Article contents
Detecting deception
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 March 1997
Abstract
I find three major shortcomings in Mele's account. First, verbal ambiguities suggest that the analysis is irrelevant to self-deception and/or that the traditional conception is subtly reinstated. Second, the data offer no means of establishing the superiority of the present account. Finally, as political rhetoric, Mele's proposal not only operates to disqualify others, but establishes science as their judge.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © 1997 Cambridge University Press
- 1
- Cited by