Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:43:30.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

For public policies, our evolved psychology is the problem and the solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

Nicolas Baumard
Nicolas Baumard*
Affiliation:
Institut d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75230 Paris, France. nbaumard@gmail.comhttps://sites.google.com/site/nicolasbaumard/Home
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the authors, evolutionary approaches should rely less on evolutionary psychology, which studies innate fixed capacities, and more on cultural selection, which emphasizes cultural learning and symbolic innovation. However, successful policies do not seem to culturally reengineer people. Rather, they work by tapping into old human instincts (fairness preference, reputation management, resource seeking) to motivate individuals to change their behaviors.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , August 2014 , pp. 418 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumard, N. (2010) Has punishment played a role in the evolution of cooperation? A critical review. Mind and Society 9(2):171–92.Google Scholar
Baumard, N. (in preparation) Why psychology matters for human development: Human nature as a constraint and a lever in policy design. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/nicolasbaumard/Home.Google Scholar
Baumard, N., André, J. B. & Sperber, D. (2013) A mutualistic approach to morality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(1):59–122.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S. & Richerson, P. (2003) The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100(6):3531–35.Google Scholar
Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E. (2003) Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior 24(3):153–72.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Cantu, S. & Van Vugt, M. (2012) The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: Implications for marketing, policy, and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 31(1):115–28.Google Scholar
Guala, F. (2012) Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(1):1–59.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008) Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1971) Evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35–57.Google Scholar