Skip to main content Accessibility help

Effects of prosodic modeling and repeated reading on poor readers' fluency and comprehension

  • Arlene R. Young (a1), Patricia Greig Bowers (a1) and G. E. MacKinnon (a1)


Repeated reading of meaningful text has been shown to produce improvements in reading rate, fluency, and comprehension in readers of varying ability. The assisted repeated reading (ARR) method, which provides a fluent and expressive (i.e., prosodic) model, has been proposed as being particularly helpful in this regard. However, it is unclear which component of the ARR method (prosodic modeling or reading practice with intact text) is the most influential factor. The present study examined the effects of text practice and prosodic modeling on the reading rate, accuracy, expressiveness, and comprehension of 40 grade 5 disabled readers. Text practice and prosodic modeling were systematically varied to create four training conditions. Each subject read the first half of a set of stories three times under one of the four experimental conditions. Pretest and posttest measures of the dependent variables were analyzed for both the training passages and the second half of each story, on which no training occurred (transfer passages). While reading performance improved across all conditions, substantial additional gains were produced by the conditions that included the practice of intact text. Modeling of prosody did not produce significant additional gains. Transfer effects were limited, with only the ARR condition producing improved accuracy on the second half of the stories.


Corresponding author

Arlene Young, Developmental Neuropsychiatry Clinic, Child and Family Studies Centre, Clark Institute of Psychiatry, 250 College St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 1R8


Hide All
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. Reading Teacher, 36, 556561.
Allington, R. L., & Brown, S. (1979). Fact: A multi-media reading program. Milwaukee, WI:Raintree Publishers.
Bowers, P. G. (1993). Text reading and rereading: Predictors of fluency beyond word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 133153.
Carlisle, J. F., & Felbinger, L. (1991). Profiles of listening and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 345354.
Conte, R., & Humphreys, R. (1989). Repeated readings using audiotaped material enhances oral reading in children with reading difficulties. Journal of Communicative Disorders, 22, 6579.
Dahl, P. R. (1979). An experimental program for teaching high-speed word recognition and comprehension skills. In Button, J. E., Lovitt, T. C., & Rowland, T. D. (Eds.), Communications research in learning disabilities and mental retardation (pp. 3365). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 389406.
Downs, J., & Morin, S. (1990). Improving reading fluency with precision teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, Spring, 3840.
Faulkner, H. J., & Levy, B. A. (1994). How text difficulty and reader skill interact to produce differential reliance on word and content overlap in reading transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 124.
Fleisher, L. S., Jenkins, J. R., & Pany, D. (1979). Effects on poor readers' comprehension of training in rapid decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 3048.
Fry, E. (1977). Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242252.
Gambrell, L. B., Koskinen, P. S., & Kapinus, B. A. (1991). Retelling and the reading comprehension of proficient and less-proficient readers. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 356362.
Harris, A. A., & Jacobson, M. D. (1982). Basic reading vocabularies (pp. 1937). New York: Macmillan.
Heckelman, R. G. (1969). A neurological impress method of reading instruction. Academic Therapy, 4, 277282.
Herman, P. A. (1985). The effect of repeated readings on reading rate, speed pauses, and word recognition. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 553565.
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Krug, D., Davis, B., & Glover, J. (1990). Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 366371.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293323.
Lesgold, A. M., & Perfetti, C. A. (1981). Interactive processes in reading: Where do we stand? In Lesgold, A. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 387405). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (1978). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests: Canadian Edition. Toronto: Nelson Publishing.
Mann, V. A., Cowin, E., & Schoenheimer, J. (1989). Phonological processing, language comprehension, and reading ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 7689.
McMahon, M. L. (1983). Development of reading-while-listening skills in the primary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 3852.
O'Shea, L. J., Sindelar, P. T., & O'Shea, D. J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on the reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 129142.
O'Shea, L. J., Sindelar, P. T., & O'Shea, D. J. (1987). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on the reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103109.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1979). Coding comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. In Resnick, L. & Weaver, P. (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 1, pp. 5784). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rasinski, T. V. (1985). The study of factors involved in reader–text interactions that contribute to fluency in reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus.
Rasinski, T. V. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 147150.
Rashotte, C. A., & Torgesen, J. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180189.
Reitsma, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while- listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 219234.
Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. Reading Teacher, 32, 403408.
Schreiber, P. A. (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 177186.
Schreiber, P. A. (1986). On the role of prosody in children's syntactic processing (Program Report 86–11). Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Schreiber, P. A. (1987). Prosody and structure in children's syntactic processing. In Horowitz, R. & Samuels, J. (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 243270). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Spring, C., Blunden, D., & Gatheral, M. (1981). Effect on reading comprehension of training to automaticity in word-reading. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 779786.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360407.
Swalm, J. E. (1972). A comparison of oral reading, silent reading, and listening comprehension. Education, 92, 111115.
Taylor, N. E., Wade, M. R., & Yekovich, F. R. (1985). The effects of text manipulation and multiple reading strategies on the reading performance of good and poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 566574.
Turner, A., & Greene, E. (1978). The construction of a propositional text base. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8, 181.
van, Bon W. H., Boksebeld, L. M., Freide, T. A., & van, den Hurk A. J. (1991). Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 471476.
Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Young, A. R., & Bowers, P. G. (1995). Individual difference and text difficulty determinants of reading fluency and expressiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 428454.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Effects of prosodic modeling and repeated reading on poor readers' fluency and comprehension

  • Arlene R. Young (a1), Patricia Greig Bowers (a1) and G. E. MacKinnon (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.