Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust

  • Kyle Mahowald (a1), Ariel James (a2), Richard Futrell (a1) and Edward Gibson (a1)

Abstract

Branigan & Pickering (B&P) claim that the success of structural priming as a method should “end the current reliance on acceptability judgments.” Structural priming is an interesting and useful phenomenon, but we are dubious that the effect is powerful enough to test many detailed claims about specific points of syntactic theory.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bock, K. & Loebell, H. (1990) Framing sentences. Cognition 35(1):139. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-I.
Flett, S. (2006) A comparison of syntactic representation and processing in first and second language production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Mahowald, K., James, A., Futrell, R. & Gibson, E. (2016b) A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 91:527. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009.
Wittenberg, E. (2014) With light verb constructions from syntax to concepts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Potsdam.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed