Skip to main content Accessibility help

Converging on a theory of language through multiple methods

  • Mónica González-Márquez (a1), Michele I. Feist (a2) and Liane Ströbel (a1)


Assuming that linguistic representation has been studied only by linguists using grammaticality judgments, Branigan & Pickering (B&P) present structural priming as a novel alternative. We show that their assumptions are incorrect for cognitive-functional linguistics, exposing converging perspectives on form/meaning pairings between generativists and cognitive-functional linguists that we hope will spark the cross-disciplinary discussion necessary to produce a cognitively plausible model of linguistic representation.



Hide All
Bergen, B. & Coulson, S. (2006) Frame-shifting humor in simulation-based language understanding. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(2):5962.
Bybee, J. L. (1994) A view of phonology from a cognitive and functional perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 5(4):285305.
Bybee, J. L. & Moder, C. L. (1983) Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59:251–89.
Coulson, S. & Van Petten, C. (2002) Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition 30:958–68.
Croft, W. & Poole, K. T. (2008) Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34:137.
Dąbrowska, E. (2014) Words that go together: Measuring individual differences in native speakers' knowledge of collocations. The Mental Lexicon 9(3):401–18.
Divjak, D. S. & Arppe, A. (2013) Extracting prototypes from exemplars What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics 24(2):221–74.
Feist, M. I. (2008) Space between languages. Cognitive Science 32(7):1177–99.
Feist, M. I. (2010) Inside in and on: Typological and psycholinguistic perspectives. In: Language, Cognition, and Space, ed. Evans, V. & Chilton, P., pp. 95114. Equinox.
Feist, M. I. (2013) Codability and cost in the naming of motion events. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 7(3):4561.
Feist, M. I. & Duffy, S. E. (2015) Moving beyond “Next Wednesday”: The interplay of lexical semantics and constructional meaning in an ambiguous metaphoric statement. Cognitive Linguistics 26(4):633–56.
Fillmore, C. J. (1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 280:2032.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P. & O'Connor, M. C. (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 64(3):501–38.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5):219–24. Available at:
Haspelmath, M. (2008) Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19:133.
Heim, I. & Kratzer, A. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell.
Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T., Ardell, D. & Spivey, M. J. (2014) Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Frontiers in Psychology 5:410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00410.
Jackendoff, R. (2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1990) The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1):3974.
Levinson, S. C. & Meira, S. (2003) “Natural concepts” in the spatial topological domain – Adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology. Language 79:485516.
Liu, N. & Bergen, B. (2016) When do language comprehenders mentally simulate locations? Cognitive Linguistics 27(2):181203.
Lupyan, G. (2012) Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Cognition 3(54):113. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054.
Lupyan, G. & Casasanto, D. (2015) Meaningless words promote meaningful categorization. Language and Cognition 7(2):167–93.
Núñez, R. & Sweetser, E. (2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30(3):401–50.
Perry, L. & Lupyan, G. (2014) The role of language in multi-dimensional categorization: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation and exposure to verbal labels. Brain and Language 135:6672.
Saj, A., Fuhrman, O., Vuilleumier, P. & Boroditsky, L. (2014) Patients with left spatial neglect also neglect the “left side” of time. Psychological Science 25(1):207–14.
Schiffer, S. (2015) Meaning and formal semantics in generative grammar. Erkenntnis 80(1):6187.
Spivey, M. & González-Márquez, M. (2003) Rescuing generative linguistics: Too little, too late? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26(06):690–1.
Spivey, M., Richardson, D. & Gonzalez-Marquez, M. (2004) On the perceptual-motor and image-schematic underpinnings of real-time language processing. In: The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking, ed. Zwaan, R. & Pecher, D., pp. 246–81. Cambridge University Press.
Ströbel, L., ed. (2016) Sensory-motor concepts in language & cognition. Duesseldorf University Press.
Tomasello, M. (1998) The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 1. Erlbaum.
Tomasello, M. (2003b) The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2. Erlbaum.
Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Plante, E., Rubin, S. & Parks, M. (1999) Timecourse of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25(2):394417.
Walker, E., Bergen, B. & Núñez, R. (2013) Investigating spatial axis recruitment in temporal reckoning through acoustic stimuli and non-spatial responses. Center for Research in Language Technical Report, University of California, San Diego 25:110.
Winawer, J., Huk, A. & Boroditsky, L. (2008) A motion aftereffect from still photographs depicting motion. Psychological Science 19(3):276–83.
Winter, B. & Matlock, T. (2013) Making judgments based on similarity and proximity. Metaphor & Symbol 28:114.
Yoon, J. & Gries, S. Th., eds. (2016) Corpus-based approaches to construction grammar. John Benjamins.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Converging on a theory of language through multiple methods

  • Mónica González-Márquez (a1), Michele I. Feist (a2) and Liane Ströbel (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.