Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

OPTIMAL MIX BETWEEN PAY AS YOU GO AND FUNDING FOR PENSION LIABILITIES IN A STOCHASTIC FRAMEWORK

  • Pierre Devolder (a1) and Roberta Melis (a2)

Abstract

This paper addresses the financing of public pensions in a stochastic environment. Traditionally, funded and unfunded pension schemes have been viewed as opposite solutions for the first pillar of public pensions. However, more recently countries as Sweden and Poland have explored mixed solutions that combine pay-as-you-go (PAYG) with funding mechanisms. The aims of this paper are to examine the rationality of such a combination using portfolio theory arguments and to find the optimal split of the contributions between the two systems. We first introduce the classical deterministic model leading to the well-known Samuelson–Aaron rule according to which diversification is never optimal. We then introduce different stochastic models in which the main processes (wage growth, population growth, financial rate of return) are random. In particular, we obtain conditions on parameters to justify diversification and explicit optimal sharing between PAYG and funding. We also introduce the possibility of investing in several financial assets and explore the impact of introducing systematic longevity risk.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aaron, H. (1966) The social insurance paradox. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 32 (3), 371374.
Bilancini, E. and D'Antoni, A. (2012) The desirability of pay-as-you-go pensions when relative consumption matters and returns are stochastic. Economics Letters, 117 (2), 418422.
De Menil, G., Murtin, F. and Sheshinski, E. (2006) Planning for the optimal mix of paygo tax and funded savings. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 5 (1), 125.
Dutta, J., Kapur, S. and Orszag, M. (1999) How to fund pensions: Income uncertainty and risk-aversion. Birkbech Economics Working Papers, No 99–03.
Dutta, J., Kapur, S. and Orszag, M. (2000) A portfolio approach to the optimal funding of pensions Economics Letters, 69, 201206.
Guigou, J.D., Lovat, B. and Schiltz, J. (2012) Optimal mix of funded and unfunded pension systems: The case of Luxembourg. Pensions: An International Journal, 17 (4), 208222.
Knell, M. (2010) The optimal mix between funded and unfunded pension systems when people care about relative consumption. Economica, 77, 710733.
Matsen, E. and Thogersen, O. (2004) Designing social security — a portfolio choice approach. European Economic Review, 48, 883904.
Meijdam, L. and Ponds, E. (2013) On the optimal degree of funding of public sector pension plans. Discussion Paper Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research, Vol. 2013-011.
Melis, R. and Trudda, A. (2012) Solvency indicators for partially unfunded pension funds. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 9 (4), 7177.
Merton, R.C. (1983) On the role of social security as a means for efficient risk sharing in an economy where human capital is not tradeable. In Financial Aspects of the United States Pensions System (eds. Bodie, Z. and Shoven, J.), pp. 325358. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Miles, D. (2000) Funded and unfunded pension schemes: Risk return and welfare. CESifo Working Paper, No 239.
Samuelson, P.A. (1958) An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy, 66 (6), 467482.
Thogersen, O. and Bohlerengen, K. (2010) Alternative risk-sharing mechanism of social security. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 66 (2), 134152.
Van Praag, B. and Cardoso, P. (2003) The mix between pay-as-you-go and funded pensions and what demography has to do with it. CESifo Working Paper, No 865.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed