Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T03:38:57.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introspection, confabulation, and dual-process theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Affiliation:
Centre for Thinking and Language, School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom. j.evans@plymouth.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This excellent target article helps to resolve a problem for dual-process theories of higher cognition. Theorists posit two systems, one of which appears to be conscious and volitional. It seems to control some behaviours but to confabulate explanations for others. I argue that this system is only conscious in an illusory sense and that all self-explanations are confabulatory, as Carruthers suggests.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 142 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrade, J. (2001) The contribution of working memory to conscious experience. In: Working memory in perspective, ed. Andrade, J., pp. 60–79. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2006) The architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenbaum, N. J. & Cohen, N. J. (2001) From conditioning to conscious reflection: Memory systems of the brain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1980) Thinking: Experiential and information processing approaches. In: Cognitive psychology: New directions, ed. Claxton, G., pp. 275–99. Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989) Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59:255–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2009) How many dual-process theories do we need: One, two or many? In: In two minds: Dual processes and beyond, ed. Evans, J. St. B. T. & Frankish, K., p. 33–54. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T. & Over, D. (1996) Rationality and reasoning. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R. & DeCoster, J. (2000) Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4:108–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wason, P. C. & Evans, J. St. B. T. (1975) Dual processes in reasoning? Cognition 3:141–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar