Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:54:30.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spirituality and Environmental Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Keith Skamp
Keith Skamp*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Work and Training, University of New England, Northern Rivers NSW
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Environmental education in Australian schools is generally becoming recognised as education for the environment, as distinct from but usually including education ‘about’ and education ‘in’ the environment (Greenall, 1987). This means that students of environmental education will be encouraged to develop an attitude of caring for the Earth (including the biosphere) and its resources, and to participate actively in maintaining and improving the quality of their environment. What encourages students (and ourselves) to move actively towards these goals?

The desire to ‘act’, it will be argued, comes from within ourselves. Until recently taking action for the environment has been seen as the top of a hierarchy of environmental education objectives. It has been assumed that an awareness of environmental problems leads to the acquisition of knowledge, which contributes to the development of attitudes and values and a feeling of concern for the environment, which then prompts one to take positive actions for the environment (see for example, Carin and Sund, 1985, p.88). However more recent research has attempted to formulate theoretical models identifying the factors (and their possible causal connections) which result in individuals taking responsible environmental action. Hines et al., (1988), for example, hypothesised that personality factors (such as one's ‘locus of concern’), knowledge of issues and action strategies, and action skills were positively correlated with taking responsible environmental action. The causal connections are problematic however and Iozzi(1988) concluded that simply being aware of environmental concerns and knowledgeable about them does not automatically lead to taking action for the environment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 7 , January 1991 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birch, C.On Purpose, New South Wales University Press, Kensington, 1990a.Google Scholar
Birch, C. “Process theology”, Eremos Newsletter, No. 31, 1990b, pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
Bradley, I.God is Green, Darton, Longman & Todd, London, 1990.Google Scholar
Bryant, C.The River Within, Darton, Longman & Todd, London, 1978.Google Scholar
Capra, F.The Turning Point, Fontana, London, 1985.Google Scholar
Carin, A.A. & Sund, R.B.Teaching Science Through Discovery, Merrill, Columbus, 5th Edn., 1985.Google Scholar
Fensham, P.J. ‘Environmental education A Tbilisi benchmark’, in Department of Arts, Heritage and Environment, Environmental education- Past, Present and Future (Proceedings of the Third National Environmental Education Seminar), AGPS, Canberra, cited in Greenall, A. “A political history of environmental education in Australia: snakes and ladders” in Robottom. I. (ed). Environmental Education: Practice and Possibility, Deakin University Press, Geelong, 1987.Google Scholar
Gleick, J.Chaos, Cardinal Books, London, 1987.Google Scholar
Greenall, A. “A political history of environmental education in Australia: snakes and ladders” in Robottom, I. (ed). Environmental Education: Practice and Possibility, Deakin University Press, Geelong, 1987.Google Scholar
Greig, S., Selby, D. & Pike, G.Earthrights, Kogan Page, London, 1987.Google Scholar
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R. & Tomera, A.N. “Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behaviour: a meta analysis”, Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1986/1987, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingleson, J. “On Purpose” Eremos Newsletter, No. 31, 1990, pp.24–26.Google Scholar
Iozzi, L. A. “Part One: Environmental education and the affective domain”, Journal of Environmental Education, 20(3), 1989, pp. 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelock, J.The Ages of Gaia, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
McDonagh, S.To Care for the Earth, Chapman, London, 1986.Google Scholar
(Sr.) Michaela, C.S.Cl. Towards an Australian Spirituality, Occasional Essay Supplement,Eremos Newsletter, 09, 1987, 15pp.Google Scholar
Nolan, R. “Restoring the broken connections”, Eremos Newsletter, No.30, 1990, pp.4–10.Google Scholar
NSW Department of Education. Environmental Education Curriculum Statement K-12, NSW Department of Education, Sydney, 1989.Google Scholar
NSW Department of Education. Aims of Primary Education in NSW, NSW Department of Education, Sydney, 1977.Google Scholar
Scott Peck, M.The Road Less Travelled, Rider, London, 1978.Google Scholar
Selby, D. & Pike, G.Global Teacher, Global Learner, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1989.Google Scholar