Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T05:30:50.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution or Revolution in EE/SE Research? A Collaborative Dialogue From First-Year PhD Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2016

Kim Beasy ,
Leah Page ,
Sherridan Emery  and
Ian Ayre
Kim Beasy*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Leah Page
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Sherridan Emery
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Ian Ayre
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Kim Beasy, PhD Candidate, Locked Bag 1365, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Newnham, LauncestonTAS 7248, Australia. Email Kim.Beasy@utas.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The AAEE 2014 research symposium in Hobart provided a privileged space for researchers and practitioners within environmental education and sustainability education (EE/SE) to come together and create dialogues about education for sustainability research. This essay is a critical reflection from postgraduate researchers about the symposium and the EE/SE research landscape more broadly. The authors interrogate contemporary research frameworks and practices, and deliberate on how current perceptions enable and inhibit performance within EE/SE research. The authors ask provocative questions and encourage readers to imagine for themselves what a new research landscape, freed of calcified frameworks and entrenched systems, might look like. The essay then draws on an ecological systems perspective as a means of reimagining EE/SE research within a more emergent landscape that values inclusivity, democracy, collaborative inquiry and curiosity.

Keywords

discourseenvironmental educationknowledgesustainabilitysystemsecology
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 32 , Issue 1: 18th AAEE Biennial Conference - Sustainability, Smart Strategies for the 21st Century , March 2016 , pp. 11 - 16
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, G., & Baguley, M. (2014). Learning through story: A collaborative, multimodal arts approach. English Teaching: Practice & Critique (University of Waikato), 13, 93–112.Google Scholar
Biesta, G.J. (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won't work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 491–503. doi:10.1007/s11217-010-9191-xGoogle Scholar
Dadds, M. (2002). Taking curiosity seriously: The role of awe and wanda in research-based professionalism. Educational Action Research, 10, 9–26. doi:10.1080/09650790200200170Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Flor, P., De Meulemeester, A., Allen, T., & Isaksson, K. (2013). Use of the fishbowl method for a discussion with a large group. Journal of the European Association for Health Information and Libraries, 9, 24–25.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2002). The subject and power. In Faubion, J.D. (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault: 1954–1984: Vol. 3 (pp. 326–348). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gough, N. (2006). Shaking the tree, making a rhizome: Towards a nomadic geophilosophy of science education. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 38, 625–645. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00216.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D.G. (1992). Emergent behaviour in biological systems. In Green, D.G. & Bossomaier, T.J. (Eds.), Complex systems — From biology to computation (pp. 25–36). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Gruenewald, D.A. (2004). A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education: Toward the socioecological challenge of the Earth Charter. Curriculum Inquiry, 34, 71–107.Google Scholar
Jain, S., Aggarwal, P., Sharma, N., & Sharma, P. (2013). Fostering sustainability through education, research and practice: a case study of TERI University. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 20–24. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.021Google Scholar
Le Grange, L.L.L. (2011). Sustainability and higher education: From arborescent to rhizomatic thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 742–754. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00503.xGoogle Scholar
Nind, M., & Vinha, H. (2014). Doing research inclusively: Bridges to multiple possibilities in inclusive research. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 102–109 108p. doi:10.1111/bld.12013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, E. (2015). Capitalism's toxic assumptions: Redefining next generation economics. Retrieved from http://UTAS.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1938195Google Scholar
Salter, Z., Venville, G., & Longnecker, N. (2011). An Australian story: School sustainability education in the lucky country. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27, 149–159.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B. (2007). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. Environmental Education Research, 13, 139–153. doi:10.1080/13504620701295726Google Scholar
St.Pierre, E.A. (2014, November–December). Post qualitative inquiry. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Research in Education, New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
University of Tasmania and Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education. (2013) Curious Schools Project. Retrieved from http://www.utas.edu.au/education/curious-schoolsGoogle Scholar