations of the person and the social contexts (pp. 184256). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rohsenow, D. J., Monti, P. M., Martin, R. A., Colby, S. M., Myers, M. G., Gulliver, S. B., et al. (2004). Motivational enhancement and coping skills training. Addiction, 99, 862874.
Rubak, S., Sandbaek, A., Lauritzen, T. and Christensen, B. (2005). Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of General Practice, 55, 305312.
Schumann, A., Meyer, C., Rumpf, H.-J., Hannover, W., Hapke, U. and John, U. (2005). Stage of change transitions and processes of change: decisional balance and self-efficacy in smokers: a transtheoretical model validation using longitudinal data. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 39.
Sellman, J. D., Sullivan, P. F., Dore, G. M., Adamson, S. J. and MacEwan, I. (2001). A randomized controlled trial of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) for mild to moderate alcohol dependence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 389396.
Sobell, M. B. and Sobell, L. C. (1993). Problem Drinkers: a guided self-change treatment. New York: Guilford Press.
Stotts, A. L., Schmitz, J. M., Rhoades, H. M. and Grabowski, J. (2001). Motivational interviewing with cocaine-dependent patients: a pilot study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 858862.
Truax, C. B. (1966). Reinforcement and non-reinforcement in Rogerian psychotherapy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 19.
Velicer, W. F., DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O. and Brandenburg, N. (1985). Decisional balance measure for assessing and predictingsmoking status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 12791289.

Keywords

Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence

  • William R. Miller (a1) and Gary S. Rose (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Motivational Interviewing and Decisional Balance: Contrasting Responses to Client Ambivalence

  • William R. Miller (a1) and Gary S. Rose (a2)
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *