Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:25:05.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is empirical imagination a constraint on adaptationist theory construction?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2003

Thomas E. Dickins  and
David W. Dickins
Thomas E. Dickins
Affiliation:
Brain and Cognition Research Group, Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4BU, United Kingdomthomas.dickins@ntu.ac.uk http://ess.ntu.ac.uk/Dickins
David W. Dickins
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZU, United Kingdomdickins@liverpool.ac.uk http://www.liv.ac.uk/Psychology/DeptInfo/StaffProfile/DDickins.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Andrews et al. present a form of instrumental adaptationism that is designed to test the hypothesis that a given trait is an adaptation. This epistemological commitment aims to make clear statements about behavioural natural kinds. The instrumental logic is sound, but it is the limits of our empirical imagination that can cause problems for theory construction.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , August 2002 , pp. 515 - 516
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)