Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:40:06.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rules and rote: Beyond the linguistic either-or fallacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1999

Robert Schreuder ,
Nivja de Jong ,
Andrea Krott  and
Harald Baayen
Robert Schreuder
Affiliation:
Interfaculty Research Unit for Language and Speech, University of Nijmegen, 6521XL Nijmegen, The Netherlandsschreude@mpi.nl
Nivja de Jong
Affiliation:
Interfaculty Research Unit for Language and Speech, University of Nijmegen, 6521XL Nijmegen, The Netherlandsschreude@mpi.nl
Andrea Krott
Affiliation:
Interfaculty Research Unit for Language and Speech, University of Nijmegen, 6521XL Nijmegen, The Netherlandsschreude@mpi.nl
Harald Baayen
Affiliation:
Interfaculty Research Unit for Language and Speech, University of Nijmegen, 6521XL Nijmegen, The Netherlandsschreude@mpi.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report an experiment that unambiguously shows an effect of full-form frequency for fully regular Dutch inflected verbs falling into Clahsen's “default” category, negating Clahsen's claim that regular complex words in the default category are not stored.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 6 , December 1999 , pp. 1038 - 1039
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)