Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:03:58.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Heinz Wimmer
Heinz Wimmer*
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg.
*
University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria, wimmer@edvz.sbg.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study assessed reading difficulties and cognitive impairments of German-speaking dyslexic children at grade levels 2, 3, and 4. It was found that German dyslexic children suffered from a pervasive speed deficit for all types of reading tasks, including text, high frequency words, and pseudowords, but at the same time showed generally rather high reading accuracy. For pseudowords, reading refusals or word responses were absent, and the majority of errors was close to the target pronunciation. Reading speed seemed to be most impaired for pseudowords and function words that did not allow the children to take a short-cut from phonemically mediated word processing. The discussion offers a developmental framework for the interpretation of these reading difficulties. For the cognitive tasks, dyslexic children did not differ from age-matched control children on the pseudoword repetition task or the digit span task, indicating that auditory perception and memory were not impaired. On phonological awareness tasks (rhyme oddity detection, vowel substitution, and pseudoword spelling), dyslexic children scored lower than age-matched control children, but not lower than younger reading-level control children. The performance of the dyslexic children on the phonemic segmentation tasks (pseudoword spelling and vowel substitution) was high in absolute terms. In contrast, marked differences between dyslexic and age-matched controls were found on rapid naming tasks: dyslexic grade 4 children showed lower numeral-naming speed than reading-level grade 2 children. Numeral-naming speed turned out to be the most important predictor of reading speed differences. These findings are discussed in relation to the phonological impairment explanation of dyslexia and to recent alternative explanations that posit an underlying impairment in automatizing skills which demand the fast execution of low-level cognitive processes.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 1 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baddely, A. D., Logie, R. H., & Ellis, N. C. (1988). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 29, 127–228.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1985). Spelling ability in congenital dysarthria: Evidence against articulatory coding in translating between phonemes and graphemes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, P. G. (1989). Naming speed and phonological awareness: Independent contributorsto reading disabilities. In McCormick, S. and Zutell, J. (Eds.), Cognitive and socialperspectives for literacy research and instruction: 38th Yearbook of the National Reading ConferenceChicago:National Reading Conference. (pp. 165–172).Google Scholar
Bowers, P. G., & Swanson, L. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiplemeasures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, P. G. & Wolf, M. (1992). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timingmechanisms, and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause ofreading backwardness. Nature 271, 746–747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruck, M. (1990a). Persistence of dyslexic children's phonological awareness deficits. Unpublished manuscript, McGill-Montreal Children's Hospital Learning Center.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1990b). Word recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439–454.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. & Treiman, R. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal childrenand dyslexic children: The case of initial consonant clusters. Journal of ExperimentalChild Psychology, 50, 156–178.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E. & Bradley, L. (1985). Children's reading problems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration,phoneme detection and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, S. E. & Werker, J. F. (1989). Toward understanding the problems in severely disabledreaders: Part I. Vowel errors. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R. L. (1982). Individual differences in short-term memory. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 11, 3–77.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In Underwood, G. (Ed.), Strategies in information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic.Google Scholar
Denckla, M. B. & Rudel, R. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C & Wilce, L. S. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled andless skilled beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75,3–18.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (1979). Apprehending spelling patternsfor vowels: A developmental study. Language and Speech, 22, 243–251.Google Scholar
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C. & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 73–83.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, U.K.:Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jorm, A. F. (1983). Determinants of individual differences in reading achievement. AustralianJournal of Psychology, 35, 163–174.Google Scholar
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first tofourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.Google Scholar
Landerl, K., Linortner, R. & Wimmer, H. (1992). Phonologische Bewußtheit und Schrift-spracherwerb [Phonological awareness and reading acquisition]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 6(1), 17–32.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C. & Fischer, F. W. (1977).Phonetic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reading. In Reber, A. S. & Scarborough, D.L. (Eds.), Towards a psychology of reading (pp. 207–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lovegrove, W., Garcia, R. P. & Nicholson, S. B. (1990). Experimental evidence for a transient system deficit in specific reading disability. Journal of the American OptometricAssociation, 61, 137–146.Google ScholarPubMed
Lovett, M. W. (1987). A developmental approach to reading disability: Accuracy and speedcriteria of normal and deficient reading skill. Child Development, 58, 234–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manis, F. R., Szeszulski, P. A., Holt, L. K. & Graves, K. (1988). A developmental perspectiveon dyslexia subtypes. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. A. (1984). Longitudinal prediction and prevention of early reading difficulty. An-nals of Dyslexia, 34, 117–136.Google Scholar
Mannhaupt, G. & Jansen, H. (1989). Phonologische BewuBtheit: Aufgabenentwicklung undLeistungen im Vorschulalter [Phonological awareness: Development of tasks andachievement in preschool children]. Heilpädagogische Forschung, 15, 50–56.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. C. (1984). Toward a rational taxonomy of developmental dyslexia. In Malatesha, R. N. & Whitaker, H. A. (Eds.), Dyslexia: A global issue. The Hague, Netherlands: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. C. & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 175–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolson, R. I. & Fawcett, A. J. (1990). Automaticity: A new framework for dyslexia research. Cognition, 35, 159–182.Google Scholar
Olson, R., Wise, B., Connors, F. & Rack, J. (1990). Organisation, heritability, and remediation of component word recognition and language skills in disabled readers. In Carr, T. & Levy, (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 261–322). London: Academic.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learningto read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.Google Scholar
Pregel, D. & Rickheit, G. (1987). Der Wortschatz im Grundschulalter [The vocabulary inprimary school children]. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J. & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27 (1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rott, C. & Zielinski, W. (1986). Entwicklungsstufen der Lesefertigkeit in der Grundschule[Developmental stages of reading ability in primary school]. Zeitschrift fur Entwick-lungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie, 18, 165–175.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. & Gleitman, L. R. (1977). The structure and acquisition of reading II: The readingprocess and the acquisition of the alphabetic principle. In Reber, A. S. & Scarborough, D. L. (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading (pp. 55–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., Bruck, M., Fornarolo, G. & Backman, J. (1985). Word recognition processes of poor and disabled readers: Do they necessarily differ? Applied Psycholin-guistics, 6, 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Mattingly, (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 293–317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1988). Development of grammatical sensitivity, phonological,and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowling, M. (1981). Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia. Psychological Research,43, 219–234.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. (1987). Dyslexia: A cognitive developmental perspective. Oxford: Black well.Google Scholar
Snowling, M., Goulandris, N., Bowlby, M. & Howell, P. (1986). Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: A developmental analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 489–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spring, C. & Capps, C. (1974). Encoding speed, rehearsal, and probed recall of dyslexic boys. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66,780–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spring, C. & Davis, J. (1988). Relations of digit naming speed with three components of reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 315–334.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differencesin the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 278–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. C, Lean, D. & Schwartz, S. (1989). Pseudoword repetition ability in learning-disabled children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 203–219.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. & Houck, D. (1980). Processing deficiencies in learning disabled children whoperform poorly on the digit span test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 141–160.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Goswami, U. & Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications forreading development and theory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 559–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causalrule in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H. & Frith, U. (1991, September). Reading development in German and English children.Paper presented at the developmental conference of the British PsychologicalSociety,Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. & Hummer, P. (1990). How German speaking first graders read and spell:Doubt on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R. & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemicawareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still impor-tant. Cognition, 40, 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., Zwicker, T. & Gugg, D. (1991). Schwierigkeiten beim Lesen und beimSchreiben in den ersten Schuljahren: Befunde zur Persistenz und Verursachung [Difficulties in reading and spelling during the first years of school: Findings concerningpersistence and causation]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 280–298.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (1991a). Naming and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123–140.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (1991b, 04). ‘Word-wraiths”: The unique contribution of the naming system to reading prediction and intervention in developmental dyslexia. Paper presented at the biennialmeeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Bally, H. & Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes and reading: Alongitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.Google Scholar