Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:58:20.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2010

RIKKE L. BUNDGAARD-NIELSEN ,
CATHERINE T. BEST  and
MICHAEL D. TYLER
RIKKE L. BUNDGAARD-NIELSEN*
Affiliation:
University of Western Sydney
CATHERINE T. BEST
Affiliation:
University of Western Sydney and Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT
MICHAEL D. TYLER
Affiliation:
University of Western Sydney
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Rikke L. Bundgaard-Nielsen, MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 1797, Australia. E-mail: r.bundgaardnielsen@uws.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adult second-language (L2) learners’ perception of L2 phonetic segments is influenced by first-language phonological and phonetic properties. It was recently proposed that L2 vocabulary size in adult learners is related to changes in L2 perception (perceptual assimilation model), analogous to the emergence of first-language phonological function (i.e., attunement to the phonological identity of words) associated with the “vocabulary explosion” at 18 months. In a preliminary investigation of the relationship between L2 perception and vocabulary size, Japanese learners of Australian English identified Australian English vowels, provided goodness of fit ratings, and completed a vocabulary size questionnaire. We adopted a “whole-system” approach, allowing learners to apply all native vowel system possibilities to the full L2 vowel system. Learners with a larger L2 vocabulary were more consistent in their vowel assimilation patterns, compatible with the L2 perceptual assimilation model.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 51 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In Goodman, J. C. & Nusbaum, H. (Eds.), in The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct-realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., Faber, A., & Levitt, A. (1996). Perceptual assimilation of non-native vowel contrasts to the American English Vowel System. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Indianapolis, IN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of language-specific phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Munro, J. & Bohn, O.-S. (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., Gooding, T., Orlando, C., & Quann, C. (2009). Toddlers’ spoken word familiarity preferences in native versus nonnative dialects. Psychological Science, 20, 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2008). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.0.27) [Computer program]. Retrieved June 28, 2008, from http://www.praat.org/Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. (1995). What determines the perceptual difficulty encountered in the acquisition of nonnative contrasts? Paper presented at the 13th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L. (2009). Second language speech learning with diverse input. In Young-Scholten, M. & Piske, T. (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 207–218). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1992). The production of new and similar vowels by adult German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebrian, J. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, F. (2006). The acoustic characteristics of /hVd/ vowels in the speech of some Australian teenagers. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 26, 147–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning—Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In Burmeister, P., Piske, T., & Rohde, A. (Eds.), An integrated view of language development—Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 217–244). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 26, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Effects of age of second language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication, 16, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults oft the sounds “L” and “R.” Neuropsychologia, 9, 317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfried, T. L., & Beddor, P. S. (1988). Perception of temporal and spectral information in French vowels. Language and Speech, 31, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goudbeek, M., Cutler, A., & Smits, R. (2008). Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensionally varying nonnative speech categories. Speech Communication, 50, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711–2724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Phonetics Association, . (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge, MA: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, J. C. L., & Park, S.-G. (1997). Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P., & Evans, G. E. (2007). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: Perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 2842–2854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., & Polka, L. (1995). Not everyone can tell a “rock” from a “lock”: Assessing individual differences in speech perception. In Lubinski, D. J. & Dawis, R. V. (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 297–325). Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.Google Scholar
Krebs-Lazendic, L., & Best, C. T. (2008). Early and late bilinguals’ vowel perception and production: English vowel contrasts that give Serbian–English bilinguals a H(E)AD-ache. In Rauber, A. S., Watkins, M. A., & Baptista, B. O. (Eds.), New sounds 2007: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. Florianópolis, Brazil: Federal University of Santa Catarina.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, R., Flege, J. E., & Piske, T. (2002). The influence of the L1 on the acquisition of Swedish vowel quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metsala, J. L. (1999). Young children's phonological awareness and nonword repetition as a function of vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metsala, K. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. S. (2002). Japanese listeners’ use of duration cues in the identification of English high front vowels. In Larson, J. & Paster, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 189–200). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Munro, M., Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. (1996). The effect of age of second language learning on the production of English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, P. (1993). Measuring readiness for simplified reasding: A test of the first 1000 words of English. RELC Journal, 31, 193–203.Google Scholar
Nation, P., & Beglar, D. A. (2007). A vocabulary size test, JALT2007. Retrieved April 1, 2008, from http://jalt-publications.org/tlt/resources/2007/0707a.pdfGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. L., McGregor, K. K., & Demille, D. (2006). Phonological development in lexically precocious 2-year-olds. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strange, W. (1998a). Perception of vowels: Dynamic constancy. In Pickett, J. M. (Ed.), The acoustics of speech communication: Fundamentals, speech perception theory, and technology (pp. 152–165). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Strange, W. (1998b). Perception of consonants: From variance to invariance. In Pickett, J. M. (Ed.), The acoustics of speech communication: Fundamentals, speech perception theory, and technology (pp. 166–182). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., Trent, S. A., Nishi, K., & Jenkins, J. J. (1998). Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 311–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., Weber, A., Levy, E. S., Shafiro, V., Hisagi, M., & Nishi, K. (2007). Acoustic variability within and across German, French and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 1111–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. (2003). Phonetic detail in the developing lexicon. Language and Speech, 46, 265–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsao, F.-M., Liu, H.-M., & Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 75, 1067–1084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsujimura, N. (1996). An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Flege, J. E. (2005). A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1866–1878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed