Article contents
A dim monocular view of Universal-Grammar access
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2010
Abstract
This target article's handling of theory and data and the range of evidence surveyed for its main contention fall short of normal BBS standards. However, the contention itself is reasonable and can be supported if one rejects the “knowledge” metaphor for linguistic competence and accepts that “syntactic principles” are no more than the way the brain does language.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996
References
- 1
- Cited by