Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Effects of the age of second language learning on the duration of first and second language sentences: The role of suppression

  • IAN R. A. MACKAY (a1) and JAMES E. FLEGE (a2)

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to account for the finding that late bilinguals produce longer English sentences than early bilinguals. In Experiment 1, Italians who immigrated to Canada either between the age of 2–13 years (“early bilinguals”) or 15–28 years (“late bilinguals”) repeated matched English and Italian sentences following an aural model. The early bilinguals produced shorter English than Italian sentences, whereas the late bilinguals showed the opposite pattern. The same countervailing pattern was evident in Experiment 2, where bilinguals shortened sentences by 20% when instructed to repeat sentences as rapidly as possible. Subgroups of bilinguals who reported using Italian often M=46% Italian use) but not seldom (M=8%) were found to have produced significantly longer English sentences than native English (NE) speakers did. The results were interpreted to mean that the late bilinguals produced longer English sentences than the early bilinguals because they needed to expend more resources to suppress their Italian subsystem than the early bilinguals. The perceptual effect of sentence duration was evaluated in Experiment 3, where pairs of English sentences differing in duration were presented to NE-speaking listeners for foreign accent ratings. A 10% shortening caused sentences spoken by late bilinguals to sound less foreign accented but it caused sentences spoken by early bilinguals to sound more foreign accented.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Division of Speech & Hearing Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, CH20, Room 119, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-2042. E-mail: jeflege@uab.edu

References

Hide All
Anderson–Hsieh, & Koehler K. 1988. The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 38, 561614.
Bradlow A., & Bent T. 2002. The clear speech effect for nonnative listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 272284.
Brennan E., & Brennan J. 1981. Measurement of accent and attitude toward Mexican American speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 10 487501.
Cunningham–Andersson U., & Engstrand O. 1989. Perceived strength and identity of foreign accent in Swedish. Phonetica, 46, 138154.
Derwing T., & Munro M. 1997. Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19 116.
Favreau M., & Segalowitz N. 1982. Second language reading in fluent bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics 3 329341.
Favreau M., & Segalowitz N. 1983. Automatic and controlled processes in the first- and second-language reading of fluent bilinguals. Memory and Cognition 11 565574.
Flege J. 1984. The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76 692707.
Flege J., Frieda E., Walley A., & Randazza L. 1998. Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second-language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 155188.
Flege J., MacKay I., & Meador D. 1999. Native Italian speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 29732987.
Flege J., MacKay I., & Piske T. 2002. Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23 567598.
Flege J., & Munro M. 1994. The word unit in L2 speech production and perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16 381411.
Flege J., Munro M., & MacKay I. 1995a. Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 31253134.
Flege J., Munro M., & MacKay I. 1995b. The effect of age of second language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication 16, 126.
Flege J., Takagi N., & Mann V. 1996. Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults' perception of // and /1/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 11611173.
Flege J., Yeni–Komshian G., & Liu S. 1999. constraints on second language. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 78104.
Gaitenby J. 1965. The elastic word. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, 2, 112.
Geffen G., & Luszcz M. 1983. Are the spoken durations of rare words longer than those in common words? Memory & Cognition 11 1315.
Geffen G., Stierman I., & Tildesley P. 1979. The effect of word length and frequency on articulation and pausing during delayed auditory feedback. Language and Speech, 22, 191199.
Green D. 1986. Control, activation, and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210223.
Guion S., Flege J., Liu S., & Yeni–Komshian G. 2000. Age of learning affects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 205228.
Jia G., & Aaronson D. 1999. Age differences in second language acquisition: The dominant language switch and maintenance hypothesis. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 301312), Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Press.
Jonasson J., & McAllister R. 1972. Foreign accent and timing: An instrumental phonetic study. Papers from the Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm 14 1140.
Little R., & Rubin D. 1987. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
Magen H. 1998. The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 381400.
Mägiste E. 1992. Second language learning in elementary and high school students. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 355365.
Major R. 1986 Paragoge and degree of foreign accent in Brazilian English. Second Language Research, 2, 5371.
Meuter R. F. I., & Allport A. 1999. Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language 40 2540.
Miller J., Green K., & Reeves A. 1986. Speaking rate and segments: A look at the relation between speech production and speech perception for the voicing contrast. Phonetica, 43, 106115.
Munro M. 1995. Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 1734.
Munro M. 1998. The effects of noise on the intelligibility of foreign-accented speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 139154.
Munro M., & Derwing T. 2001. Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23 451468.
Munro M., Flege J., & MacKay I. 1996. The effect of age of second-language learning on the production of English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 313334.
Picheny M., Durlach M., & Braida L. 1989. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing: III. An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 600683.
Piske T., Flege J., MacKay I., & Meador D. 2002. The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian–English bilinguals. Phonetica, 59, 4971.
Piske T., MacKay I., & Flege J. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191215.
Riggenbach H. 1991. Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14, 423441.
Schairer K. 1992. Native speaker reaction to non-native speech. Modern Language Journal, 76, 309319.
Soares C., & Grosjean F. 1984. Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 12, 380386.
van Wijngaarden S., Steeneken H., & Houtgast T. 2001. The effect of a non-native accent in Dutch on speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2473(A).
van Wijngaarden S., Steeneken H., & Houtgast T. 2002. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 30043013.
Wright C. 1979. Duration differences between rare and common words and their implication for the interpretation of word frequency effects. Memory & Cognition, 7, 411419.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Effects of the age of second language learning on the duration of first and second language sentences: The role of suppression

  • IAN R. A. MACKAY (a1) and JAMES E. FLEGE (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.