Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T17:08:21.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning disabled children's conversational competence: An attempt to activate the inactive listener

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Mavis L. Donahue
Mavis L. Donahue*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
*
Mavis L. Donahue, College of Education, University of Illinois at Chicago, Box 4348, Chicago, IL 60680
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Learning disabled children have been found to be less likely than nondisabled children to request clarification of ambiguous messages provided by adults. This study tested a strategy deficit hypothesis as one source of this conversational deficit by assessing the effects of a brief intervention which highlighted the appropriate response strategy, i.e., question-asking. Learning disabled and non-disabled children in grades four, five, and six played the listener role in a referential communication task requiring them to select referents based on messages varying in informational adequacy. Although group and grade differences replicated previous findings, the intervention condition had no effect on the children's performance on a posttest. An analysis of referent selections indicated that the inactive listeners were overrelying on the Maxim of Quantity, the Gricean principle that cooperative speakers provide informative messages. These results suggest that conversational development depends on children's increasing ability to recognize contexts in which these conversational principles do not apply.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 21 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, B.Speaker bias in children's evaluation of the external consistency of statements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1983, 35, 111–127.Google Scholar
Bryan, T., Donahue, M., & Pearl, R.Learning disabled children's peer interactions during a small group problem solving task. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981, 4, 13–22.Google Scholar
Bryan, T., Donahue, M., Pearl, R., & Sturm, C.Learning disabled children's conversational skills: The TV Talk Show. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981, 4, 250–259.Google Scholar
Cazden, C., John, V., & Hymes, D.Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Columbia University Teacher's College Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. W., & Boersma, F. J.Learning disabilities, locus of control, and mother attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979, 71, 250–258.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A., Jennings, K., Jennings, S., Leiter, K., Mackay, R., Mehan, H., & Roth, D.Language use and school performance. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, J., & Patterson, C.Plans and the development of listener skills. Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13, 557–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, J., & Patterson, C.Generalization of training for children's listener skills. Child Development, 1978, 49, 513–516.Google Scholar
Donahue, M.Requesting strategies of learning disabled children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1981, 2, 213–234.Google Scholar
Donahue, M., & Bryan, T.Conversational skills and modeling in learning disabled boys. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1983, 4, 251–278.Google Scholar
Donahue, M., Pearl, R., & Bryan, T.Learning disabled children's conversational competence: Responses to inadequate messages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1980, 1, 387–403.Google Scholar
Donahue, M., & Prescott, B. Young learning disabled children's conversational participation in dispute episodes with peers. Chicago Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, 1983.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M.Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, 1965.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. Timing and context in everyday discourse: Implications for the study of referential and social meaning. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press, 1981. Pp. 241–269.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. The contingent query: A dependent act in conversation. In Lewis, M. and Rosenblum, L. (Eds.), Interaction, conversation and the development of language. New York: John Wiley, 1977. Pp. 63–93.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts. New York: Seminar Press, 1975. Pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Horton, R. L.The general linear model: Data analysis in the social and behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hall, 1978.Google Scholar
Ironsmith, M., & Whitehurst, G.The development of listener skills in communication: How children deal with ambiguous information. Child Development, 1978a, 49, 348–352.Google Scholar
Ironsmith, M., & Whitehurst, G.How children learn to listen: The effects of modeling feedback styles on children's performance in referential communication. Developmental Psychology, 1978b, 14, 546–554.Google Scholar
Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S.Ambiguity and implicature in children's discourse comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 1982, 9, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. Side sequences. In Sudnow, D. (Ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press, 1972. Pp. 294–338.Google Scholar
Keenan, E., & Schieffelin, B. Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In Li, C. (Ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, 1976. Pp. 335–384.Google Scholar
Mosher, F., & Hornsby, I. On asking questions. In Bruner, J., Oliver, R., and Greenfield, P. (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley, 1966. Pp. 86–102.Google Scholar
Naslund, R., Thorpe, L., & Lefever, D.SRA Achievement Series Test. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1978.Google Scholar
Nielson, I., & Dockrell, J. Cognitive tasks as interactional settings. In Butterworth, G. & Light, P. (Eds.), Social cognition: Studies of the development of understanding Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982. Pp. 213–237.Google Scholar
Patterson, C., Massad, C., & Cosgrove, J.Children's referential communication: Components of plans for effective listening. Developmental Psychology, 1978, 14, 401–406.Google Scholar
Patterson, C., O'Brien, C., Kister, M., Carter, B., & Kotsonis, M.Development of comprehension monitoring as a function of context. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, R., Bryan, T., & Donahue, M.Learning disabled children's attributions for success and failure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980, 3, 3–9.Google Scholar
Robinson, E., & Robinson, W.The young child's understanding of communication. Developmental Psychology, 1976a, 12, 328–333.Google Scholar
Robinson, E., & Robinson, W.Developmental changes in the child's explanations of communication failure. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1976b, 25, 155–165.Google Scholar
Robinson, E., & Robinson, W.Development in the understanding of causes of success and failure in verbal communication. Cognition, 1977, 5, 363–378.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R.Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Sonnenschein, S. Why young listeners do not benefit from differentiating verbal redundancy. Child Development, in press.Google Scholar
Sonnenschein, S., & Whitehurst, G.The development of communication: When a bad model makes a good teacher. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1980, 3, 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spekman, N. J.Dyadic verbal communication abilities of learning disabled and normally achieving fourth and fifth-grade boys. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981, 4, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgesen, J.The role of nonspecific factors in the task performance of learning disabled children: A theoretical assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977, 10, 27–34.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J.Conceptual and educational implication of the use of efficient task strategies by learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13, 364–371.Google Scholar
U.S. Office of Education. Assistance to states for education of handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 1977, 42, 65082–65085.Google Scholar
Whitehurst, G. & Sonnenschein, S. The development of informative messages in referential communication: Knowing when vs. knowing how. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Wiig, E., & Semel, E.Language disabilities in children and adolescents. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1976.Google Scholar
Wiig, E., & Semel, E.Language assessment and intervention for the learning disabled. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1980.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R., & Johnson, M.Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Boston, Ma.: Teaching Resources Corporation, 1977.Google Scholar