Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:32:28.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Positivity versus negativity is a matter of timing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

George Ainslie*
Affiliation:
School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7710, South Africa. Department of Veterans Affairs, Coatesville, PA 19320. George.Ainslie@va.govwww.picoeconomics.org

Abstract

“Negative” emotions are never purely negative. They attract attention at the very least and often stay attractive enough to make rehearsing them an addictive activity. As the authors point out, they also counteract a relentless tendency for positive emotions to become boring. Analysis in terms of reward suggests why this tendency occurs and how symbiosis with negative emotions may arise, in art and in life.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainslie, G. (2005) Précis of breakdown of will. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(5):635–73.Google Scholar
Ainslie, G. (2013) Money as MacGuffin: A factor in gambling and other process addictions. In: Addiction and self-control: Perspectives from philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience, ed. Levy, N., pp. 1637. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ainslie, G. (2017) De gustibus disputare: Hyperbolic delay discounting integrates five approaches to choice. Journal of Economic Methodology 24(2):166–89.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989) Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. (1969) Method and theory in the study of avoidance. Psychological Review 76:4969.Google Scholar
Irvine, I. (1999) Acedia, tristitia and sloth: Early Christian forerunners to chronic ennui. Humanitas 12(1):89.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S. & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006) Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger's influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19:115–37.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1970) The enmity between generations and its probable ethological causes. Psychoanalytic Review 57:333–77.Google Scholar
Rhue, J. W. & Lynn, S. J. (1987) Fantasy proneness: The ability to hallucinate “as real as real.” British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis 4:173–80.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. (1978) Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 26:201–36.Google ScholarPubMed