Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

PRICING IN REINSURANCE BARGAINING WITH COMONOTONIC ADDITIVE UTILITY FUNCTIONS

  • Tim J. Boonen (a1), Ken Seng Tan (a2) and Sheng Chao Zhuang (a3)

Abstract

Optimal reinsurance indemnities have widely been studied in the literature, yet the bargaining for optimal prices has remained relatively unexplored. Therefore, the key objective of this paper is to analyze the price of reinsurance contracts. We use a novel way to model the bargaining powers of the insurer and reinsurer, which allows us to generalize the contracts according to the Nash bargaining solution, indifference pricing and the equilibrium contracts. We illustrate these pricing functions by means of inverse-S shaped distortion functions for the insurer and the Value-at-Risk for the reinsurer.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      PRICING IN REINSURANCE BARGAINING WITH COMONOTONIC ADDITIVE UTILITY FUNCTIONS
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      PRICING IN REINSURANCE BARGAINING WITH COMONOTONIC ADDITIVE UTILITY FUNCTIONS
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      PRICING IN REINSURANCE BARGAINING WITH COMONOTONIC ADDITIVE UTILITY FUNCTIONS
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Aase, K.K. (1993a) Equilibrium in a reinsurance syndicate; existence, uniqueness and characterization. ASTIN Bulletin, 23 (2), 185211.
Aase, K.K. (1993b) Premiums in a dynamic model of a reinsurance market. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1993 (2), 134160.
Aase, K.K. (2002) Perspectives of risk sharing. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2002 (2), 73128.
Aase, K.K. (2009) The Nash bargaining solution vs. equilibrium in a reinsurance syndicate. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2009 (3), 219238.
Abdellaoui, M. (2000) Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46 (11), 14971512.
Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. and Heath, D. (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9 (3), 203228.
Asimit, A. V., Badescu, A.M. and Verdonck, T. (2013) Optimal risk transfer under quantile-based risk measurers. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53 (1), 252265.
Assa, H. (2015) On optimal reinsurance policy with distortion risk measures and premiums. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 61 (1), 7075.
Barrieu, P. and El Karoui, N. (2005) Inf-convolution of risk measures and optimal risk transfer. Finance and Stochastics, 9 (2), 269298.
Bernard, C., He, X., Yan, J.-A. and Zhou, X.Y. (2015) Optimal insurance design under rank-dependent expected utility. Mathematical Finance, 25 (1), 154186.
Bertrand, J. (1883) Review of ‘Théorie mathématique de la richesse sociale’ and ‘Recherches sur les principles mathématiques de la théorie des richesses’. Journal des Savants, 48, 499508.
Binmore, K.G. (1998) Game Theory and the Social Contract: Just Playing, Volume 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Boonen, T.J. (2015) Competitive equilibria with distortion risk measures. ASTIN Bulletin, 45 (3), 703728.
Boonen, T.J. (2016) Nash equilibria of over-the-counter bargaining for insurance risk redistributions: The role of a regulator. European Journal of Operational Research, 250 (3), 955965.
Boonen, T.J., De Waegenaere, A. and Norde, H. (2012) Bargaining for Over-The-Counter risk redistributions: The case of longevity risk. CentER Discussion Paper Series No. 2012-090.
Boonen, T.J., Tan, K.S. and Zhuang, S.C. (2015) Optimal reinsurance with one insurer and multiple reinsurers, Working Paper, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2628950.
Borch, K.H. (1960) Reciprocal reinsurance threaties. ASTIN Bulletin, 1 (4), 170191.
Borch, K.H. (1962) Equilibrium in a reinsurance market. Econometrica, 30 (3), 424444.
Britz, V., Herings, P. and Predtetchinski, A. (2010) Non-cooperative support for the asymmetric Nash bargaining solution. Journal of Economic Theory, 145 (5), 19511967.
Bühlmann, H. and Jewell, W.S. (1979) Optimal risk exchanges. ASTIN Bulletin, 10 (3), 243262.
Burgert, C. and Rüschendorf, L. (2006) On the optimal risk allocation problem. Statistics & Decisions, 24, 153171.
Burgert, C. and Rüschendorf, L. (2008) Allocations of risks and equilibrium in markets with finitely many traders. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42 (1), 177188.
Chateauneuf, A., Dana, R.-A. and Tallon, J.-M. (2000) Optimal risk-sharing rules and equilibria with Choquet-expected-utility. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 34 (2), 191214.
Cheung, K.C. and Lo, A. (2015) Characterizations of optimal reinsurance treaties: A cost-benefit approach. Forthcoming in Scandinavian Actuarial Journal.
Chi, Y. (2012) Reinsurance arrangements minimizing the risk-adjusted value of an insurer's liability. ASTIN Bulletin, 42 (2), 529557.
Chi, Y. and Meng, H. (2014) Optimal reinsurance arrangements in the presence of two reinsurers. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2014 (5), 424438.
Chi, Y. and Tan, K.S. (2011) Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CVaR risk measures: A simplified approach. ASTIN Bulletin, 41 (2), 487509.
Chi, Y. and Weng, C. (2013) Optimal reinsurance subject to Vajda condition. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53 (1), 179189.
Cui, W., Yang, J. and Wu, L. (2013) Optimal reinsurance minimizing the distortion risk measure under general reinsurance premium principles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53 (1), 7485.
De Castro, L.I. and Chateauneuf, A. (2011) Ambiguity aversion and trade. Economic Theory, 48 (2), 243273.
De Giorgi, E. and Post, T. (2008) Second-order stochastic dominance, reward-risk portfolio selection, and the CAPM. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43 (2), 525546.
De Waegenaere, A., Kast, R. and Lapied, A. (2003) Choquet pricing and equilibrium. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 32 (3), 359370.
Denuit, M. and Vermandele, C. (1998) Optimal reinsurance and stop-loss order. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 22 (3), 229233.
Filipović, D., Kremslehner, R. and Muermann, A. (2015) Optimal investment and premium policies under risk shifting and solvency regulation. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82 (2), 261288.
Filipović, D. and Kupper, M. (2008) Equilibrium prices for monetary utility functions. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 11 (3), 325343.
Föllmer, H. and Schied, A. (2002) Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance and Stochastics, 6 (4), 429447.
Frittelli, M. and Rosazza-Gianin, E. (2002) Putting order in risk measures. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (7), 14731486.
Gerber, H. and Pafumi, G. (1998) Utility functions: From risk theory to finance. North American Actuarial Journal, 2 (3), 7491.
He, X.D. and Zhou, X.Y. (2011) Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: An analytical treatment. Management Science, 57 (2), 315331.
Heath, D. and Ku, H. (2004) Pareto equilibria with coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 14 (2), 163172.
Jin, H. and Zhou, X.Y. (2008) Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time. Mathematical Finance, 18 (3), 385426.
Jouini, E., Schachermayer, W. and Touzi, N. (2008) Optimal risk sharing for law invariant monetary utility functions. Mathematical Finance, 18 (2), 269292.
Kalai, E. (1977) Nonsymmetric Nash solutions and replications of 2-person bargaining. International Journal of Game Theory, 6 (3), 129133.
Kihlstrom, R.E. and Roth, A.E. (1982) Risk aversion and the negotiation of insurance contracts. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 49 (3), 372387.
Landsberger, M. and Meilijson, I.I. (1994) Comonotone allocations, Bickel-Lehmann dispersion and the Arrow-Pratt measure of risk aversion. Annals of Operations Research, 52 (2), 97106.
Lemaire, J. (1990) Borch's theorem: A historical survey of applications. In Risk, Information and Insurance. Essays in the memory of Karl H. Borch (ed. Loubergé, H.), pp. 1537. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ludkovski, M. and Rüschendorf, L. (2008) On comonotonicity of Pareto optimal risk sharing. Statistics & Probability Letters, 78 (10), 11811188.
Ludkovski, M. and Young, V.R. (2009) Optimal risk sharing under distorted probabilities. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2 (2), 87105.
Markowitz, H. (1952) Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7 (1), 7791.
Miyakawa, T. (2012) Non-cooperative foundation of Nash bargaining solution under incomplete information, Osaka University of Economics Working Paper Serier No. 2012-2.
Nash, J.F. (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18 (2), 155162.
Osborne, M.J. and Rubinstein, A. (1990) Bargaining and markets, Volume 34. San Diego: Academic press.
Pritsker, M. (1997) Evaluating Value at Risk Methodologies: Accuracy versus Computational Time. Journal of Financial Services Research, 12 (2), 201242.
Quiggin, J. (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3 (4), 323343.
Quiggin, J. (1991) Comparative statics for rank-dependent expected utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4 (4), 339350.
Quiggin, J. (1992) Generalized expected utility theory: The rank dependent model. Boston: Springer Science & Business Media.
Quiggin, J. and Chambers, R.G. (2009) Bargaining power and efficiency in insurance contracts. Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 34 (1), 4773.
Raviv, A. (1979) The design of an optimal insurance policy. American Economic Review, 69 (1), 8496.
Rieger, M.O. and Wang, M. (2006) Cumulative prospect theory and the St. Petersburg paradox. Economic Theory, 28 (3), 665679.
Schlesinger, H. (1984) Two-person insurance negotiation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 3 (3), 147149.
Schmeidler, D. (1986) Integral representation without additivity. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 97 (2), 255261.
Schmeidler, D. (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57 (3), 571587.
Taylor, G.C. (1992a) Risk exchange I: A unification of some existing results. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1992 (1), 1539.
Taylor, G.C. (1992b) Risk exchange II: Optimal reinsurance contracts. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1992 (1), 4059.
Tsanakas, A. and Christofides, N. (2006) Risk exchange with distorted probabilities. ASTIN Bulletin, 36 (1), 219243.
Tversky, A. and Fox, C.R. (1995) Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102 (2), 269283.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (4), 297323.
Wang, S.S., Young, V.R. and Panjer, H.H. (1997) Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 21 (2), 173183.
Werner, J. (2001) Participation in risk-sharing under ambiguity. Technical report, University of Minnesota.
Wilson, R. (1968) The theory of syndicates. Econometrica, 36 (1), 119132.
Wu, G. and Gonzalez, R. (1999) Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Management Science, 45 (1), 7485.
Xu, Z.Q. and Zhou, X.Y. (2013) Optimal stopping under probability distortion. Annals of Applied Probability, 23 (1), 251282.
Xu, Z.Q., Zhou, X.Y. and Zhuang, S.C. (2015) Optimal insurance with rank-dependent utility and increasing indemnities, Working Paper, available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2660113.
Yaari, M.E. (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55 (1), 95115.
Young, V.R. (1999) Optimal insurance under Wang's premium principle. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 25 (2), 109122.
Zhou, R., Li, J.S.-H. and Tan, K.S. (2015a) Economic pricing of mortality-linked securities: A tâtonnement approach. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82 (1), 6596.
Zhou, R., Li, J.S.-H. and Tan, K.S. (2015b) Modeling longevity risk transfers as Nash bargaining problems: Methodology and insights. Economic Modelling, 51, 460472.

Keywords

PRICING IN REINSURANCE BARGAINING WITH COMONOTONIC ADDITIVE UTILITY FUNCTIONS

  • Tim J. Boonen (a1), Ken Seng Tan (a2) and Sheng Chao Zhuang (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed