Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The brain is not an isolated “black box,” nor is its goal to become one

  • Tom Froese (a1) (a2) and Takashi Ikegami (a2)

Abstract

In important ways, Clark's “hierarchical prediction machine” (HPM) approach parallels the research agenda we have been pursuing. Nevertheless, we remain unconvinced that the HPM offers the best clue yet to the shape of a unified science of mind and action. The apparent convergence of research interests is offset by a profound divergence of theoretical starting points and ideal goals.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ashby, W. R. (1940) Adaptiveness and equilibrium. The British Journal of Psychiatry 86:478–83.
Beer, R. D. (2000) Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(3):9199.
Di Paolo, E. A. (2009) Extended life. Topoi 28(1):921.
Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M. & De Jaegher, H. (2010) Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In: Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science, ed. Stewart, J., Gapenne, O. & Di Paolo, E. A., pp. 3387. MIT Press.
Friston, K. (2009) The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(7):293301.
Friston, K. J. (2010) The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(2):127–38.
Friston, K. & Stephan, K. (2007) Free energy and the brain. Synthese 159(3):417–58.
Froese, T. & Di Paolo, E. A. (2011) The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics and Cognition 19(1):136.
Froese, T. & Stewart, J. (2010) Life after Ashby: Ultrastability and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 17(4):83106.
Froese, T. & Ziemke, T. (2009) Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind. Artificial Intelligence 173(3–4):366500.
Gershman, S. J. & Daw, N. D. (2012) Perception, action and utility: The tangled skein. In: Principles of brain dynamics: Global state interactions, ed. Rabinovich, M. I., Friston, K. J. & Varona, P., pp. 293312. MIT Press.
Ikegami, T. (2007) Simulating active perception and mental imagery with embodied chaotic itinerancy. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14(7):111–25.
Noë, A. (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press.
Noë, A. (2009) Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. Farrar, Straus and Giroux/Hill and Wang.
Varela, F. J. (1999) The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science, ed. Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B. & Roy, J.-M., pp. 266317. Stanford University Press.
Varela, F. J., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E. & Martinerie, J. (2001) The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2:229–39.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed