Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The effects of training on automatization of word recognition in English as a foreign language

  • NOBUHIKO AKAMATSU (a1)

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of word-recognition training on the word-recognition processing of learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). Providing 7-week word-recognition training, the study examined whether such training improves EFL learners' word-recognition performance. The main aspects of this study concerned word frequency and working-memory capacity in automatization of word recognition. Analysis of variance and correlational analyses revealed qualitative differences in the improvement of EFL word-recognition performance with respect to word frequency. The improvement in the processing of high-frequency words was associated with simple speedup; conversely, the processing of low-frequency words was associated with automatization. Results also showed that working-memory capacity might not play a noticeable role in improving word-recognition speed or efficiency.

Copyright

Corresponding author

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Nobuhiko Akamatsu, Department of English, Doshisha University, Imadegawa-Karasuma, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8580, Japan. E-mail: nakamats@mail.doshisha.ac.jp

References

Hide All
Ackerman, P. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 327.
Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Akamatsu, N. (1999). The effects of first language orthographic features on word-recognition processing in English as a second language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 381403.
Akamatsu, N. (2002). A similarity in word-recognition procedure among L2 readers with different L1 backgrounds. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 117133.
Akamatsu, N. (2003). The effects of first-language orthographic features on second-language reading in text. Language Learning, 53, 207231.
Akamatsu, N. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Japanese–English bilinguals. In Joshi, R. M. & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 481496). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 644652.
Brown, T., & Haynes, M. (1985). Literacy background and reading development in a second language. In Carr, H. (Ed.), The development of reading skills (pp. 1934). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
Carpenter, P., Miyake, A., & Just, M. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 10751122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450466.
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422433.
DeKeyser, R. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehri, L. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 383417). New York: Longman.
Ehri, L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Gough, P., Ehri, L., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fukkink, R. G., Hulstijn, J., & Simis, A. (2005). Does training in second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension= An experimental study. Modern Language Journal, 89, 5475.
Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A. (1993). Working memory and language. Hove: Erlbaum.
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 2538.
Koda, K. (1988). Cognitive process in second language reading: Transfer of L1 reading skills and strategies. Second Language Research, 4, 133156.
Koda, K. (1990). The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading: Effects of L1 orthographic structures on L2 phonological recoding strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 393410.
Koda, K. (1996). L2 word recognition research: A critical review. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 450460.
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
MacGinitie, W., & MacGinitie, R. (1992). Gates–MacGinitie reading tests (2nd ed.). Toronto: Nelson Canada.
MacLeod, C. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163203.
McCusker, L., Hillinger, M., & Bias, R. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 217245.
McLaughlin, B. (1995). Aptitude from an information-processing perspective. Language Testing, 12, 370387.
Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297326.
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Perfetti, C. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In Gough, P., Ehri, L., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. New York: Cambridge University Press. Please cite Read 2000 in the text.
Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382408). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J. (2005). Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In Kroll, J. F. (Ed.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371388). New York: Oxford University Press.
Segalowitz, N., Poulsen, C., & Segalowitz, S. (1999). RT coefficient variation is differentially sensitive to executive control involvement in an attention switching task. Brain and Cognition, 40, 255258.
Segalowitz, N., & Segalowitz, S. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speedup from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369385.
Segalowitz, N., Watson, V., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1995). Vocabulary skill: Single-case assessment of automaticity of word recognition in a timed lexical decision task. Second Language Research, 11, 121136.
Segalowitz, S., Segalowitz, N., & Wood, A. (1998). Assessing the development of automaticity in second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 5367.
Seidenberg, M. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 130.
Seidenberg, M. (1992). Beyond orthographic depth in reading: Equitable division of labor. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 85118). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Seidenberg, M., Waters, G., Barnes, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition= Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383404.
Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151218.
Stanovich, K. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72100.
Stanovich, K. (1991). Word recognition: Changing perspectives. In Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 418452). New York: Longman.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed