Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:38:57.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's production of head-final relative clauses: The case of Mandarin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2015

SHENAI HU ,
ANNA GAVARRÓ  and
MARIA TERESA GUASTI
SHENAI HU*
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and University of Milano-Bicocca
ANNA GAVARRÓ
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
MARIA TERESA GUASTI
Affiliation:
University of Milano-Bicocca
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Shenai Hu, Dipartimento di Psicologia, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milan, Italy. E-mail: shenai.hu@unimib.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We explored the acquisition of relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese, a subject–verb–object language with head-final relatives. One hundred and twenty-five children (aged 3 years to 8 years, 11 months) and 20 adults participated in an elicitation task. The results revealed a subject advantage at all ages and a large production of relative clauses with resumptive noun phrases (NPs) across age groups. To further explore the latter finding, we carried out a grammaticality judgment study with 80 adults. We found that relative clauses with resumptive NPs are acceptable in the spoken language for many adult native speakers of Mandarin. This result is at odds with Chinese prescriptive grammar. We propose an analysis of the subject advantage based on the structure intervention expressed as relativized minimality and argue that resumptive NPs are an option in Mandarin relative clauses.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 323 - 346
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adani, F., Shem, M., & Zukowski, A. (2013). How do German children and adults deal with their relatives. In Stavrakaki, S., Konstantinopoulou, X., & Lalioti, M. (Eds.), Advances in language acquisition. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Adani, F., van der Lely, H., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2010). Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian Children. Lingua, 120, 2148–2166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoun, J., & Li, Y.-H. A. (2003). Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnon, I. (2010). Rethinking child difficulty: The effect of NP type on children's processing of relative clauses in Hebrew. Journal of Child Language, 37, 27–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Friedmann, N., Brunato, D., & Rizzi, L. (2012). Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children's comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua, 122, 1053–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2013). Ways of avoiding intervention: Some thoughts on the development of object relatives, passive and control. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M. & Berwick, R. C. (Eds.), Rich languages from poor inputs (pp. 115–126). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Branchini, C., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C., Donati, C., & Geraci, C. (2013). WH-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Sign Language & Linguistics, 16, 157–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A., Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (2011). The acquisition of relative clauses in Cantonese and Mandarin. In Kidd, E. (Ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: Processing, typology and function (pp. 197–225). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., & Shirai, Y. (2014). The acquisition of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language. Advance online publication.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheng, L. L.-S., & Sybesma, R. (2009). De 的 as an underspecified classifier: First exploration. Yuyanxue Luncong [Essays on Linguistics], 39, 123–156.Google Scholar
Cheng, S. Y.-Y. (1995). The acquisition of relative clauses in Chinese. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (2013). Typological studies: Word order and relative clauses. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Contemori, C., & Belletti, A. (2013). Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian-speaking children and adults: Intervention in production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Costa, J., Lobo, M., & Silva, C. (2011). Subject–object asymmetries in the acquisition of Portuguese relative clauses: Adults vs. children. Lingua, 121, 1083–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., McKee, C., & Emiliani, M. (1990). Visiting relatives in Italy. In Frazier, L. & de Villiers, J. (Eds.), Language processing and language acquisition (pp. 335–356). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vincenzi, M. (1991). Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian: The minimal chain principle. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2000). The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (2013a). Order of relative clause and noun. In Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M. (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from http://wals.info/chapter/90Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. (2013b). Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of relative clause and noun. In Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M. (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from http://wals.info/chapter/96Google Scholar
Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Rizzi, L. (2006). Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition, 101, 173–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frazier, L., & Flores d’Arcais, G. B. (1989). Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavarró, A., Cunill, A., Muntané, M., & Reguant, M. (2012). The acquisition of Catalan relatives: Structure and processing. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique—Romanian Review of Linguistics, 57, 183–201.Google Scholar
Goodluck, H. (2010). Object extraction is not subject to child relativized minimality. Lingua, 120, 1516–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, G. (2001). A study of resumptive pronouns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T., & Cardinaletti, A. (2003). Relative clause formation in Romance child's production. Probus, 15, 47–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Stavrakaki, S., & Arosio, F. (2012). Cross-linguistic differences and similarities in the acquisition of relative clauses: Evidence from Greek and Italian. Lingua, 122, 700–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamburger, H., & Crain, S. (1982). Relative acquisition. In Kuczaj, S. (Ed.), Language development: Syntax and semantics (pp. 245–274). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C., & Wexler, K. (2006). Children's passives and their resulting interpretation. In Deen, K. U., Nomura, J., Schulz, B., & Schwartz, B. D. (Eds.), The proceedings of the inaugural conference on generative approaches to language acquisition—North America (University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 4, pp. 125–136). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Hofmeister, P., Casasanto, L. S., & Sag, I. A. (2014). Processing effects in linguistic judgment data: (Super-)additivity and reading span scores. Language and Cognition, 6, 111–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, C.-C. N., Hermon, G., & Zukowski, A. (2009). Young children's production of head-final relative clauses: Elicited production data from Chinese children. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 18, 323–360.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Labelle, M. (1990). Predication, wh-movement, and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 1, 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labelle, M. (1996). The acquisition of relative clauses: Movement or no movement? Language Acquisition, 5, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, C., & McDaniel, D. (2001). Resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 9, 113–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ning, L.-H. (2008). The grammar and processing of resumptive pronouns in Chinese relative clauses. Unpublished master's thesis, National Chengchi University.Google Scholar
Novogrodsky, R., & Friedmann, N. (2006). The production of relative clauses in syntactic SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech–Language Pathology, 8, 364–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozeki, H., & Shirai, Y. (2007). The consequences of variation in the acquisition of relative clauses: An analysis of longitudinal production data from five Japanese children. In Matsumoto, Y., Oshima, D. Y., Robinson, O. W., & Sells, P. (Eds.), Diversity in language: Perspectives and implications (pp. 243–270). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T. (1995). Resumptives in the acquisition of relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 4, 105–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2004). Locality and left periphery. In Belletti, A. (Ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 3, pp. 223–251). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Y.-C. (2004). Relatives of Mandarin children. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition in North America Conference, University of Hawai’i, Manoa.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. (1996). Elicited production. In McDaniel, D., McKee, C., & Cairns, H. (Eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax (pp. 77–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zukowski, A. (2009). Elicited production of relatives clauses in children with Williams syndrome. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar