Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T13:31:58.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘The Windows of this Church are of several Fashions’: Architectural Form and Historical Method in John Aubrey’s ‘Chronologia Architectonica’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

Olivia Horsfall Turner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Thomas Rickman has been credited, perhaps for too long, as the first figure to ‘discriminate’ the styles of medieval architecture and create a chronological analysis of Gothic architectural forms. Not only were there several authors who published on the subject immediately before Rickman, but there was also, as early as the mid-seventeenth century, considerable interest in the discernment and classification of periods in medieval architecture. One of the chief figures in this was John Aubrey, who pioneered a method for deducing the date of a medieval building by analysing the shapes of its windows. This intellectual initiative, 150 years before Rickman, has been either overlooked or interpreted as a ‘false start’ in Gothic revivalism. It is, however, worthy of fresh appraisal as a significant development in historical method and as an indicator of one way in which architecture was understood in the seventeenth century. Aubrey’s idea was that objects of a given type, in this case medieval windows, had a particular shape during a particular historical period, and that their morphology could be used to create a system for establishing the date of any given building. The context for this scheme was the innovative proposal of several early modern antiquaries that shapes in themselves could convey historical information, and that specific historical periods had their own distinctive forms. These scholars, many of whom were associated with the Royal Society, took faltering steps towards taxonomies of historical form which foreshadowed the methods of analysis that became — and arguably remain — central to the discipline of architectural history. That their interest focused upon medieval architecture at a time when the Gothic was largely rejected as irregular and barbarous is also notable. Examining the origins of a technique for dating historic buildings through visual analysis reveals how an intellectual circle of the seventeenth century perceived and understood architecture at a time when in England architectural commentary and criticism were still in their infancy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Architectural History , Volume 54 , 2011 , pp. 171 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 For a discussion of Rickman and his precursors, see Simon Bradley, ‘The Englishness of Gothic: Theories and Interpretations from William Gilpin to Parker’, J. H., Architectural History, 45 (2002), pp. 325–46 Google Scholar. The comments on the periodization of medieval architecture that appear in the writings of Roger North, John Evelyn and Christopher Wren are discussed below.

2 The most comprehensive edition remains Brief Lives, chiefly of contemporaries, set down by John Aubrey, between the years 1669 and 1696, ed. Clark, Andrew, 2 vols (Oxford, 1898)Google Scholar. For an overview of Aubrey’s all-encompassing intellectual endeavours, see Hunter, Michael, John Aubrey and the Realm of Learning (London, 1975)Google Scholar, and Poole, William, John Aubrey and the Advancement of Learning (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar.

3 Aubrey, John, Miscellanies (London, 1696)Google Scholar.

4 Aubrey, John, Monumenta Britannica, ed. Fowles, John and Legg, annot. Rodney, 2 vols (Sherborne, 1980, 1982)Google Scholar.

5 Now Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Top. Gen. c. 25, ff. 151r–17or.

6 Bodl., MS Top. Gen. c. 25, f. 153V, where ‘now’ is clarified in brackets as 1656, and f. 159r, where ‘now’ is clarified as 1686.

7 I am currently preparing a full transcript of the text for publication.

8 Colvin, Howard M., ‘Aubrey’s Chronologia Architectonica’, in Concerning Architecture: Essays on Architectural Writers and Writing, Presented to Nikolaus Pevsner, ed. Summerson, John (London, 1968), pp. 1–12 Google Scholar; also reprinted in Essays in English Architectural History, ed. Colvin, Howard M. (New Haven and London, 1999), pp. 206–16 Google Scholar.

9 Colvin, ‘Chronologia’, p. 12.

10 Ibid.

11 de Chambray, Roland Fréart, Parallèle d’Architecture Antique et de la Moderne (Paris, 1650)Google Scholar; Evelyn’s translation and Account appeared in two editions: de Chambray, Roland Fréart, A Parallel of the Antient Architecture with the Modern [...] To which is added an Account of Architects and Architecture, ed. Evelyn, John (London, 1664)Google Scholar; and de Chambray, Roland Fréart, A Parallel of the Antient Architecture with the Modern [...] To which is added an Account of Architects and Architecture. The Second Edition with Large Additions, ed. Evelyn, John (London, 1707)Google Scholar.

12 For transcripts and analysis of Wren’s works on architecture, see Soo, Lydia M., Wren’s ‘Tracts’ on Architecture and Other Writings (Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar.

13 Of Building: Roger North’s Writings on Architecture, ed. Colvin, Howard M. and Newman, John (Oxford, 1981)Google Scholar.

14 On the study of the past in the seventeenth century, see Douglas, David, English Scholars, 1600–1730 (London, 1951)Google Scholar; English Historical Scholarship in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, ed. Fox, Levi (London, 1956)Google Scholar; Fussner, Frank S., The Historical Revolution: English Historical Writing and Thought 1380–1640 (London, 1962)Google Scholar; Parry, Graham, The Trophies of Time: English Antiquarians of the Seventeenth Century (Oxford, 1995)Google Scholar. On Aubrey as an historian, see Hunter, Aubrey, pp. 148–208; and Poole, Aubrey, pp. 86–90.

15 Bacon, Francis, The Twoo Bookes of Francis Bacon: Of the Proficience and Advancement of Learning, Divine and Humane (London, 1605)Google Scholar.

16 Ibid., II.2.3, 11.

17 On the shift from text to object in historical source material, see Woolf, D. R., ‘The Dawn of the Artefact: the Antiquarian Impulse in England, 1500–1730’, Studies in Medievalism, 4 (1990), pp. 5–35 Google Scholar; and Vine, Angus, In Defiance of Time: Antiquarian Writing in Early Modern England (Oxford, 2010), pp. 22–50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Aubrey, John, The Natural History and Antiquities of the County of Surrey. Begun in the year 1673 by John Aubrey and Continued to the Present Time. Illustrated with Proper Sculptures, 5 vols (London, 1718–19), I, p. 404 Google Scholar.

19 Bodl., MS Top. Gen. c. 25, f. 3V.

20 On the cultural context of microscopy, see Fournier, Marian, The Fabric of Life: Microscopy in the Seventeenth Century (Baltimore and London, 1996)Google Scholar.

21 Hooke, Robert, Micrographia; or, Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses, with Observations and Inquiries thereupon (London, 1665)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Bodl., MS Top. Gen. c. 25, f. 17or.

23 Ibid., f. 153r.

24 Ibid., f. l7or.

25 Wanley, Humfrey, ‘Part of a Letter, Written to a Most Reverend Prelate, in Answer to One Written by His Grace, Judging of the Age of MSS, the Style of Learned Authors, Painters, Musicians, etc. By Mr Humfrey Wanley’, Philosophical Transactions, 24 (1704–05), pp. 1993–2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar (pp. 1995–96).

26 Bodl., MS Top. Gen. c. 25, f. 153r.

27 Ibid., f. 153V.

28 Ibid., f. 168v.

29 Ibid., ff. 152V, 154r.

30 This appears in Evelyn’s Account, appended to the first edition of Fréart de Chambray, Parallel, ed. Evelyn, p. 120.

31 Ibid., p. 113.

32 Ibid., p. 113.

33 Ibid., p. 114.

34 Ibid., p. 113.

35 On the creation of a universal language, see Lewis, Rhodri, Language, Mind and Nature: Artificial Languages in England from Bacon to Locke (Cambridge, 2007)Google Scholar.

36 Wilkins, John, An Essay towards a Real Character, and Philosophical Language (London, 1668)Google Scholar. For an account of the circumstances, see Lewis, Rhodri, ‘The Efforts of the Aubrey Correspondence Group to Revise John Wilkins’s Essay (1668) and Their Context’, Historiographia Linguistica, 28 (2001), pp. 333–66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Soo, Wren’s ‘Tracts’, pp. 37–38.

38 North, Of Building, ed. Colvin and Newman, pp. 110-12.

39 See Buchanan, Alexandrina, ‘Interpretations of Medieval Architecture, c. 1550–c. 1750’, in Gothic Architecture and its Meanings 1330–1830, ed. Hall, Michael (Reading, 2002), pp. 25–50 Google Scholar; and Turner, Olivia Horsfall, ‘Perceptions of Medieval Buildings in England, c. 1640–c. 1720’ (unpublished doctoral thesis, University College London, 2009)Google Scholar.

40 This characterization of Gothic appears in the extended version of Evelyn’s Account, appended to the second edition of Fréart de Chambray, Parallel, ed. John Evelyn, pp. 9–10. See also Downes, Kerry, ‘John Evelyn and Architecture: a First Inquiry’, in Concerning Architecture, ed. Summerson, , pp. 28–39 Google Scholar (pp. 34–35).

41 Bodl., MS Top. Gen. c. 25, f. 168r; Aubrey, Surrey, IV, p. 84.

42 Bodl., MS Top. Gen. c. 25, f. 157V.

43 Casaubon, Meric, A Treatise of Use and Custome (London, 1628)Google Scholar.

44 Bodl., MS Top. Gen. c. 25, f. 5V.

45 Casaubon, A Treatise of Use, p. 80.

46 Ibid., p. 83.

47 Quoted in Soo, Wren’s ‘Tracts’, p. 154, and dated by Soo to the mid-1670s.

48 Casaubon, A Treatise of Use, p. 84.

49 Ibid., p. 86.

50 For details of Inghirami’s hoax, see Rowland, Ingrid D. , The Scarith of Scornello: a Tale of Renaissance Forgery (Chicago, 2004)Google Scholar.

51 Casaubon, A Treatise of Use, pp. 87–88.

52 On Morelli’s method, see Ginzburg, Carlo, ‘Morelli, Freud, and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and Scientific Method’, History Workshop Journal, 9 (1980), pp. 5–36 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

53 Casaubon, A Treatise of Use, p. 87.

54 Ibid., p. 81.

55 Ibid., p. 89.

56 Ibid., p. 88.

57 Bodl., MS Top. Gen. c. 25, f. 185r.

58 Ibid., f. 185r.

59 Ibid., f. 197r.

60 Quoted in Bennett, Kate, ‘John Aubrey’s Oxfordshire Collections: an Edition of Aubrey’s Annotations to his Presentation Copy of Robert Plot’s Natural History of Oxford-shire, Bodleian Library Ashmole 1722’, Oxoniensia, 64 (1999), pp. 59–86 Google Scholar (p. 77).

61 Aubrey, Surrey, IV, pp. 84, 41.

62 Ibid., p. 19.

63 Casaubon, A Treatise of Use, p. 90.

64 Ashmole, Elias, The Antiquities of Berkshire, 3 vols (London, 1723)Google Scholar.

65 Ibid., 11, p. 195.

66 The main source for Somner’s life is White Kennett, ‘Life of The Author’, in William Somner, A Treatise of Gavelkind [...] To which is Added, the Life of the Author. For a discussion of Somner’s antiquarian activities, see William Urry’s introductory essay in Somner, William, The Antiquities of Canterbury, ed. Battely, Nicolas, 2nd edn (London, 1703)Google Scholar, facs. edn with a new introduction by William Urry (Wakefield, 1977), and Parry, Graham, ‘An Incipient Medievalist in the Seventeenth Century: William Somner of Canterbury’, Studies in Medievalism, 9 (1997) pp. 58–65 Google Scholar.

67 Somner, William, The Antiquities of Canterbury; or a Survey of that Ancient Citie, with the Suburbs and Cathedrall [...] Also Mr. Somner’s Discourse called Chartham-News [...] Illustrated and Adorned with Several Useful and Fair Sculptures, ed. Battely, Nicolas, 2nd edn (London, 1703)Google Scholar, preface, unpaginated.

68 Kennett, ‘Life’, p. 10.

69 Serjeantson, R.W., ‘(Florence Estienne) Meric Casaubon’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography at http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/4852 (accessed on 1 October 2010)Google Scholar.

70 North, On Building, ed. Colvin and Newman, p. 117.

71 Ibid., p. 142.

72 Wanley, ‘Part of a Letter’, p. 1993. The letter is addressed ‘to a Most Reverend Prelate’ who is referred to as ‘His Grace’, which means that the figure, otherwise unidentified, must be an archbishop. It was probably the archbishop of Canterbury, William Wake, as he was an active supporter of the Society for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge, in which Wanley served as secretary.

73 Ibid., p. 1993.

74 Ibid., p. 1997.

75 Ibid., p. 2006.

76 On Rudbeck, see Eriksson, Gunnar, ‘The Atlantic Vision: Olaus Rudbeck and Baroque Science’, Uppsala Studies in History of Science, 19 (Canton, MA, 1994)Google Scholar. See also Ekman, Ernst, ‘Gothic Patriotism and Olof Rudbeck’, The Journal of Modem History, 34/1 (March 1962), pp. 52–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Bodl., MS Top. Gen. c. 25, f. 152V.

78 Quoted in Eriksson, ‘The Atlantic Vision’, p. 40.

79 Rudbeck, Olof, Atlantis (Uppsala, 1679)Google Scholar.

80 On geology in the early modern period, see Rudwick, Martin, Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geo-history in the Age of Revolution (Chicago, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Lindroth, Sten, ‘The Two Faces of Linnaeus’, in Linnaeus, The Man and His Work, ed. Frängsmyr, Tore (Berkeley, 1983), pp. 1–62 Google Scholar.

82 Aubrey, , Surrey, v, p. xiii Google Scholar.

83 Perry, Francis, A Series of English Medals (London, 1762)Google Scholar.

84 North, On Building, ed. Colvin and Newman, p. 114.