Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Toward a model of multiple paths to language learning: Response to commentaries

  • LARA J. PIERCE (a1), FRED GENESEE (a2), AUDREY DELCENSERIE (a3) and GARY MORGAN (a4)
  • In response to commentaries on:

Extract

Language learning, while seemingly effortless for young learners, is a complex process involving many interacting pieces, both within the child and in their language-learning environments, which can result in unique language learning trajectories and outcomes. How does the brain adjust to or accommodate the myriad variations that occur during this developmental process. How does it adapt and change over time? In our review, we proposed that the timing, quantity, and quality of children's early language experiences, particularly during an early sensitive period for the acquisition of phonology, shape the establishment of neural phonological representations that are used to establish and support phonological working memory (PWM). The efficiency of the PWM system in turn, we argued, influences the acquisition and processing of more complex aspects of language. In brief, we proposed that experience modulates later language outcomes through its early effects on PWM. We supported this claim by reviewing research from several unique groups of language learners who experience delayed exposure to language (children with cochlear implants [CI] or internationally adopted [IA] children, and children with either impoverished [signing deaf children with hearing parents)] or enriched [bilingual] early language experiences). By comparing PWM and language outcomes in these groups, we sought to highlight general patterns in language development that emerge based on variation in early language exposure. Moving forward, we also proposed that the language acquisition patterns in these groups, and others, can be used to understand how variability in early language input might affect the neural systems supporting language development and how this might affect language learning itself.

Copyright

Corresponding author

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Lara J. Pierce, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 1 Autumn Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: lara.pierce@childrens.harvard.edu or lara.pierce@mcgill.ca

References

Hide All
Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. (2007). Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 242275.
Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2012). Statistical learning from acquiring specific items to forming general rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 170176.
Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2014). Distributional language learning: Mechanisms and models of category formation. Language Learning, 64, 86105.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 129.
Bialystok, E. (2017). The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 233.
Coady, J. A., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Young children's sensitivity to probabilistic phonotactics in the developing lexicon. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 183213.
Delcenserie, A., & Genesee, F. (2016). The effects of age of acquisition and bilingualism on verbal working memory. International Journal of Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:1177/1367006916639158
Eichenbaum, H., & Cohen, N. J. (2004). From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain (No. 35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16, 234248.
Fisher, S. E., & DeFries, J. C. (2002). Developmental dyslexia: Genetic dissection of a complex cognitive trait. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 767780.
Fox, K., & Wong, R. O. (2005). A comparison of experience-dependent plasticity in the visual and somatosensory systems. Neuron, 48, 465477.
French, L. M., & O'Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children's second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 463487. doi:10.1017/S0142716408080211
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513543.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Hoff, E. (2003). Causes and consequences of SES-related differences in parent-to-child speech. In Bornstein, M. & Bradley, R. H. (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Keren-Portnoy, T., Vihman, M. M., DePaolis, R. A., Whitaker, C. J., & Williams, N. M. (2010). The role of vocal practice in constructing phonological working memory. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 12801293.
MacDermot, K. D., Bonora, E., Sykes, N., Coupe, A. M., Lai, C. S., Vernes, S. C., . . . Fisher, S. E. (2005). Identification of FOXP2 truncation as a novel cause of developmental speech and language deficits. American Journal of Human Genetics, 76, 10741080.
MacKenzie, H., Curtin, S., & Graham, S. A. (2012). 12 month-olds’ phonotactic knowledge guides their word-object mappings. Child Development, 83, 11291136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01764.x
Maye, J., Weiss, D. J., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Statistical phonetic learning in infants: Facilitation and feature generalization. Developmental Science, 11, 122134.
Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101B111.
Messer, M. H., Leseman, P. P. M., Boom, J., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 306323.
Morton, J. B., & Harper, S. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10, 719726.
Parra, M., Hoff, E., & Core, C. (2010). Relations among language exposure, phonological memory, and language development in Spanish-English bilingually developing 2-year olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 113125.
Pierce, L. J., Genesee, F., & Klein, D. (2016). Language loss or retention in internationally-adopted children: Neurocognitive implications for language learning. In Genesee, F. & Delcenserie, A. (Eds.), Starting over—The language development of internationally-adopted children (pp. 179202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rowe, M. L. (2008). Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35, 185205.
Shibata, K., Sasaki, Y., Bang, J. W., Walsh, E. G., Machizawa, M. G., Tamaki, M., . . . Watanabe, T. (2017). Overlearning hyperstabilizes a skill by rapidly making neurochemical processing inhibitory-dominant. Nature Neuroscience, 20, 470475.
Smith, N. V., & Tsimpli, I. M. (1995). The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, N., Tsimpli, I. M., Morgan, G., & Woll, B. (2010). Signs of the savant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thorn, A. S. C., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 303324.
Werker, J. F., & Hensch, T. K. (2015). Critical periods in speech perception: New directions. Psychology, 66, 173.
Werker, J. F., Yeung, H. H., & Yoshida, K. A. (2012). How do infants become experts at native-speech perception? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 221226.
Yoshida, K. A., Pons, F., Maye, J., & Werker, J. F. (2010). Distributional phonetic learning at 10 months of age. Infancy, 15, 420433.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Toward a model of multiple paths to language learning: Response to commentaries

  • LARA J. PIERCE (a1), FRED GENESEE (a2), AUDREY DELCENSERIE (a3) and GARY MORGAN (a4)
  • In response to commentaries on:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.