Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:56:19.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Theory of Insurance Risk Premiums—A Re-Examination in the Light of Recent Developments in Capital Market Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Yehuda Kahane
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The premium calculation principle is one of the main objectives of study for actuaries. There seems to be full agreement among the leading theoreticians in the field that the insurance premium should reflect both the expected claims and certain loadings. This is true for policy, risk or portfolio. There are three types of positive loadings: a) a loading to cover commissions, administrative costs and claim-settlement expenses; b) a loading to cover some profit (a cost-plus approach); and c) a loading for the risk taken by the insurer when underwriting the policy. The administrative costs can be considered a part of “expected gross claims”. Thus, the insurer's ratemaking decision depends on his ability to estimate expected claims (including costs) and on the selection of a fair risk loading.

The main concern in the literature is the appropriate measurement of the risk and the exact loading formula. Bühlmann [1970, ch. 5] and others identified four possible principles of risk loading, namely, the expected value principle, the standard deviation loading, the variance loading, and the loading according to the principle of constant utility. Various studies point to the advantages and disadvantages of these principles and also examine some additional loading forms—semi-variance, skewness, etc. (e.g., Bühlmann [1970], Benktander [1971], Berger [1972], Burness [1972], Berliner [1974], Berliner and Benktander [1976], Bohman [1976], Cooper [1974], Gerber [1975] and others). Despite different preferences in choosing the appropriate loading calculation principle, all seem to agree that the risk loading must be positive, since, otherwise, the firm would just have to wait for its ruin, that is bound to come sooner or later, according to risk theory.

The purpose of this article is to re-examine the appropriate principle of premium calculation in light of the recent developments in the theory of finance and especially in the theory of capital market equilibrium. These developments may suggest a new point of view and raise a few questions regarding the loading rules.

Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , March 1979 , pp. 223 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1979

References

REFERENCES

Beard, R. E., Pentikainen, T., and Pesonen, E. (1969). Risk Theory, Methuen & Co., London.Google Scholar
Beaver, W., Kettler, P., and Scholes, M. (1970). The Association between Market-Determined and Accounting-Determined Risk Measures, Accounting Review, 654–682.Google Scholar
Beaver, W. and Manegold, J. (1975). The Association Between Market-Determined and Accounting-Determined Measures of Systematic Risk: Some Further Evidence, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 10, 231–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benktander, G. (1971). Some Aspects of Reinsurance Profits and Loadings, The ASTIN Bulletin, 5, 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, G. (1972). An Attempt on the Subject: Profit Goal and Security Loadings in Risk Insurance, Transactions of the 19th International Congress of Actuaries, 4, 595–603.Google Scholar
Berliner, B. (1974). Some Thoughts on (Re) insurance Loadings under a Ruin Criterion, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2, 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, B. (1977). A Risk Measure Alternative to the Variance, The ASTIN Bulletin, 9, 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, B. (1976). On the Choice of Risk Loadings, Transactions of the 20th International Congress of Actuaries, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Biger, N. and Kahane, Y. (1978). Risk Considerations in Insurance Ratemaking, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 45, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, H. (1976). Solvency and Profitability Standards, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2, 110–113.Google Scholar
Borch, K. (1974). The Mathematical Theory of Insurance, Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Bühlmann, H. (1970). The Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory, Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Burnens, E. (1972). Contingency Loadings in Life Insurance, Transactions of the 19th International Congress of Actuaries, 4, 621–631.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Division of Insurance, Rate of Return and Profit Provision in Automobile Insurance, Unpublished Memorandom, (1977).Google Scholar
Cooper, R. W. (1974). Investment Return and P-L Insurance Ratemaking, Homewood, Illinois, Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. (1974). On Additive Premium Calculation Principles, The ASTIN Bulletin, 7, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, Y. (1977). Ratemaking and Regulation in Property-Liability Insurance, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 17, 97–112.Google Scholar
Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. and Pogue, J. (1974). An Introduction to Risk and Return: Concepts and Evidence, Financial Analysts' Journal, 68–79 and 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a Capital Assets Market, Econometrica, 34, 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, D. H. (1971). On the Theory of Financial Intermediation, Journal of Finance, 26, 737–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirin, D. G., Halpern, P. J., Kalymon, B. A., Mathewson, G. F. and Waters, W. R. (1974). Competition, Economic Efficiency and Profitability in the Canadian P-L Insurance Industry, Toronto: Insurance Bureau of Canada.Google Scholar
Quirin, D. G. and Waters, W. R. (1975). Market Efficiency and the Cost of Capital: The Strange Case of Fire and Casualty Insurance Companies, Journal of Finance, 30, 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk, Journal of Finance, 19, 425–442.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F. (1970). Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets, New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar