Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

What and where is the word?

  • Catherine McBride-Chang (a1), Hsuan-Chih Chen (a1), Benjawan Kasisopa (a2), Denis Burnham (a2), Ronan Reilly (a2) (a3) and Paavo Leppänen (a4)...

Abstract

Examples from Chinese, Thai, and Finnish illustrate why researchers cannot always be confident about the precise nature of the word unit. Understanding ambiguities regarding where a word begins and ends, and how to model word recognition when many derivations of a word are possible, is essential for universal theories of reading applied to both developing and expert readers.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aram, D. & Levin, I. (2001) Mother–child joint writing in low SES: Sociocultural factors, maternal mediation, and emergent literacy. Cognitive Development 16:831–52.
Aram, D. & Levin, I. (2004) The role of maternal mediation of writing to kindergartners in promoting literacy in school: A longitudinal perspective. Reading and Writing 17:387409.
Aroonmanakun, W. (2002) Collocation and Thai word segmentation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Natural Language Processing and the Fifth Oriental COCOSDA (International Committee for the Coordination and Standardization of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques) Workshop, ed. Theeramunkong, T. & Sornlertlamvanich, V., pp. 6875. Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology.
Aroonmanakun, W. (2007) Thoughts on word and sentence segmentation in Thai. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Natural language Processing, Pattaya, Thailand, December 13–15, 2007, ed. Kawtrakul, A. & Zock, M., pp. 8590. Kasetsart University.
Chen, H.-C. & Shu, H. (2001) Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8:511–18.
Chen, H.-C., Song, H., Lau, W. Y., Wong, E. & Tang, S. L. (2003) Developmental characteristics of eye movements in reading Chinese. In: Reading development in Chinese children, ed. McBride-Chang, C. & Chen, H.-C., pp. 157–69. Praeger.
Grainger, J. & Ziegler, J. (2011) A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology 2:54. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054. (Web journal, online publication).
Hirsimäki, T., Creutz, M., Siivola, V., Kurimo, M., Virpioja, S. & Pylkkönen, J. (2006) Unlimited vocabulary speech recognition with morph language models applied to Finnish. Computer Speech and Language 20(4):515–41.
Kasisopa, B., Reilly, R. & Burnham, D. (2010) Orthographic factors in reading Thai: An eye tracking study. In: Proceedings of the Fourth China International Conference on Eye Movements (CICEM), Tianjin, China, May 24–26, 2010, ed. Shen, D., Bai, X., Yan, G. & Rayner, K.. p. 8. Tianjin Normal University.
Lin, D., McBride-Chang, C., Aram, D., Levin, I., Cheung, R. Y. M. & Chow, Y. Y.-Y. (2009) Maternal mediation of writing in Chinese children. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(7–8):1286–311.
Lin, D., McBride-Chang, C., Aram, D., Shu, H., Levin, I. & Cho, J.-R. (2012) Maternal mediation of word writing in Chinese across Hong Kong and Beijing. Journal of Educational Psychology 104:121–37.
Liu, P. D., Chung, K. K. H., McBride-Chang, C. & Tong, X. (2010) Holistic versus analytic processing: Evidence for a different approach to processing of Chinese at the word and character levels in Chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 107:466–78.
Niemi, J., Laine, M. & Tuominen, J. (1994) Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes 9(3):423–46.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C. & Zorzi, M. (2010) Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology 61:106–51.
Tsang, Y.-K. & Chen, H.-C. (2010) Morphemic ambiguity resolution in Chinese: Activation of the subordinate meaning with a prior dominant-biased context. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 17:875–81.
Wong, A. W. K. & Chen, H.-C. (in press) Is syntactic-category processing obligatory in visual word recognition? Evidence from Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.603931.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed