Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-jcfbx Total loading time: 0.332 Render date: 2022-01-23T07:20:44.167Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Talk about the passion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2010

Extract

We would like to thank the five commentators for their thorough and stimulating reflections on, and criticism of, our article. The different comments raise various issues, and we appreciate their diversity of perspectives and their analysis of problems in our attempt at a rethinking of emotion in archaeology. The comments are each in their own way highly rewarding for us, and they certainly bring concerns to the fore that we have left out. Here we identify several issues that the commentators address in different voices and with varying intensities, and would like to examine these in turn. First, we consider the question of ritual at Mount Pleasant and the absence of the quotidian from our account. Second, we engage with the worry expressed over the lack of specificity of emotions in our given scenarios. Third, the phenomenological perspective in our article is given some critical thought. Fourth, we address the important point on which several of the commentators agree: that we leave out how emotions unfold in historically specific and context-dependent situations. Finally we turn back to the issue of our vocabulary to see how it stands the test of both application and critique.

Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdi, K., 2001: Nationalism, politics, and the development of archaeology in Iran, American journal of archaeology 105, 5176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S., 2004: The cultural politics of emotion, London.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R.P., 1971: The affecting presence. An essay in humanistic anthropology, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Barber, M., 2004: Mount Pleasant from the air, Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeology Society 126, 714.Google Scholar
Barber, M., 2005: Mount Pleasant, Dorchester. Cropmarks old and new, Past. The newsletter of the Prehistoric Society 49, 57.Google Scholar
Barkan, L., 1999: Unearthing the past. Archaeology and aesthetics in the making of Renaissance culture, New Haven.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., 1994: Fragments from antiquity. An archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C., 2001: Agency, the duality of structure, and the problem of the archaeological record, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory today, Cambridge, 141–64.Google Scholar
Bateson, G., 1986: Naven, Stanford.Google Scholar
Battaglia, D., 1990: On the bones of the serpent. Person, memory and mortality in Sabarl Island society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bell, C., 1992: Ritual theory, ritual practice, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bell, C., 1997: Ritual. Perspectives and dimensions, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bender, B. and Winer, M. (eds), 2001: Contested landscapes. Movement, exile and place, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bennett, T. and Joyce, P. (eds), 2010: Material powers. Cultural studies, history and the material turn, London.Google Scholar
Berggren, Å., forthcoming. Med kärret som källa. Om begreppen offer och ritual inom arkeologin, Lund: Nordic Academic Press (Vägar till Midgård 13).Google Scholar
Bille, M., Hastrup, F. and Sørensen, T.F., 2010: Introduction, in Bille, M., Hastrup, F. and Sørensen, T.F. (eds), An anthropology of absence. Materializations of transcendence and loss, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, P., 1999: Psychological anthropology. Continuity and change in the study of human action, Prospect Heights, IL.Google Scholar
Böhme, G., 1992: Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics, Thesis eleven 36, 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollnow, O.F., 1963: Mensch und Raum, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1973: The Berber house, in Douglas, M. (ed.), Rules and meanings, Harmondsworth, 98110.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1993: The field of cultural production. Essays on art and literature, New York.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1975: Maumbury Rings, Dorchester. The excavations of 1908–13, Archaeologia 105, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., 2000: An archaeology of natural places, London.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 2003: A life less ordinary. The ritualization of the domestic sphere in Later Prehistoric Europe, Cambridge archaeological journal 13 (1), 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., 2005: Ritual and domestic life in Prehistoric Europe, New York.Google Scholar
Brown, B., 2003: A sense of things. The object matter of American literature, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brück, J., 1998: In the footsteps of the ancestors, a review of Christopher Tilley's ‘A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, monuments’, Archaeological review from Cambridge 15, 2336.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 1999: Ritual and rationality. Some problems of interpretation in European archaeology, European journal of archaeology 2, 313–44.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 2001: Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7 (4), 649–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brück, J., 2005. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory, Archaeological dialogues 12 (1), 4572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, H., 1993: Beakers. Deconstruction and after, Proceeding of the Prehistoric Society 59, 241–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, C., 1993: Worlds of sense. Exploring senses in history and across cultures. London.Google Scholar
Cleal, R.M.J., 1999: Introduction. The what, where, when and why of grooved ware, in Cleal, R.M.J. and MacSween, A. (eds), Grooved ware in Britain and Ireland, Oxford, 18.Google Scholar
Clough, A.T. and Halley, J. (eds), 2007: The affective turn. Theorizing the social, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J., 1991: Of revelation and revolution, Volume 1, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A.R., 1996: Descartes’ error. Emotion, reason and the human brain, London.Google Scholar
Damasio, A.R., 1999: The feeling of what happens. Body and emotion in the making of consciousness, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., Bondi, L. and Smith, M. (eds), 2005: Emotional geographies, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Davies, S.M., Bellamy, P.S., Heaton, M.J. and Woodward, P.J., 2002: Excavations at Alington Avenue, Fordington, Dorchester, Dorset, 1984–7, Dorchester.Google Scholar
De Certeau, M., 1988: The practice of everyday life, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., 1983: Cinema 1. The movement image, London.Google Scholar
Dietler, M., 1994: ‘Our ancestors the Gauls’. Archaeology, ethnic nationalism, and the manipulation of Celtic identity in modern Europe, American anthropologist 96 (3), 584605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, R.J., 2002: Emotion, cognition, and behavior, Science new series 298 (5596), 1191–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E., 1965 (1915): The elementary forms of religious life, New York.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., 1980: The face of Man. Expressions of universal emotions in a New Guinea village, New York.Google Scholar
Fernandez, J., 1965: Symbolic consensus in a Fang reformative cult, American anthropologist 67, 902–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, J., 1986: Persuasions and performances. The play of tropes in culture, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Fogelin, L., 2007: The archaeology of religious ritual, Annual review of anthropology 36, 5571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, L., 2008: Delegitimizing religion. The archaeology of religion as . . . archaeology?, in Whitley, D.S. and Hays-Gilpin, K. (eds), Belief in the past. Theoretical approaches to the archaeology of religion, Walnut Creek, CA, 129–42.Google Scholar
Forty, A., 1995: Objects of desire. Design and society since 1750, London.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., 2000: The individual, the subject, and archaeological interpretation. Reading Luce Irigaray and Judith Butler, in Holtorf, C. and Karlsson, H. (eds), Philosophy and archaeological practice. Perspectives for the 21st century, Gothenburg, 107–33.Google Scholar
Gell, A., 1998: Art and agency. An anthropological theory, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gerholm, T., 1988: On ritual. A postmodernist view, Ethnos 53, 190203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A., 2004: Round in circles. Timber circles, henges and stone circles: some possible relations and transformation, in Cleal, R.M.J. and Pollard, J. (eds), Monuments and material culture. Papers in honour of an Avebury archaeologist: Isobel Smith, Salisbury, 7882.Google Scholar
Goody, J., 1977: Against ritual. Loosely structured thoughts on a loosely defined topic, in Moore, S.F. and Myerhoff, B.G. (eds), Secular ritual, New York, 2535.Google Scholar
Goody, J., 1988: The interface between the written and the oral, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goody, J., 1989: The logic of writing and the organization of society, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gosden, C., 2004: Aesthetics, intelligence, and emotions. Implications for archaeology, in Demarrais, E., Gosden, C. and Renfrew, C. (eds), Rethinking materiality. The engagement of mind with the material world, 3340, Cambridge (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research Vols.).Google Scholar
Gosden, C., 2005: What do objects want? Journal of archaeological method and theory 12 (3), 193211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handelman, D. and Lindquist, G. (eds), 2004: Ritual in its own right, New York.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (ed.), 1986: The social construction of emotions, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris, O.J.T., 2006: Identity, memory and emotion in Neolithic Dorset, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of History and Archaeology, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
Harris, O.J.T., 2009: Making places matter in Early Neolithic Dorset, Oxford journal of archaeology 28 (2), 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, O.J.T., in press: Emotional and mnemonic geographies at Hambledon Hill. Texturing Neolithic places with bodies and bones. Cambridge archaeological journal 20 (3).Google Scholar
Hawkes, C., 1954: Archaeological theory and method. Some suggestions from the Old World, American anthropologist 56 (2),155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1962: Being and time, New York.Google Scholar
Henare, A.,Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S., 2007: Thinking through things, in Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. (eds), Thinking through things. Theorising artefacts ethnographically. London, 131.Google Scholar
Hinton, A., 1993: Prolegomenon to a processual approach to the emotions, Ethos 21 (4), 417–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. and Hutson, S., 2003: Reading the past. Current approaches to interpretation in archaeology, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbraad, M., 2007: The power of powder. Multiplicity and motion in the divinatory cosmology of Cuban Ifá (or mana, again), in Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S. (eds), Thinking through things. Theorising artefacts ethnographically. London, 189225.Google Scholar
Holland, D.,Lachicotte, W. Jr., Skinner, D. and Cain, C., 1998: Identity and agency in cultural worlds, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Houseman, M. and Severi, C., 1998: Naven or the other self. A relational approach to ritual action, Leiden.Google Scholar
Howe, D. (ed.) 1991: The varieties of sensory experience. A sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses, Toronto.Google Scholar
Humphrey, C. and Laidlaw, J., 1994: The archetypical actions of ritual. A theory of ritual illustrated by the Jain rite of worship, Oxford.Google Scholar
Inomata, T. and Coben, L.S. (eds), 2006: Archaeology of performance. Theaters of power, community, and politics, New York.Google Scholar
James, W., 1884: What is an emotion?, Mind 9 (34), 188205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W., 1890: Principles of psychology, Vols. 1 and 2, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., 2006: On the nature of theoretical archaeology and archaeological theory, Archaeological dialogues 13 (2), 117–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A., 2002: Archaeological theory and scientific practice, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jones, A., 2007: Memory and material culture, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, D.I., 1988: Ritual, politics, and power, New Haven.Google Scholar
Khatchadourian, L., 2008: Making nations from the ground up. Traditions of classical archaeology in the South Caucasus, American journal of archaeology 112 (2), 247–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnes, I.A.,Gibson, A.M., Ambers, J., Bowman, S., Leese, M. and Boast, R., 1991: Radiocarbon dating and British beakers. The British Museum programme. Scottish archaeological review 8, 3568.Google Scholar
Köepping, K-P., 1997: The ludic as creative disorder. Framing, de-framing, and boundary crossing, in Köepping, K-P. (ed.), The games of god and man. Essays in play and performance, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Kohl, P.L. and Fawcett, C.P., 1995: Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kus, S., 1992: Towards an archaeology of body and soul, in Gardin, J.-C. and Peebles, C. (eds), Representations in archaeology, Bloomington, 168–77.Google Scholar
Kus, S., 2006: In the midst of the moving waters. Material, metaphor and feminist archaeology, in Stockett, M. and Geller, P. (eds), Feminist anthropology. Present, past, and future, University Park, PA, 105–19.Google Scholar
Kus, S. and Raharijaona, V., 1998: Between Earth and Sky there are only a few large boulders. Sovereignty and monumentality in Central Madagascar, Journal of anthropological archaeology 17, 5379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyriakidis, E. (ed.), 2007: The archaeology of ritual, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1993: We have never been modern, New York.Google Scholar
Leavitt, J., 1996: Meaning and feeling in the anthropology of emotions, American ethnologist 23 (3), 514–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leder, D., 1990: The absent body, Chicago.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1964–65: Le Geste et la parole, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
Levine, R., 1999: An agenda for psychological anthropology, Ethos 27 (2), 1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C., 1962: La Pensée sauvage, Paris.Google Scholar
Levy, R., 1973: Tahitians. Mind and experience in the Society Islands, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lewis, G., 1980: Day of shining red. An essay on understanding ritual, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löfgren, O., 2008: Motion and emotion. Learning to be a railway traveller, Mobilities 3 (3), 331–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longworth, I.H., 1979: The Neolithic and Bronze Age pottery, in Wainwright, G.J. (ed.), Mount Pleasant, Dorset. Excavations 1970–1971, London, 75124.Google Scholar
Lupton, D., 1998: The emotional self, London.Google Scholar
Lutz, C., 1988: Unnatural emotions. Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to Western theory, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. and Abu-Lughod, L. (eds), 1990: Language and the politics of emotions, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. and White, G.M., 1986: The anthropology of emotions, Annual review of anthropology 15, 405–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschio, T., 1998: The narrative and counter-narrative of the gift. Emotional dimensions of ceremonial exchange in southwestern New Britain, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (1), 83100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massumi, B., 2002: Parables for the virtual. Movement, affect, sensation, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, M., 2002 (1923): The gift. The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies, London.Google Scholar
Meskell, L., 1996. The somatization of archaeology. Institutions, discourses, corporality. Norwegian archaeological review 29 (1), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L., 1998. Intimate archaeologies. The case of Kha and Merit. World archaeology 29 (3), 363–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L., 1999: Archaeologies of social life. Age, sex, et cetera in ancient Egypt, Oxford.Google Scholar
Meskell, L., 2004: Object worlds in ancient Egypt. Material biographies past and present. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Middleton, D., 1989: Emotional style. The cultural ordering of emotions, Ethos, 17 (2), 187201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., 2005: Materiality. An introduction, in Miller, D. (ed.), Materiality, Durham, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, K. and Svašek, M. (eds), 2007: Mixed emotions. Anthropological studies of feeling, Oxford.Google Scholar
Needham, S., 2005: Transforming Beaker culture in north-west Europe. Processes of fusion and fission, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71, 171217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngai, S., 2005: Ugly feelings, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Nilsson Stutz, L., 2003. Embodied rituals & ritualized bodies. Tracing ritual practices in late Mesolithic burials, Stockholm (Acta Archaeologica Lundensia, No. 46).Google Scholar
Noble, G., 2006: Neolithic Scotland. Timber, stone, earth and fire, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ong, W., 1982: Orality and literacy. Technologizing the word, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, W., 1991: The shifting sensorium, in Howe, D. (ed.), The varieties of sensory experience. A sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses, Toronto, 2530.Google Scholar
Overing, J. and Passes, A. (eds), 2000: The anthropology of love and anger. The aesthetics of conviviality in native Amazonia, London.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J., 1998: Affective neuroscience. The foundations of human and animal emotions, Oxford (Series in Affective Science).Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 2007: The Stonehenge riverside project. Excavations at the east entrance of Durrington Walls, in Larsson, M. and Pearson, M. Parker (eds), From Stonehenge to the Baltic. Living with cultural diversity in the third millennium BC, Oxford, 125–44.Google Scholar
Parrott, F.R., 2005: ‘It's not forever’. The material culture of hope, Journal of material culture 10 (3), 245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, M., 2001: Excavating the Sanctuary. New investigations on Overton Hill, Avebury, Wiltshire archaeological and natural history magazine 94, 123.Google Scholar
Pollard, J. and Robinson, D.E., 2007: A return to Woodhenge, in Larsson, M. and Pearson, M. Parker (eds), From Stonehenge to the Baltic. Living with cultural diversity in the third millennium BC, Oxford, 159–68.Google Scholar
Pollard, J., 1992: The Sanctuary, Overton Hill, Wiltshire. A re-examination. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58, 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J., 2001: The aesthetics of depositional practice, World archaeology 33, 315–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probyn, E., 2005: Blush. Faces of shame. Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Pryor, F., 1998: Etton. Excavations at a Neolithic causewayed enclosure near Maxey, Cambridgeshire, 1982–7, London.Google Scholar
Radin, P., 1957: Primitive man as philosopher, New York.Google Scholar
Raharijaona, V. and Kus, S., 2000: Where to begin a house foundation. Betsileo ‘mpanandro’ and the (re)creation of tradition, in Allibert, C. and Rajaonarimanana, N. (eds.), L'Extraordinaire et le quotidien. Variations anthropologiques, Paris, 135–44.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, M., 2002: Heidegger's attunement and the neuropsychology of emotion, Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 1 (3), 287312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, M., 2008: Feelings of being. Phenomenology, psychiatry and the sense of reality, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, W.M., 2001: Navigation of feeling. A framework for the history of emotions, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1973: Monuments, mobilization, and social organization in Neolithic Wessex, in Renfrew, C. (ed.), The explanation of culture change. Models in prehistory, London, 539–58.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1994: The archaeology of religion, in Renfrew, C. (ed.), The ancient mind, Cambridge, 4754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, A. and Rudnyckyj, D., 2009: Economies of affect, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15 (1), 5777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, M.Z., 1984: Toward an anthropology of self and feeling, in Shweder, R.A. and LeVine, R.A. (eds), Culture theory. Essays on mind, self, and emotion, Cambridge, 137–57.Google Scholar
Runia, E., 2006: Presence. History and theory 45 (February), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seremetakis, C.N., 1991: The last word. Women, death, and divination in Inner Mani, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M., 1999: Emotion and movement. A beginning empirical–phenomenological analysis of their relationship, Journal of consciousness studies 6 (11–12), 259–77.Google Scholar
Sheller, M., 2004: Automotive emotions. Feeling the car. Theory, culture & society 21 (4–5), 221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore, B., 1993: Emotion: Culture, psychology, biology, Ethos 21 (3), 357–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, R., 1999: Why cultural psychology? Ethos 27 (1), 6273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, K., 2007: Practice, spatiality and embodied emotions. An outline of a geography of practice, Human affairs 17, 168–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.Z., 1982: Imagining religion from Babylon to Jonestown, Chicago.Google Scholar
Smith, R.J.C.,Healy, F., Allen, M.J., Morris, E.L., Barnes, I. and Woodward, P.J., 1997: Excavations along the route of the Dorchester by-pass, Dorset, 1986–8, Salisbury.Google Scholar
Sørensen, T.F., 2009: The presence of the dead. Cemeteries, cremation and the staging of non-place, Journal of social archaeology 9 (1), 110–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, T.F., 2010. An archaeology of movement. Materiality, affects and cemeteries in prehistoric and contemporary Odsherred, Denmark, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Aarhus.Google Scholar
Stets, J.E. and Turner, J.H. (eds), 2006: Handbook of the sociology of emotions, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, K., 2007: Ordinary affects, Durham, NC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, E., 2008: The disjunctive approach to the archaeological analysis of ritual politics, in Fogelin, L., Religion, archaeology, and the material world, Carbdondale, IL, 237–60.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S.J., 1979: A performative approach to ritual, Proceedings of the British Academy 65, 113–69.Google Scholar
Tarlow, S., 1999: Bereavement and commemoration. An archaeology of mortality, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tarlow, S., 2000: Emotion in archaeology, Current anthropology 41 (5), 713–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoits, P.A., 1989: The sociology of emotions, Annual review of sociology 15, 317–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., 1996: Time, culture and identity. An interpretive archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1999: Understanding the Neolithic, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2000: The identity of place in Neolithic Britain. Examples from Southwest Scotland, in Ritchie, A. (ed.), Neolithic Orkney in its European context, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2002: Archaeology's humanism and the materiality of the body, in Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennik, M. and Tarlow, S. (eds), Thinking through the body. Archaeologies of corporeality. London, 2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., 2007: The internal features at Durrington Walls. Investigations in the southern and western enclosures 2005–6, in Larsson, M. and Parker, M. Pearson (eds), From Stonehenge to the Baltic. Living with cultural diversity in the third millennium BC, Oxford, 145–57.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2010: The return of the Rinyo-Clacton folk? The cultural significance of the Grooved Ware complex in later Neolithic Britain. Cambridge archaeological journal 20 (1), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treherne, P., 1995: The warrior's beauty. The masculine body and self-identity in Bronze-Age Europe, Journal of European archaeology 3, 105–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuan, Y.-F., 1974: Topophilia. A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values, Englewood.Google Scholar
Turnbull, C., 1978: The politics of non-aggression (Zaire), in Montague, A. (ed.), Learning non-aggression. The experience of non-literate societies, New York, 161221.Google Scholar
Turner, V., 1967: The forest of symbols. Aspects of Ndembu ritual, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Turner, V., 1982: From ritual to theatre. The human seriousness of play, New York.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, R.M., 2009: Chaco reloaded. Discursive social memory on the post-Chacoan landscape, Journal of social archaeology, 9 (2), 220–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G.J., 1979: Mount Pleasant, Dorset. Excavations 1970–1971, London.Google Scholar
Webmoor, T. and Witmore, C.L., 2008: Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social archaeology’. Norwegian archaeological review 41 (1), 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A., 2005: Lived experience in the Early Neolithic of the Great Hungarian Plain, in Bailey, D., Whittle, A. and Cummings, V. (eds), (Un)Settling the Neolithic, Oxford, 6470.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A., 2003: Emotion and culture. Arguing with Martha Nussbaum, Ethos 31 (4), 577600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A., 2002: Beads and beakers. Heirlooms and relics in the British Early Bronze Age, Antiquity 76, 1040–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, P.J., Davies, S.M. and Graham, A.H., 1993: Excavations at the old Methodist chapel and Greyhound Yard, Dorchester 1981–1984, Dorchester.Google Scholar
Zumthor, P., 2006: Atmospheres. Architectural environments, surrounding objects, Basel.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Talk about the passion
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Talk about the passion
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Talk about the passion
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *