Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:01:41.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal VIX-linked structure for the target benefit pension plan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2023

Lv Chen ,
Danping Li ,
Yumin Wang  and
Xiaobai Zhu Open the ORCID record for Xiaobai Zhu [Opens in a new window]
Lv Chen
Affiliation:
Academy of Statistics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, KLATASDS-MOE, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
Danping Li*
Affiliation:
School of Statistics, KLATASDS-MOE, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
Yumin Wang
Affiliation:
Warren Centre for Actuarial Studies and Research, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Xiaobai Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Finance, CUHK Business School, Hong Kong, China
*
Corresponding author: Danping Li; Email: dpli@fem.ecnu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we study the optimal VIX-linked target benefit (TB) pension design. By applying the dynamic programming approach, we show the optimal risk-sharing structure for the benefit payment exhibits a linear form that consists of three components: (1) a model-robust performance adjustment, (2) a counter-cyclical volatility adjustment that depends on the VIX index, and (3) a TB level that is partially indexed to the cost-of-living adjustment. Differences between our results and the previous literature are highlighted via both theoretical derivations and numerical illustrations.

Keywords

Target benefit planintergenerational risk sharingvolatility indexpartial indexation
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , pp. 75 - 93
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Actuarial Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Academy of Actuaries (2012) “The 80% Pension funding standard Myth.” Issue Brief.Google Scholar
Bams, D., Schotman, P.C. and Tyagi, M. (2016) “ Optimal risk sharing in a collective defined contribution pension system.” Working paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D.S. (2000) “Post-’87 crash fears in the S&P 500 futures option market.” Journal of Econometrics, 94(1-2), 181–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetsma, R.M. and Lans Bovenberg, A. (2009) “Pensions and intergenerational risk-sharing in general equilibrium.” Economica, 76(302), 364–386.Google Scholar
Beetsma, R.M., Romp, W.E. and Vos, S.J. (2012) “Voluntary participation and intergenerational risk sharing in a funded pension system.” European Economic Review, 56(6), 1310–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bégin, J.F. (2020) “Levelling the playing field: A VIX-linked structure for funded pension schemes.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 94, 58–78.Google Scholar
Berkson, J. (1944) “Application of the logistic function to bio-assay.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 39(227), 357–365.Google Scholar
Bliss, R.R. and Panigirtzoglou, N. (2004) “Option-implied risk aversion estimates.” The Journal of Finance, 59(1), 407–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boes, M.J. and Siegmann, A. (2018) “Intergenerational risk sharing under loss averse preferences.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 92, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, L. and Mehlkopf, R. (2014) “Optimal design of funded pension schemes.” Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 445–474.Google Scholar
Chen, A., Nguyen, T. and Rach, M. (2021a) “A collective investment problem in a stochastic volatility environment: The impact of sharing rules.” Annals of Operations Research, 302, 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, A., Nguyen, T. and Rach, M. (2021b) “Optimal collective investment: The impact of sharing rules, management fees and guarantees.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 123, 106012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, A., Nguyen, T. and Stadje, M. (2018) “Optimal investment under VaR-regulation and minimum insurance.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 79, 194–209.Google Scholar
Chen, D.H., Beetsma, R.M., Broeders, D.W. and Pelsser, A.A. (2017) “Sustainability of participation in collective pension schemes: An option pricing approach.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 74, 182–196.Google Scholar
Chen, L., Li, D., Wang, Y. and Zhu, X. (2023) “The optimal cyclical design for a target benefit pension plan.” Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 22(3), 284–303.Google Scholar
Cox, J.C., Ingersoll, J.E. Jr and Ross, S.A. (1985) “A theory of the term structure of interest rates.” Econometrica, 53(2), 385–407.Google Scholar
Cui, J., De Jong, F. and Ponds, E. (2011) “Intergenerational risk sharing within funded pension schemes.” Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Z., Feng, R. and MacKay, A. (2017) “Variable annuities with VIX-linked fee structure under a Heston-type stochastic volatility model.” North American Actuarial Journal, 21(3), 458–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egloff, D., Leippold, M. and Wu, L. (2010) “The term structure of variance swap rates and optimal variance swap investments.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(5), 1279–1310.Google Scholar
Escobar, M., Ferrando, S. and Rubtsov, A. (2015) “Robust portfolio choice with derivative trading under stochastic volatility.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 61, 142–157.Google Scholar
Goecke, O. (2013) “Pension saving schemes with return smoothing mechanism.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53(3), 678–689.Google Scholar
Gollier, C. (2008) “Intergenerational risk-sharing and risk-taking of a pension fund.” Journal of Public Economics, 92(5), 1463–1485.Google Scholar
Hardy, M., Saunders, D. and Zhu, X. (2020) “Risk Sharing Pension Plans: Sustainability, Affordability, Adequacy, and Fairness.” National Pension Hub Publications. URL https://globalriskinstitute.org/publications/risk-sharingpension-plans-sustainability-affordability-adequacy-and-fairness.Google Scholar
Hong, Y. and Jin, X. (2022) “Pricing of variance swap rates and investment decisions of variance swaps: Evidence from a three-factor model.” European Journal of Operational Research, 303(2), 975–985.Google Scholar
Jin, X. and Zhang, A.X. (2012) “Decomposition of optimal portfolio weight in a jump-diffusion model and its applications.” The Review of Financial Studies, 25(9), 2877–2919.Google Scholar
Jin, X. and Zhang, K. (2013) “Dynamic optimal portfolio choice in a jump-diffusion model with investment constraints.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(5), 1733–1746.Google Scholar
Khorasanee, Z.M. (2012) “Risk-sharing and benefit smoothing in a hybrid pension plan.” North American Actuarial Journal, 16(4), 449–461.Google Scholar
Kouritzin, M.A. and MacKay, A. (2018) “VIX-linked fees for GMWBs via explicit solution simulation methods.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 81, 1–17.Google Scholar
Lin, Y.N. (2007) “Pricing VIX futures: Evidence from integrated physical and risk-neutral probability measures.” Journal of Futures Markets: Futures, Options, and Other Derivative Products, 27(12), 1175–1217.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2017) “Robustly strategic consumption–portfolio rules with informational frictions.” Management Science, 63(12), 4158–4174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mania, M. and Schweizer, M. (2005) “Dynamic exponential utility indifference valuation.” The Annals of Applied Probability, 15(3), 2113–2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. (1969) “Life time portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, J. (2002) “The jump-risk premia implicit in options: Evidence from an integrated time-series study.” Journal of Financial Economics, 63(1), 3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rong, X., Tao, C. and Zhao, H. (2023) “Target benefit pension plan with longevity risk and intergenerational equity.” ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 53(1), 84–103.Google Scholar
United Nations (2022) World Population Prospects 2022. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, M.C., Kool, C.J. and Prast, H.M. (2007) “Risk-return preferences in the pension domain: Are people able to choose?” Journal of Public Economics, 91(3-4), 701–722.Google Scholar
Wang, N. (2006) “Generalizing the permanent-income hypothesis: Revisiting Friedman’s conjecture on consumption.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(4), 737–752.Google Scholar
Wang, N. (2007) “Optimal investment for an insurer with exponential utility preference.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 40(1), 77–84.Google Scholar
Wang, N. (2009) “Optimal consumption and asset allocation with unknown income growth.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(4), 524–534.Google Scholar
Wang, S. and Lu, Y. (2019) “Optimal investment strategies and risk-sharing arrangements for a hybrid pension plan.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 89, 46–62.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Lu, Y. and Sanders, B. (2018) “Optimal investment strategies and intergenerational risk sharing for target benefit pension plans.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 80, 1–14.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Rong, X. and Zhao, H. (2019) “Optimal investment and benefit payment strategy under loss aversion for target benefit pension plans.” Applied Mathematics and Computation, 346, 205–218.Google Scholar
Yang, H. and Zhang, L. (2005) “Optimal investment for insurer with jump-diffusion risk process.” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 37(3), 615–634.Google Scholar
Yin, X., Goudriaan, J., Lantinga, E.A., Vos, J. and Spiertz, H.J. (2003) “A flexible sigmoid function of determinate growth.” Annals of Botany, 91(3), 361–371.Google Scholar
Zhao, H. and Wang, S. (2022) “Optimal investment and benefit adjustment problem for a target benefit pension plan with Cobb-Douglas utility and Epstein-Zin recursive utility.” European Journal of Operational Research, 301(3), 1166–1180.Google Scholar
Zhu, X., Hardy, M. and Saunders, D. (2021) “Fair transition from defined benefit to target benefit.” ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 51(3), 873–904.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material 1

Download Chen et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 128 KB
Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material 2

Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 25.9 KB