Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Ecophysiological responses of invasive and indigenous mytilids in the Ría de Vigo (NW Spain)

  • Jose M.F. Babarro (a1) and Malwenn Lassudrie (a2)

Abstract

The impact of an alien species is correlated with its abundance and potential to colonise new environments. Consequently, the crucial aspects that give a mytilid species invasive potential include its strength and capacity for adhesion to a wide variety of substrates and its ecological tolerance to environmental conditions. The alien black pygmy mussel Xenostrobus securis settles together with the indigenous and raft cultured mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis on hard substrates of the inner coastline of the Ría de Vigo (Atlantic Coast NW Spain). Key parameters for the ecological success of these species could include their byssus structure and ecological plasticity. In this study, we assessed their comparative ability to attach to different substrates under different environmental conditions, using both in situ and laboratory approaches. Byssus threads secreted by X. securis were found to be extremely thin and their thickness did not vary with mussel size. This thinness of byssus filaments in X. securis was compensated by the secretion of a huge number (up to thousand of byssus filaments). Although no increase in attachment strength was found with increasing mussel size in this species, multiple byssus thread secretion might be a key factor in the successful invasion of inner areas of the estuary. Furthermore, X. securis exposes a much lower shell area to lift and drag forces in mussel conglomerates. By contrast, the indigenous species M. galloprovincialis secretes thicker byssus threads, which provide stronger in situ attachment displaying a linear increase in strength relative to the size of mussels. The exposure of both mytilid species to different abiotic factors in the laboratory confirmed the weaker byssus secretion and limited variation in attachment strength in the alien species. On one hand, X. securis seemed to be better adapted to life on soft bottoms and not capable of much plasticity when attached to different substrates. However, X. securis might be also well adapted to variable environmental conditions, e.g., salinity fluctuations, with no need to modify its byssus properties to ensure secure attachment. Attachment strength of M. galloprovincialis was higher than X. securis in all abiotic conditions tested. Results are discussed in relation to the ecological tolerance and impact of these mytilid species.

Copyright

Corresponding author

aCorresponding author: jbabarro@iim.csic.es

References

Hide All
[1]Ackerman, J.D., 1999, Effect of velocity on the filter feeding of dreissenid mussels (Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena bugensis): implications for trophic dynamics. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 15511561.
[2]Allen, J.A., Cook, M., Jackson, D.J., Preston, S., Worth, E.M., 1976, Observations on the rate of production and mechanical properties of the byssus threads of Mytilus edulis L. J. Mollusc. Stud. 42, 279289.
[3]Babarro, J.M.F., Fernández-Reiriz, M.J., Labarta, U., 2000, Feeding behaviour of seed mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis: environmental parameters and seed origin. J. Shellfish Res. 145, 204213.
[4]Babarro, J.M.F., Fernández-Reiriz, M.J., 2010, Secretion of byssal threads in Mytilus galloprovincialis after spawning stress. J. Comp. Physiol. B 180, 95104.
[5]Babarro, J.M.F., Carrington, E., 2011, Byssus secretion of Mytilus galloprovincialis: effect of site at macro- and micro-geographical scales within Ría de Vigo (NW Spain). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 435, 125140.
[6]Bell, E.C., Gosline, J.M., 1996, Mechanical design of mussel byssus: material yield enhances attachment strength. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 10051017.
[7]Bell, E.C., Gosline, J.M., 1997, Strategies for life in flow: tenacity, morphometry, and probability of dislodgement of two Mytilus species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 159, 197208.
[8]Bownes, S.J., McQuaid, D., 2010, Mechanisms of habitat segregation between an invasive (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and an indigenous (Perna perna) mussel: adult growth and mortality. Mar. Biol. 157, 17991810.
[9]Brazee, S.L., Carrington, E., 2006, Interspecific comparison of the mechanical properties of mussel byssus. Biol. Bull. 211, 263274.
[10]Brenner, M., Buck, B.H., 2010, Attachment properties of blue mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) byssus threads on culture-based artificial collector substrates. Aquac. Eng. 42, 128139.
[11]Braby, C.E., Somero, G.N., 2006, Following the heart: temperature and salinity effects on heart rate in native and invasive species of blue mussels (genus Mytilus). J. Exp. Biol. 209, 25542566.
[12]Brown, C.H., 1952, Some structural proteins of Mytilus edulis L. Quart. J. Microsc. Sci. 93, 487502.
[13]Buck, B.H., Buchholz, C.M., 2005, Response of offshore cultivated Laminaria saccharina to hydrodynamic forcing in the North Sea. Aquaculture 250, 674691.
[14]Burkett, J.R., Wojtas, J.L., Cloud, J.L., Wilker, J.J., 2009, A method for measuring the adhesion strength of marine mussels, J. Adhesion 85, 601615.
[15]Byers, J.E., 2000, Differential susceptibility to hypoxia aids estuarine invasion. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 203, 123132.
[16]Carrington, E., 2002, Seasonal variation in the attachment strength of the blue mussel: causes and consequences. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47, 17231733.
[17]Carrington, E., Moeser, G.M., Thompson, S.B., Coutts, L.C., Craig, C.A., 2008, Mussel attachment on rocky shores: the effect of flow on byssus production. Int. Comp. Biol. 48, 801807.
[18]Connell, J.H., 1961, The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42, 710723.
[19]Darrigran, G., 2002, Potential impact of filter-feeding invaders on temperate inland freshwater environments. Biol. Invasions 4, 145156.
[20]Dayton, P.K., 1971, Competition, disturbance and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky shore intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 41, 351389.
[21]Dutton, J.M., Hofmann, G.E., 2008, Spatial and temporal variation in distribution and protein ubiquitination for Mytilus congeners in the California hybrid zone. Mar. Biol. 154, 10671075.
[22]Filgueira, R., Peteiro, L.G., Labarta, U., Fernández-Reiriz, M.J., 2007, Assessment of spat collector ropes in Galician mussel farming. Aquac. Eng. 37, 195201.
[23]Garci, M.E., Trigo, J.E., Pascual, S., Gonzalez, A.F., Rocha, F., Guerra, A., 2007, Xenostrobus securis (Lamarck, 1819) (Mollusca: Bivalvia): first report of an introduced species in Galician waters. Aquac. Int. 15, 1924.
[24]Griffiths, C.L., Hockey, P.A.R., 1987, A model describing the interactive roles of predation, competition and tidal elevation in structuring mussel population. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 5, 547556.
[25]Harger, J.R., 1972, Competitive co-existence: maintenance of interacting associations of the sea mussel Mytilus edulis and Mytilus californianus. Veliger 14, 387410.
[26] Holt T.J., Rees E.I., Hawkins S.J., Seed R., 1998, Biogenic Reefs, Vol. 9: An Overview of Dynamic an Sensitivity Characteristics for Conservation Management of Marine SACs. Scottish Association of Marine Sciences/UK Marine SACs Project, Oban, Scotland.
[27]Holway, D.A., 1999, Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80, 238251.
[28]Johnson, A.S., 2001, Drag, drafting, and mechanical interactions in canopies of the red alga Chondrus crispus. Biol. Bull. Mar. Biol. Lab. 201, 126135.
[29]Kennedy, V.S., 2011, Biology of the uncommon dreissenid bivalve Mytilopsis leucophaeata (Conrand, 1831) in central Chesapeake Bay. J. Mollusc. Stud. 77, 154164.
[30]Kohama, T., Montani, S., Kajiwara, Y., Yamada, M., 2001, Population dynamics of sessile bivalves Mytilus galloprovincialis and Xenostrobus securis in hyper eutrophicated bay, Japan. Bull. Jpn Soc. Fish Sci. 67, 664671.
[31] Kimura T., 1994, The population dynamics of Musculista senhousia (Benson) and Limnoperna fortunei kikuchii Habe in Lake Hamana, especially the ecological study of larval recruitment. Ph.D. thesis, Mie University, Mie, Japan.
[32]Kimura, T., Kakuta, T., Kurokura, H., 1995, Salinity tolerance and osmoregulation in freshwater and brackish water mytilids (Mytilidae: genus Limnoperna). Bull. Soc. Sea Water Scientist. Jpn 49, 148152.
[33]Kimura, T., Masaaki, T., Yasuhiro, S., 1999, Limnoperna fortunei kikuchii Habe, 1981 (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) is a synonym of Xenostrobus securis (Lamarck, 1918): introduction into Japan from Australia and/or New Zealand. Jpn J. Malacol. 58, 101117.
[34] Labarta U., Fernández-Reiriz M.J., Pérez-Camacho A., Pérez Corbacho E., 2004, Bateeiros, mar, mejillón. Una perspectiva bioeconómica. CIEF. Fundación Caixagalicia, Santiago de Compostela, ISBN 84-95491-69-9.
[35]Lazzari, G., Rinaldi, E., 1994, Alcune considerazione sulla presenza di specie extra Mediterranee nelle lagune salmastre di Ravenna. Bull. Malacol. 30, 195202.
[36]Lekang, O.-I., Stevik, T.K., Borno, A.M., 2003, Evaluation of different combined collectors used in longlines for blue mussel farming. Aquac. Eng. 27, 89104.
[37]Martella, T., 1974, Some factors influencing byssus thread production in Mytilus edulis (Mollusca: Bivalvia) Linnaeus, 1758. Water Air Soil Pollut. 3, 171177.
[38]Meadows, P.S., Shand, P., 1989, Experimental analysis of byssus thread production by Mytilus edulis and Modiolus modiolus in sediments. Mar. Biol. 101, 219226.
[39]Míguez, B.M., Farina-Busto, L., Figueiras, F.G., Pérez, F.F., 2001, Succession of phytoplankton assemblages in relation to estuarine hydrodynamics in the Ría de Vigo: a box model approach. Sci. Mar. 65, 6576.
[40]Nicastro, K.R., Zardi, G.I., Mcquaid, C.D., 2008, Movement behaviour and mortality in invasive and indigenous mussels: resilience and resistance strategies at different spatial scales. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 372, 119126.
[41] Nicastro K.R., Zardi G.I., Mcquaid C.D., 2010, Differential reproductive investment, attachment strength and mortality of invasive and indigenous mussels across heterogeneous environments. Biol. Invasions, 12, 2165–2177.
[42]Paini, D.R., Funderburk, J.E., Reitz, S.R., 2008, Competitive exclusion of a worldwide invasive pest by a native. Quantifying competition between two phytophagous insects on two host plant species. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 184190.
[43]Pascual, S., Villalba, A., Abollo, E., Garci, M., González, A.F., Nombela, M., Posada, D., Guerra, A., 2010, The mussel Xenostrobus securis: a well-established alien invader in the Ria de Vigo (Spain, NE Atlantic). Biol. Invasions 12, 20912103.
[44]Pearce, T., LaBarbera, M., 2009, Biomechanics of byssal threads outside the Mytilidae: Atrina rigida and Ctenoides mitis. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 14491454.
[45]Petersen, J.K., Nielsen, T.G., van Duren, L., Maar, M., 2008, Depletion of plankton in a raft culture of Mytilus galloprovincialis in Ría de Vigo, NW Spain. I. Phytoplankton. Aquat. Biol. 4, 113125.
[46]Price, H.A., 1982, An analysis of factors determining seasonal variation in the byssal attachment strength of Mytilus edulis L. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 62, 147155.
[47]Price, H.A., 1983, Structure and formation of the byssus complex in Mytilus (Mollusca, Bivalvia). J. Mollusc. Stud. 49, 917.
[48]Rius, M., McQuaid, C.D., 2006, Wave action and competitive interaction between the invasive mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis and the indigenous Perna perna in South Africa. Mar. Biol. 150, 6978.
[49]Sabelli, B., Speranza, S., 1994, Rinvenimento di Xenostrobus sp. (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) nella laguna di Venecia. Bull. Malacol. 29, 311318.
[50]Safriel, U.N., Sasson-Frostig, Z., 1988, Can colonizing mussel outcompete indigenous mussel? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 117, 211226.
[51]Santaclara, F.J., Espiñeira, M., Vieites, J.M., 2007, Molecular Detection of Xenostrobus securis and Mytillus galloprovincialis Larvae in Galician Coast (Spain). Mar. Biotechnol. 9, 722732.
[52]Sará, G., Romano, C., Widdows, J., Staff, F.J., 2008, Effect of salinity and temperature on feeding physiology and scope for growth of an invasive species (Brachidontes pharaonis – Mollusca: Bivalvia) within the Mediterranean sea. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 363, 130136.
[53]Stanley, S.M., 1972, Functional morphology and evolution of byssally attached bivalve molluscs. J. Paleontol. 46, 165212.
[54]Steffani, C.N., Branch, G.M., 2005, Mechanisms and consequences of competition between an alien mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis, and an indigenous limpet, Scutellastra argenvillei. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 317, 127142.
[55]Suchanek, T.H., 1978, The ecology of Mytilus edulis L. in exposed rocky inertial communities. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 31, 105120.
[56]Udhayakumar, M., Karande, A.A., 1989, Byssal threads of Mytilopsis sallei (Recluz) and their adhesive strength. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.) 98, 6576.
[57] Van Erkom Schurink, C., Griffiths, C.L., 1990, Marine mussels of Southern Africa-their distribution patterns, standing stocks, exploitation and culture. J. Shellfish Res. 9, 7585.
[58] Van Winkle, W., 1970, Effect of environmental factors on byssal thread formation. Mar. Biol. 7, 143148.
[59]Vogel, S., 1984, Drag and flexibility in sessile organisms. Am. Zool. 24, 3744.
[60] Vogel S., 1994, Life in moving fluids, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
[61]Waite, J.H., 2002, Adhésion à la moule. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 11721180.
[62]Waite, J.H., Vaccaro, E., Sun, C., Lucas, J.M., 2002, Elastomeric gradients: a hedge against stress concentration in marine holdfasts? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 357, 143153.
[63]Walter, U., Liebezeit, G., 2003, Efficiency of blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) spat collectors in highly dynamic tidal environments of the Lower Saxonian coast (southern North Sea). Biomol. Eng. 20, 407411.
[64]Widdows, J., Bayne, B.L., 1971, Temperature acclimation of Mytilus edulis with reference to its energy budget. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 51, 827843.
[65]Wilson, B., 1968, Survival and reproduction of the mussel Xenostrobus securis (Lam.) (Mollusca-Bivalvia-Mytilidae) in a Western Australian estuary. I. Salinity tolerance. J. Nat. Hist. 2, 307328.
[66]Yamamoto, H., 1995, Marine adhesive proteins and some biotechnological applications. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. 13, 133165.
[67]Yonge, C.M., 1962, On the primitive significance of the byssus in the Bivalvia and its effects in evolution. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 42, 113125.
[68]Young, G.A., 1985, Byssus-thread formation by the mussel Mytilus edulis: effects of environmental factors. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 24, 261271.
[69]Zardi, G.I., Nicastro, K.R., Mc Quaid, C.D., Rius, M., Porri, F., 2006, Hydrodynamic stress and habitat partitioning between indigenous (Perna perna) and invasive (Mytilus galloprovincialis) mussels: constraints of an evolutionary strategy. Mar. Biol. 150, 7988.
[70]Zardi, G.I., McQuaid, C.D., Nicastro, K.R., 2007, Balancing survival and reproduction: seasonality of wave action, attachment strength and reproductive output in indigenous Perna perna and invasive Mytilus galloprovincialis mussels. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 334, 155163.
[71]Zardi, G.I., Nicastro, K.R., Mc Quaid, C.D., Erlandsson, J., 2008, Sand and wave induced mortality in invasive (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and indigenous (Perna perna) mussels. Mar. Biol. 153, 853858.

Keywords

Ecophysiological responses of invasive and indigenous mytilids in the Ría de Vigo (NW Spain)

  • Jose M.F. Babarro (a1) and Malwenn Lassudrie (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed