Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Effects of Appraisals of Anomalous Experience on Distress in People at Risk of Psychosis

  • Hannah E. Taylor (a1), Sophie Parker (a2), Warren Mansell (a1) and Anthony P. Morrison (a3)

Abstract

Background: A cognitive model of psychosis suggests that appraisals of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs), and the subsequent responses adopted, are responsible for the maintenance of distress and disability associated with psychosis. Aims: This study aimed to investigate whether it is possible to manipulate appraisals of an anomalous experience in people at risk of psychosis and whether this affects levels of distress. Method: Participants who had experienced an “at risk mental state” (ARMS) within the past year, were randomized to one of two groups and received either negative or neutral information pertaining to an anomalous experience (a card trick). Participants completed a questionnaire measuring PLEs, then completed pre and post measures of distress and anxiety in relation to the card trick. Participants were also asked to rate a series of psychotic or non-psychotic appraisals regarding how they thought the card trick worked. Results: Data analysis revealed that distress and anxiety were not related to the information group assigned (our experimental manipulation was unsuccessful). However, when analyzed as one group, higher conviction in non-psychotic appraisals was found to be related to lower levels of distress and state anxiety. Conclusions: The findings provide some validation for a relationship between appraisals and distress. Clinical implications, methodological limitations and possible future research directions are discussed.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Reprint requests to Hannah Taylor, 2nd Floor Zochonis Building, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: hannahelizabeth.taylor@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Bentall, R. P. (2003). Madness Explained: psychosis and human nature. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Brett, C. M. C., Johns, L. C., Peters, E. P. and McGuire, P. K. (2009). The role of metacognitive beliefs in determining the impact of anomalous experiences: a comparison of help-seeking and non-help-seeking groups of people experiencing psychotic-like anomalies. Psychological Medicine, 39, 939950.
Brett, C. M. C., Peters, E. P., Johns, L. C., Tabraham, P., Valmaggia, L. R. and McGuire, P. K. (2007). Appraisals of Anomalous Experiences Interview (AANEX): a multidimensional measure of psychological responses to anomalies associated with psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, s23s30.
Foa, E. B., Grayson, J. B. and Steketee, G. (1982). Depression, habituation and treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsives. In Boulougouris, J. C. (Ed.), Practical Applications of Learning Theories in Psychiatry (pp.129141). New York: Wiley.
Freeman, D., Pugh, K., Antley, A., Slater, M., Bebbington, P., Gittins, M., et al. (2008). Virtual reality study of paranoid thinking in the general population. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 258263.
Garety, P. A., Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., Freeman, D. and Bebbington, P. E. (2001). A cognitive model of the positive symptoms of psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 31, 189195.
Linney, Y. M. and Peters, E. R. (2007). The psychological processes underlying symptoms of thought interference in psychosis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 27262741.
McGlashan, T. H., Zipursky, R. B., Perkins, D., Addington, J., Miller, T., Woods, S. W., et al. (2006). Randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 790799.
McGorry, P. D., Yung, A. R., Phillips, L. J., Yuen, H. P., Francey, S., Cosgrave, E. M., et al. (2002). Randomized controlled trial of interventions designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 921928.
Morrison, A. P. (2001). The interpretation of intrusions in psychosis: an integrative cognitive approach to hallucinations and delusions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 257276.
Morrison, A. P. (2005). A normalizing approach to cognitive therapy for intrusive obsessional and psychotic phenomena: the case of Sam. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 12, 384389.
Morrison, A. P., French, P., Lewis, S. W., Roberts, M., Raja, S., Neil, S. T., et al. (2006). Psychological factors in people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: comparisons with non-patients and associations with symptoms. Psychological Medicine, 36, 13951404.
Morrison, A. P., French, P., Walford, L., Lewis, S. W., Kilcommons, A., Green, J., et al. (2004). Cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at ultra-high risk: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 291297.
Morrison, A. P., French, P. and Wells, A. (2007). Metacognitive beliefs across the continuum of psychosis: comparisons between patients with psychotic disorders, patients at ultra-high risk and non-patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 22412246.
Morrison, A. P., Renton, J. C., Dunn, H., Williams, S. and Bentall, R. P. (2004). Cognitive Therapy for Psychosis: a formulation-based approach. London: Brunner-Routledge.
Phillips, L. J., Yung, A. R. and McGorry, P. D. (2000). Identification of young people at risk of psychosis: validation of Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic intake criteria. [10.1046/j.1440-1614.2000.00798.x]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, S164S169.
Speilberger, C. D., Gorusch, R. L., Lushene, R. E., Vagg, P. R. and Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Stefanis, N. C., Hanssen, M., Smirnis, N. K., Avramopoulos, D. A., Evdokimidis, I. K., Stefanis, C. N., et al. (2002). Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 32, 347358.
Yung, A., McGorry, P. D., McFarlane, C. A., Jackson, H., Patton, G. C. and Rakkar, A. (1996). Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 283303.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Effects of Appraisals of Anomalous Experience on Distress in People at Risk of Psychosis

  • Hannah E. Taylor (a1), Sophie Parker (a2), Warren Mansell (a1) and Anthony P. Morrison (a3)
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *