Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Wasserman, Gerald S.
1991.
Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
165.
Bailar, John C.
1991.
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
1991.
Reflections from the peer review mirror.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
167.
Cone, John D.
1991.
Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
142.
Mahoney, Michael J.
1991.
Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
157.
Kraemer, Helena Chmura
1991.
Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
152.
Kiesler, Charles A.
1991.
Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
151.
Marsh, Herbert W.
and
Ball, Samuel
1991.
Reflections on the peer review process.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
157.
Stricker, Lawrence J.
1991.
Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
163.
Fletcher, Jack M.
1991.
Journal availability and the quality of published research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
146.
Laming, Donald
1991.
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
154.
Cohen, Patricia
1991.
Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
139.
Eckberg, Douglas Lee
1991.
When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
145.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
1991.
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.
Nelson, Linda D.
1991.
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
158.
Fuller, Steve
1991.
Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
147.
Salzinger, Kurt
1991.
Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
162.
Rourke, Byron P.
1991.
Toward openness and fairness in the review process.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
161.
Hargens, Lowell L.
1991.
Referee agreement in context.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
150.
Bornstein, Robert F.
1991.
The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
138.