Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:03:20.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

10,000 Just so stories can't all be wrong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2010

Gary F. Marcus
Gary F. Marcus
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10012. gary.marcus@nyu.eduhttp://www.psych.nyu.edu/gary/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mere fact that a particular aspect of mind could offer an adaptive advantage is not enough to show that that property was in fact shaped by that adaptive advantage. Although it is possible that the tendency towards positive illusion is an evolved misbelief, it it also possible that positive illusions could be a by-product of a broader, flawed cognitive mechanism that itself was shaped by accidents of evolutionary inertia.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 6 , December 2009 , pp. 529
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kunda, Z. (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108(3):480–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, C. G., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. R. (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(11):2098–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F. (2008) Kluge: The haphazard construction of the human mind. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F. (2009) How does the mind work? Insights from biology. Topics in Cognitive Science 1:145–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2:175–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar