Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T14:38:32.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sound change: A phonemic split in a misarticulating child

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Judith A. Gierut
Judith A. Gierut*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
*
Judith A. Gierut, Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to report a clinically induced phonemic split (i.e., the restructuring of allophones as distinct phonemes) by presenting longitudinal data from a functionally misarticulating child. For this child, three qualitatively and quantitatively distinct stages were observed relative to the acquisition of the phonemic split: 1. complementary distribution (allophones of the same phoneme); 2. position-specific free variation (intermediate to a phonemic split); and 3. phonemic distinction for some, but not all morphemes (phonemic split).

The results of this clinical case study, documenting the nature and development of a phonemic split, have implications for related phenomena in normal language acquisition, second-language learning, and sound change in primary languages.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1986 , pp. 57 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Camarata, S., & Gandour, J. (1984). On describing idiosyncratic phonologic systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 262–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, M., & Wang, W. (1975). Sound change: Actuation and implementation. Language, 51, 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, L. J. (1975). The learner's interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, W. B. (1980). The psycholinguistic unity of language learning and language change. Language Learning, 26, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1980). Linguistic approaches to sampling and analysis of misarticulated speech. Paper presented at a mini-seminar of the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Detroit.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1981). Phonology and functional misarticulation. Paper presented at the Conference on Dimensions in Communicative Disorders, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1984). Methods and empirical issues in analyzing functional misarticulation. In Elbert, M., Dinnsen, D. A., & Weismer, G. (Eds.), Phonological theory and the misarticulating child (ASHA Monographs No. 22, pp. 5–17). Rockville, Md.: ASHA.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A., & Elbert, M. (1984). On the relationship between phonology and learning. In Elbert, M., Dinnsen, D. A., & Weismer, G. (Eds.), Phonological theory and the misarticulating child (ASHA Monographs No. 22, pp. 59–68). Rockville, Md.: ASHA.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A., Elbert, M., & Weismer, G. (1979). On the characterization of functional misarticulation. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A., (1980). Some typological properties of functional misarticulation systems. In Dressler, W. O. (Ed.), Phonologica 1980, Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beitrage zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Elbert, M., Dinnsen, D. A., & Powell, T. (1984). On the prediction of phonologic generalization learning patterns. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbert, M., & McReynolds, L. (1975). Transfer of /r/ across contexts. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 380–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbert, M., (1978). An experimental analysis of misarticulating children's generalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 136–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbert, M., Shelton, R., & Arndt, W. (1967). A task for evaluation of articulation change: I. Development of methodology. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierut, J. A. (1985a). Generative phonology: Clinical applications in speech pathology. Innovations in Linguistic Education, 3, 152–167.Google Scholar
Gierut, J. A. (1985b). On the relationship between phonological knowledge and generalization learning in misarticulating children. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington. (Also available from the Indiana University Linguistics Club.)Google Scholar
Janson, T. (1983). Sound change in perception and production. Language, 59, 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, T., & Shulman, R. (1983). Non-distinctive features and their use. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1981). Resolving the neogrammarian controversy. Language, 57, 267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, Mich.: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Newhoff, M., & Mesalam, L. (1980). Individual differences in early child phonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macken, M. (1979). The child's lexical representation: The “puzzle-puddle-pickle” evidence. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 16, 26–41.Google Scholar
Macken, M., & Ferguson, C. (1982). Cognitive aspects of phonological development: Model, evidence and issues. To appear in Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Children's language. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, E. (1979). Competing analyses of a deviant phonology. Glossa, 13, 181–213.Google Scholar
Maxwell, E. (1981). A study of misarticulation from a linguistic perspective. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington. (Also available from the Indiana University Linguistics Club.)Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1979). Transition and variation in child phonology: Modeling a developing system. In Fischer-Jorgensen, E., Rischel, J., & Thorsen, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Copenhagen: Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Mowrer, D. (1971). Transfer of training in articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 36, 427–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, J., & McReynolds, L. (1969). A procedure for testing position generalization from articulation training. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 629–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelton, R., Elbert, M., & Arndt, W. (1967). A task for evaluation of articulation changes: II. Comparison of task scores during baseline and lesson series listing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 10, 578–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W. (1969). Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language, 45, 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar