Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:52:11.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consistent preferences, conflicting reasons, and rational evaluations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2022

Francesco Guala Open the ORCID record for Francesco Guala [Opens in a new window]
Francesco Guala*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Milan, 20122 Milano, Italy francesco.guala@unimi.ithttp://users.unimi.it/guala/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bermúdez's arguments in favour of the rationality of quasi-cyclical preferences conflate reasons, desires, emotions, and responses with genuine preferences. Rational preference formation requires that the decision-makers not only identify reasons, but also weigh them in a coherent way.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e229
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angner, E. (2018). What preferences really are. Philosophy of Science, 85(4), 660–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (2011). Preference, value, choice, and welfare. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar