Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5bf98f6d76-xcz5z Total loading time: 0.774 Render date: 2021-04-21T05:28:02.665Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

The ASEAN Human Rights System: A Critical Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2016

Hien BUI
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore, Singapore hienbui@nus.edu.sg
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Get access

Abstract

This article offers a critical analysis of the human rights system established by ASEAN. It first investigates concrete evidence of the system’s ineffectiveness by comparing the cases of Myanmar and Thailand, which illustrate ASEAN’s failure to address human rights violations both before and after the creation of the ASEAN system. It then examines the substantive and procedural limitations of the ASEAN human rights instruments and mechanisms. Specifically, while restrictions on rights and freedoms contained in the instruments undermine the universality of human rights, ASEAN’s mechanisms lack independence and offer only weak protection mandates to address rights violations. In addition, the absence of a judicial body to hear complaints and issue binding remedies makes the system incomplete. The article recommends the creation of an ASEAN court of human rights and suggests changes to the existing instruments and mechanisms that might accommodate the new court.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© National University of Singapore, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

LLM (University of London); LLB (Vietnam National University); Bar Training (Vietnam Judicial Academy); Research Associate, Centre for Asian Legal Studies, National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law; With special thanks to Prof Andrew Harding, Dr Paul Gragl, Dr Tan Hsien-Li, and Dr Son Bui for their inspirational guidance; and Marie De Martino for her unconditional love and support.

References

1. ASEAN is the association of ten Southeast Asian countries, namely Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. See ASEAN Secretariat, “ASEAN Member States”, online: ASEAN <http://www.asean.org/asean/asean-member-states>.

2. ASEAN Secretariat, “History”, online: ASEAN <http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/history>.

3. PITSUWAN, Surin, “Foreword” in Tommy KOH, Gosario MANALO, and Water WOON, eds, The Making of the ASEAN Charter (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd, 2009), xv at xvGoogle Scholar.

4. ASEAN Vision 2020, Kuala Lumpur, 15 December 1997, para 3 [ASEAN Vision 2020].

5. HAYTON, Bill, Vietnam: Rising Dragon (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2011) at 113134 Google Scholar; Human Right Watch, “World Report 2014: Cambodia”, online: Human Rights Watch <http://www.hrw.org/world-report/2014/country-chapters/cambodia?page=3>.

6. KUHONTA, Erik Martinez, “Toward Responsible Sovereignty: The Case for Intervention” in Donald K EMMERSON, ed, Hard Choices: Security, Democracy, and Regionalism in Southeast Asia (Stanford: The Walter H Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Centre, 2008), 292 at 293 Google Scholar; CHESTERMAN, Simon, “Does ASEAN Exist? The Association of Southeast Asian Nations as an International Legal Person” (2008) 12 Singapore Year Book of International Law 199 at 206 Google Scholar.

7. COLLINGE, Daniel, “Background Paper on ASEAN and Human Rights” (2010) at 16, online: OHCHR <http://bangkok.ohchr.org/files/Regional_Dialogue_ASEAN_Background_Paper.pdf>>Google Scholar.

8. See WAHYUNINGRUM, Yuyun, “ASEAN Human Rights” (Presentation at the 28th DTP Session, Dili, Timor Leste, 23 November 2013), online: Slideshare <http://www.slideshare.net/wahyuningrum1/asean-human-rights-yuyun-wahyuningrum-2013> (PowerPoint slides)+(PowerPoint+slides)>Google Scholar.

9. ASEAN Human Rights Declaration, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 18 November 2012, art 7 [AHRD].

10. Ibid, art 6.

11. Ibid, arts 27 and 30.

12. Ibid, art 8.

13. PHAN, Hao Duy, A Selective Approach to Establishing a Human Rights Mechanism in Southeast Asia: The Case for a Southeast Asian Court Of Human Rights (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012) at 185224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar [Phan, A Selective Approach].

14. TAN, Eugene KB, “The ASEAN Charter as ‘Legs to Go Places’: Ideational Norms and Pragmatic Legalism in Community Building in Southeast Asia” (2008) 12 Singapore Year Book of International Law 171 at 174 Google Scholar.

15. HENDERSON, Jeannie, Reassessing ASEAN (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999) at 4044 Google Scholar.

16. COCKERHAM, Geoffrey B, “Regional Integration in ASEAN: Institutional Design and the ASEAN Way” (2010) 27:2 East Asia: An International Quarterly 165 at 174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. “Asean Remains Silent as Myanmar Junta Ignores Global Outrage” ASEAN Affairs (19 May 2009), online: ASEAN Affairs <http://www.aseanaffairs.com/myanmar_daily_news_updates/politics/asean_remains_silent_as_myanmar_junta_ignores_global_outrage>.

18. “‘Useless’ Asean Human Rights Mechanism Needs Scrutiny–Group” Newsdesk (2 July 2013), online: Newsdesk <http://newsdesk.asia/useless-asean-human-rights-mechanism-needs-scrutiny-group/>.

19. DAVIES, Mathew, “The ASEAN Synthesis: Human Rights, Non-Intervention, and the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration” (2013) 14:2 Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 51 at 53 Google Scholar [Davies, “The ASEAN Synthesis”].

20. These instruments are the ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion on the Rights of Migrant Workers, done at Cebu, Philippines, 13 January 2007, and a number of instruments on Women and Children, such as the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women and Children in ASEAN, adopted in Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam, 9 October 2013, the ASEAN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women, done in Jakarta, Indonesia, 13 June 2004, and the ASEAN Declaration on the Advancement of Women, done in Bangkok, Thailand, 5 July 1988.

21. The ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and the Protection of the Rights of Women and Children (2010); and the ASEAN Committee to Implement the Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers (2007).

22. SEN, BK, “Need for Legal Aid Law in Burma: Problems and Prospects” (2003) 14 Legal Issues on Burma Journal 23 at 26 Google Scholar; BOTELHO, Greg, HANCOCKS, Paula, and OLARN, Kocha, “Thai Military Takes Over in Coup – Again” CNN (22 May 2014), online: CNN <http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/22/world/asia/thailand-martial-law/>>Google Scholar.

23. UNHRC, The Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar, HRC Res A/HRC/RES/19/21, 19th Sess, UN Doc A/HRC/RES/19/21 (20 March 2012), para 7; Audrey COUPRIE, “Thailand: Military Junta Must Respect Freedoms Guaranteed Under International Law” FIDH: Worldwide Movement for Human Rights (30 May 2014), online: FIDH <http://www.fidh.org/en/asia/thailand/15427-thailand-military-junta-must-respect-freedoms-guaranteed-under>.

24. CHACHAVALPONGPUN, Pavin, “The New Thailand-Myanmar Axis” The Diplomat (29 June 2014), online: The Diplomat <http://thediplomat.com/2014/07/the-new-thailand-myanmar-axis/>>Google Scholar.

25. To clarify, the birth of the AHRD can be considered as a “watershed” for two main reasons. First, it represents ASEAN’s first collective and complete announcement towards human rights in general, which is similar to the UDHR (as opposed to other instruments that address solely the rights of particular subjects, such as women, children or migrant workers). Second, it is also the latest significant move towards a regional human rights system, following the creation of the AICHR in 2009. This does not mean that the ASEAN human rights system did not exist before the AHRD. However, the adoption of the AHRD completes the ASEAN human rights system as a regional system which consists of both regional mechanisms and instruments to promote and protects human rights.

26. “Myanmar Country Profile” BBC (30 March 2016), online: BBC < http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12990563>.

27. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 54.

28. CHRISTINE, Kenneth and ROY, Denny, The Politics of Human Rights in East Asia (London: Pluto Press, 2001) at 81 Google Scholar.

29. “Myanmar Profile Overview” BBC (27 August 2015), online: BBC <http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-12990565>.

30. Supra note 26.

31. Christine and Roy, supra note 28 at 89.

32. HLAING, Kyaw Yin, “ASEAN’s Pariah: Insecurity and Autocracy in Myanmar (Burma)” in Emmerson, ed, supra note 6, 151 at 153 Google Scholar.

33. BRANDON, John J, “ASEAN Chairmanship Offers Opportunity for Myanmar” Asia Foundation (8 January 2014), online: Asia Foundation <http://asiafoundation.org/in-asia/2014/01/08/asean-chairmanship-offers-opportunity-for-myanmar/>>Google Scholar.

34. JONES, Lee, ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) at 180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar [Jones, Sovereignty and Intervention].

35. Ibid at 182.

36. Ibid at 181.

37. Jones, Sovereignty and Intervention, supra note 34 at 182.

38. JONES, Lee, “ASEAN’s Albatross: ASEAN’s Burma Policy, from Constructive Engagement to Critical Disengagement” (2008) 4:3 Asian Security 271 at 271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39. Hlaing, supra note 32 at 157.

40. International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute, The Rule of Law in Myanmar: Challenges and Prospects (London: International Bar Association, 2012) at 19 Google Scholar.

41. BUNYANUNDA, Mann, “Burma, ASEAN, and Human Rights: The Decade of Constructive Engagement 1991–2001” (2002) 2 Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs 118 Google Scholar; Kuhonta, supra note 6.

42. Ibid at 120.

43. Ibid.

44. Kuhonta, supra note 6 at 302.

45. Hlaing, supra note 32 at 154.

46. THIO, Li-ann, “Implementing Human Rights in ASEAN Countries: Promises to Keep and Miles to Go Before I Sleep” (1999) 2 Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 1 at 4 Google Scholar.

47. MOE, Wai, “ASEAN Countries Vote Against UN Committee Resolution on Burma” The Irrawaddy (21 November 2007), online: The Irrawaddy <http://www2.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_Ibid=9386> (quoting Anselmo Lee)+(quoting+Anselmo+Lee)>Google Scholar.

48. SEAH, Daniel, “The ASEAN Charter” (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 197 at 197 Google Scholar.

49. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 75.

50. Kuhonta, supra note 6 at 300.

51. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 60–61.

52. Human Rights Watch, “Thailand: Revoke Martial Law Undermining Rights” (20 May 2014), online: Human Rights Watch <http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/20/thailand-revoke-martial-law-undermining-rights>.

53. ACHAKULWISUT, Atiya, “Keep Quiet, We Are Building Democracy” Bangkok Post (30 June 2015), online: The Bangkok Post <http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/607960/keep-quiet-we-re-building-democracy>>Google Scholar.

54. Ibid.

55. BACALSO, Mary and MUGIYANTO, , “Members of ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights, Act Now Against Increasing Human Rights Violations in the Region!” Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances (AFAD) (15 June 2014)Google Scholar, online: AFAD <http://www.afad-online.org/news/10-statements/189-members-of-asean-intergovernmental-commission-on-human-rights-act-now-against-increasing-human-rights-violations-in-the-region>.

56. TANSUBHAPOL, Thanida, “Thailand Lobbies ASEAN to Defend the Coup” Bangkok Post (4 June 2014)Google Scholar, online: The Bangkok Post < http://www.bangkokpost.com/most-recent/413578/thailand-to-asean-to-defend-coup>.

57. MUNRO, James, “Why States Create International Human Rights Mechanisms: The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights and Democratic Lock-in Theory” (2009) 10(1) Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law 1 at 1315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. This might, however, be true for few more democratic countries like the Philippines and Indonesia.

58. POOLE, Avery, “The World Is Outraged: Legitimacy in the Making of the ASEAN Human Rights Body” (2015) 37(3) Contemporary Southeast Asia 355 at 357 Google Scholar.

59. See KATSUMATA, Hiro, “ASEAN and Human Rights: Resisting Western Pressure or Emulating the West?” (2009) 22(5) The Pacific Review 619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; HAFNER-BURTON, Emilie and TSUTSUI, Kiyoteru, “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises” (2005) 110(5) American Journal of Sociology 1373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60. Cited in Poole supra note 58 at 367.

61. For substantive issues, see Mathew DAVIES, “The ASEAN Synthesis”, supra note 19; NG, Joel, “ASEAN Human Rights Declaration: A Pragmatic Compromise” (2012) RISIS Commentaries No 211 1 at 3 Google Scholar, online: NTU <http://dr.ntu.edu.sg/bitstream/handle/10220/11694/RSIS2112012.pdf?sequence=1>; RENSHAW, Katherine Shanahan, “The ASEAN Human Rights Declaration 2012” (2013) 13(3) Human Rights Law Review 557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; CLARKE, Gerard, “The Evolving ASEAN Human Rights System: The ASEAN Human Rights Declaration of 2012” (2012) 11 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 1 Google Scholar; NALDI, Gino J and MAGLIVERAS, Konstantinos D, “The ASEAN Human Rights Declaration” (2014) 3(2) International Human Rights Law Review 183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For procedural issues, see PHAN, A Selective Approach, supra note 13; TAN, Hsien-Li, The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) at 160 Google Scholar; DURBACH, Andrea, RENSHAW, Catherine, and BYRNES, Andrew, ”A Tongue but No Teeth?’: The Emergence of a Regional Human Rights Mechanism in the Asia Pacific Region” (2009) 31 Sydney Law Review 211 Google Scholar, BASHAM-JONES, Deborah, “ASEAN’s Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: A Pale Shadow of What It Could Have Been” (2012) 13(2) Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; GINBER, Yuval, “Human Rights in ASEAN – Setting Sail or Treading Water” (2010) 10(3) Human Rights Law Review 504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; MUNTARBHORN, Vitit, “A Roadmap for an ASEAN Human Rights Mechanism” (Prepared for the Third Workshop for an ASEAN Regional Mechanism on Human Rights, Bangkok, Thailand, 28–29 May 2003)Google Scholar, online: Friedrich Neumann Foundation for Liberty <http://www.fnf.org.ph/liberallibrary/roadmap-for-asean-human-rights.htm> [Muntarbhorn, “A Roadmap”]; DRUMMOND, Catherine, “The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) and the Responsibility to Protect: Development and Potential” (2010) Working Paper on ASEAN and R2P No I Google Scholar.

62. OHCHR, “An Overview of Regional Human Rights Systems”, online: OHCHR <http://bangkok.ohchr.org/programme/regional-systems.aspx>.

63. See BAIK, Tek-Ung, Emerging Regional Human Rights Systems in Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012) at 43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar: human rights norms and protection mechanisms are key elements of a human rights system. While norms illustrate the goals of a system, institutions for human rights are the guarantee of the protection mechanism.

64. DOYLE, Nicholas, “The ASEAN Human Rights Declaration and the Implications of Recent Southeast Asian Initiatives in Human Rights Institution-Building and Standard Setting” (2014) 63 International and Comparative law Quarterly 67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65. GUZMAN, Andrew and MEYER, Timothy, “International Soft Law” (2010) Journal of Legal Analysis 171 at 174 Google Scholar.

66. Ibid.

67. Tan, supra note 61 at 187.

68. Ibid at 188.

69. Ibid at 187.

70. MILIAUSKAITÉ, Kristina, “Human Rights Dichotomy: Universality or Particularism?” (2004) 54(46) Jurisprudencija 54 at 92 Google Scholar.

71. STEINER, Henry J, ALSTON, Philip, and GOODMAN, Ryan, International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals: Text and Materials, 3d edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) at 157 Google Scholar; THAROOR, Shashi, “Are Human Rights Universal?” (2000) XVI:4 World Policy Journal 1 at 1 Google Scholar; KINGSBURY, Damien, “Universalism and Exceptionalism in Asia” in Leena AVONIUS and Damien KINGSBURY, eds, Human Rights in Asia: A Reassessment of the Asian Values Debate (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 19 at 20 Google Scholar.

72. TOMUSCHAT, Chriatian, Human Rights Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) at 69 Google Scholar.

73. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, GA Res 217 (III), UN GAOR, 3d Sess, Supp No 13, UN Doc A/810 (1948) 71, art 1 [UDHR].

74. Tharoor, supra note 71 at 2.

75. Final Declaration of the Regional Meeting for Asia of the World Conference on Human Rights, Bangkok, 17 December 1991, para 8 [Bangkok Declaration].

76. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, 18 December 1979, 1249 UNTS 13; Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, 1577 UNTS 3.

77. DAVIES, Mathew, “States of Compliance?: Global Human Rights Treaties and ASEAN Member States” (2014) 13 Journal of Human Rights 4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78. KHEMARA, Sok, “Mixed Reviews of ASEAN Human Rights Declaration” VOA Khmer (19 December 2012), online: VOA Khmer <http://www.voacambodia.com/content/mixed-reviews-of-asean-rights-declaration/1567319.html>>Google Scholar.

79. KRAFT, Herman Joseph S, “Human Rights, ASEAN and Constructivism: Revisiting the ‘Asian Values’ Discourse” (2001) 22(45) Philippine Political Science Journal 33 at 3334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80. AHRD, supra note 9, art 7.

81. Ibid, art 6.

82. Ibid, art 8.

83. Ibid, art 7 [emphasis added].

84. ASEAN, Joint Communique of 24 th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting (Kuala Lumpur, 19–20 July 1991), para 15; ASEAN, Joint Communique of 25 th ASEAN Ministerial Meeting (Manila, 21–22 July 1992), para 18.

85. Bangkok Declaration, supra note 75, para 8.

86. THOMPSON, Caryl, “Self-Inflicted Harm: The ASEAN Declaration of Human Rights” Global Policy Journal (21 December 2012), online: Global Policy Journal <http://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/21/12/2012/self-inflicted-harm-asean-declaration-human-rights>>Google Scholar.

87. Renshaw, supra note 61 at 569.

88. Ibid.

89. Ibid.

90. Ibid.

91. DESIERTO, Diane A, “Universalizing Core Human Rights in the ‘New’ ASEAN: A Reassessment of Culture and Development Jurisdictions Against the Global Rejection of Impunity” (2009) 1:1 Goettingen Journal of International Law 77 at 82 Google Scholar.

92. Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, UN Doc A/CONF. 157/2 (25 June 1993) (adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights), art 5 [emphasis added].

93. Doyle, supra note 64 at 13.

94. Ibid at 14.

95. Ng, supra note 61.

96. Ibid at 1.

97. GHAI, Yash, “Rights, Social Justice, and Globalization in East Asia” in Joanne R BAUER and Daniel A BELL, eds, The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 241 at 243 Google Scholar; Thio, supra note 46 at 38.

98. MOHAMAD, Dato Seri Dr Mahathir bin, “The Asian Values Debate” (Speech delivered at the 29th International General Meeting of the Pacific Basin Economic Council at Washington, DC, 21 May, 1996)Google Scholar (quoted in Kraft, supra note 79 at 33–34).

99. MAHBUBANI, Kishore, Can Asians Think?, 3rd edn (Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Editions, 2004) at 85 Google Scholar.

100. KAUSIKAN, Bilahari, “Asia’s Different Standard” (1993) 92 Foreign Affairs 24 at 32 Google Scholar.

101. DENNIS, Michael and STEWARD, David, “Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Should There Be an International Complaints Mechanism to Adjudicate the Rights to Food, Water, Housing and Health?” (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law 462 at 464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 16 December 1966, 993 UNTS 3, art 2.

103. DONNELLY, Jack, “Human Rights and Asian Values: A Defense of “Western” Universalism” in Bauer and Bell, eds, supra note 93, 60 at 72 Google Scholar [Donnelly, “A Defense”].

104. Ibid.

105. Ibid at 73.

106. KINGSBURY, Damien and BARTON, Grey, Difference and Tolerance: Human Rights Issues in Southeast Asia (Geelong: Deakin University Press, 1994) at 2 Google Scholar.

107. SEN, Amartya, “Human Rights and Economic Achievements” in Bauer and Bell, eds, supra note 97, 88 at 91 Google Scholar.

108. Kingsbury and Barton, supra note 106 at 3.

109. Donnelly, “A Defense”, supra note 103 at 78.

110. Avonius and Kingsbury, supra note 71.

111. Ibid.

112. Kraft, supra note 79 at 1.

113. Ibid.

114. AHRD, supra note 9, art 6 [emphasis added].

115. ALASTAS, Ali, Ministry for Foreign Affairs and Head of the Delegation of the Republic of Indonesia (Statement before the Second World Conference on Human Rights, Vienna, 14 June 1993) in Letter from Wtijaksana SOEGARDA to the UN Secretary-General (16 June 1993) (UN Doc A/48/214, 18 June 1993), Annex Google Scholar.

116. Amnesty International, Amnesty International’s Briefing to the ASEAN Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Women and Children on the Draft ASEAN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women and Children (London: Amnesty International Publications, 2013) at 12 Google Scholar.

117. Alastas, supra note 115.

118. Ibid.

119. UDHR, supra note 73, art 29.

120. HAMMARBERG, Thomas, “Human Rights and Duties” (1998) 25:4 Media Asia 186 at 187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

121. Amnesty International, supra note 116.

122. Doyle, supra note 64 at 9.

123. CHIRWA, Danwood Mzikenge, “State Responsibility for Human Rights” in Mashood A BADERIN and Manisuli SSENYONJO, eds, International Human Rights Law: Six Decades After the UDHR and Beyond (Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2010), 397 at 401 Google Scholar.

124. The Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, UN Doc E/C.12/2000/13 (1997), para 6.

125. DONNELLY, Jack, Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, 3rd edn (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013) at 10 Google Scholar.

126. Donnelly, “A Defense”, supra note 103 at 79.

127. Ibid.

128. Ibid.

129. Ibid.

130. AHRD, supra note 9, art 8.

131. Human Rights Watch, “Civil Society Denounces Adoption of Flawed ASEAN Human Rights Declaration” (19 November 2012), online: Human Rights Watch <http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/11/19/civil-society-denounces-adoption-flawed-asean-human-rights-declaration>.

132. GIL, Emerlynne and SEIDERMAN, Ian, “ICJ Condemns Fatally Flawed ASEAN Human Rights Declaration” ICJ (19 December 2012), online: ICJ <http://www.icj.org/icj-condemns-fatally-flawed-asean-human-rights-declaration/>>Google Scholar.

133. Doyle, supra note 64 at 9.

134. AHRD, supra note 9, art 8.

135. Renshaw, supra note 61 at 560.

136. Ibid at 571.

137. Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 4 November 1950, 212 UNTS 222 (entered into force 3 September 1953) (as amended), arts 8-10 [ECHR]; African Charter on Human and People’s Rights, 27 June 1981, 1520 UNTS 217 (entered into force 21 October 1986), art 12.

138. Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (adopted 28 November 2013), art 25.

139. Vietnam Criminal Code 1999 (No 15/1999/QH10), art 88.

140. Donnelly, “A Defense”, supra note 103 at 77.

141. YUTAKA, Arai-Takahashi, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp, Oxford, and New York: Intersentia, 2002) at 23 Google Scholar.

142. SCHUTTER, Olivier DE, International Human Rights Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010) at 288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

143. Rotaru v Romania, no 28341/95 (2000) 8 BHRC 449, paras 55–57.

144. Donnelly, “A Defense”, supra note 103 at 77.

145. Durbach, Renshaw, and Byrnes, supra note 61.

146. Phan, supra note 13 at 107.

147. Ibid.

148. MUSCAT, Caroline, “Human Rights Body Has to Be Independent” Times of Malta (31 May 2014), online: Times of Malta <http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20140531/local/Human-rights-body-has-to-be-independent-.521268>>Google Scholar; ASEAN NHRI Forum, “Position Paper Concerning the Political Declaration on the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR)” (Submitted at the 3rd Consultation Meeting with the High Level Panel (HLP), Jakarta, 28 August 2009), online: SEA NHRI Forum <http://www.seanf.asia/index.php/home/joint-statements>.

149. OHCHR, “Principles for Regional Human Rights Mechanisms (Non-Paper)”, online: OHCHR <http://bangkok.ohchr.org/programme/asean/principles-regional-human-rights-mechanisms.aspx> [OHCHR, “Principles”]

150. Ibid.

151. Ibid.

152. Terms of Reference of ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission of Human Rights (July 2009), art 3 [TOR].

153. Ibid, art 5(9)

154. Ibid, art 9

155. Ibid, art 5(2). See also ibid, arts 5(5)-(6).

156. Tan, supra note 61.

157. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 107.

158. Ibid.

159. AMAO, Olufemi, “African Regional Human Rights System” in Baderin and Ssenyonjo, eds, supra note 123, 235 at 242243 Google Scholar.

160. Ibid at 243.

161. TOR, supra note 152, art 2(2).

162. Tan, supra note 61 at 157.

163. TOR, supra note 152, art 4(10).

164. Ibid, art 4(9).

165. DICKENS, BM and COOK, RJ, “Conflict of Interest: Legal and Ethical Aspects” (2006) 92(2) International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 192 at 192193 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

166. De Schutter, supra note 142 at 242.

167. Ibid at 365.

168. MÉGRET, Frédéric, “Nature of Obligations” in Daniel MOECKLI, Sangeeta SHAH, and Sandesh SIVAKUMARAN, eds, International Human Rights Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 96 Google Scholar.

169. HAVEL, Václav and TUTU, Desmond M, “Introduction” in Jared GENSER and Irwin COTLER, eds, Responsibility to Protect (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), xxv at xxviGoogle Scholar.

170. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 106; Drummond, supra note 61 at 4.

171. OHCHR, “Principles”, supra note 149.

172. PASQUALUCCI, Jo, “The Americas” in Moeckli, Shah, and Sivakumaran, eds, supra note 168, 398 at 487 Google Scholar; BANTEKAS, Ilias and OETTE, Lutz, International Human Rights Law and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013) at 219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

173. Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, done in Singapore, 20 November 2007 (entered into force 15 December 2008), art 2(i), online: ASEAN <http://www.asean.org/storage/2012/05/11.-October-2015-The-ASEAN-Charter-18th-Reprint-Amended-updated-on-05_-April-2016-IJP.pdf>; AHRD, supra note 9, arts 36 and 39.

174. TOR, supra note 161, arts 1 and 2.

175. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 106.

176. Ibid.

177. Ibid.

178. FONBUENA, Carmela, “ASEAN Human Rights Body Fails Kin of Massacred Journalists” ABS-CBN News (29 March 2010)Google Scholar, online: ABS-CBN News <http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/03/29/10/asean-humanrights-body-fails-kin-massacred-journalists>.

179. Amao, supra note 159 at 242.

180. Letter from Indonesia’s NGO Coalition for International Human Rights Advocacy to Dr RM Marty Natalegawa (17 December 2013).

181. Ginber, supra note 61 at 517.

182. Ibid.

183. Ibid.

184. TOR, supra note 161, art 4(1).

185. Ibid, art 4(4).

186. Ginber, supra note 61 at 515.

187. Muntarbhorn, “A Roadmap”, supra note 61.

188. AICHR, Annual Report of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: The Annual Report of the AICHR for the Period of July 2014 to July 2015 (1 July 2015) at 4, online: AICHR – Thailand <http://www.aichr.or.th/file_content/article_doc_35.pdf>.

189. See Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13; Vitit MUNTARBHORN, Development of the ASEAN Human Rights Mechanism (Brussels: European Union, 2012) at 4, online: European Parliament <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2012/457120/EXPO-DROI_NT(2012)457120_EN.pdf> (Briefing Paper No EXPO/B/DROI/2012/05); Ary HERMAWAN, “ASEAN Urged to Form Human Rights Court” The Jakarta Post (26 August 2009), online: The Jakarta Post <http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/08/26/asean-urged-form-human-rights-court.html>; “Call to Set Up a Human Rights Court” The Brunei Times (27 December 2013), online: The Brunei Times <http://m.bt.com.bn/frontpage-news-national/2013/12/27/call-set-asean-human-rights-court>.

190. Ibid.

191. VANOVERBEKE, Dimitri and REITERER, Michael, “ASEAN’s Regional Approach to Human Rights: The Limits of the European Model?” (2014) 14 European Yearbook on Human Rights 185 at 194 Google Scholar.

192. Thio, supra note 46 at 78, PHAN, Hao Duy, “Institutions for the Protection of Human Rights in Southeast Asia: A Survey Report” (2009) 31(3) Contemporary Southeast Asia 468 at 490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

193. Ninth International Conference of American States, Res XXXI, Inter-American Court to Protect the Rights of Man, (1948) (quoted in Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 130).

194. OBERLEITNER, Gerd, “Towards an International Court of Human Rights” in Baderin and Ssenyonjo,eds, supra note 123, 359 at 363 Google Scholar.

195. UDHR, supra note 72, art 5; International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, 19 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171, art 8; ECHR, supra note 137, art 3.

196. AHRD, supra note 9, art 5.

197. SHELTON, Dinah, Remedies in International Human Rights Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) at 2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

198. ANKRUMAH, Evelyn A, The African Commission on Human and People’ Rights: Practice and Procedures (Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International, 1996) at 195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

199. BEKKER, Gina, “African Commission on Human Rights and People’s Rights in Relation to Remedies for Human Rights Violations” (2013) 13:3 Human Rights Law Review 499 at 503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

200. Ibid.

201. Ibid.

202. Ankrumah, supra note 198 at 24.

203. Ibid at 196.

204. ODINKALU, Chidi Anselm, “Courting the Court” (1994) 2 African Topics 11 Google Scholar (quoted in Ankrumah, supra note 198 at 196).

205. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 479.

206. Collinge, supra note 7 at 12.

207. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 483.

208. Collinge, supra note 7 at 12.

209. CAVALLARO, James L and BREWER, Stephanie Erin, “Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court” (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 768 at 778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

210. Collinge, supra note 7 at 12.

211. Hermawan, supra note 189.

212. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13.

213. Ibid at 227.

214. Ibid at 132.

215. Ibid at 128.

216. Ibid at 226.

217. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 162.

218. De Schutter, supra note 142 at 903–904.

219. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 226.

220. Organization of African Unity (OAU), Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 10 June 1998 (entered into force 25 January 2004), art 29(2).

221. Phan, supra note 13 at 226.

222. Steiner, Alston, and Goodman, supra note 71 at 1063.

223. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 132.

224. Ibid at 227.

225. Ibid.

226. Yuval SHANY (with Henry LOVAT), “The European Court of Human Rights” in SHANY, Yuval, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014) at 268269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

227. Ibid.

228. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 225.

229. Ibid at 132.

230. Ibid.

231. Ibid at 201.

232. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 45–64.

233. Ibid at 163; African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, “African Court in Brief”, online: African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights <http://en.african-court.org/index.php/about-us/court-in-brief>.

234. MILLER, Vaughne, “The European Convention on Human Rights and the Court of Human Rights: Issues and Reforms” (2011) House of Common Standard Note No SN/IA/5936 at 3, online: UK Parliament <www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN05936.pdf>>Google Scholar.

235. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 185-229.

236. Ibid at 227.

237. Ibid at 201.

238. Ibid at 188.

239. Tan, supra note 61 at 187.

240. Amao, supra note 159 at 242.

241. Phan, A Selective Approach, supra note 13 at 200–201.

242. WAHYUNINGRUM, Yuyun, “ASEAN’s Road Map Towards Creating a Human Rights Regime in Southeast Asia” in Jennifer MOURIN, ed, Human Rights Milestones: Challenges and Developments (Bangkok: Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development, 2009), 69 at 70 Google Scholar.

243. ASEAN Vision 2020, supra note 4 at para 6.

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 1953
Total number of PDF views: 2276 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The ASEAN Human Rights System: A Critical Analysis
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The ASEAN Human Rights System: A Critical Analysis
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The ASEAN Human Rights System: A Critical Analysis
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *