Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T20:28:18.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animal metacognition? It's all in the methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2004

Sara J. Shettleworth  and
Jennifer E. Sutton
Sara J. Shettleworth*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canadahttp://psych.utoronto.ca/~shettle/http://psych.utoronto.ca/~sutton/
Jennifer E. Sutton*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canadahttp://psych.utoronto.ca/~shettle/http://psych.utoronto.ca/~sutton/
*
shettle@psych.utoronto.ca
sutton@psych.utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

When animals choose between completing a cognitive task and “escaping,” proper interpretation of their behavior depends crucially on methodological details, including how forced and freely chosen tests are mixed and whether appropriate transfer tests are administered. But no matter how rigorous the test, it is impossible to go beyond functional similarity between human and nonhuman behaviors to certainty about human-like consciousness.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , June 2003 , pp. 353 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)