Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions

  • Shaofeng Li (a1), Rod Ellis (a2) and Yan Zhu (a3)

Abstract

This study examines the effects of two cognitive abilities—language analytic ability (LAA) and working memory (WM)—on language learning under five different instructional conditions. One hundred fifty eighth-grade English as a foreign language learners underwent a 2-hr treatment session. They were divided into five groups based on whether and when they received form-focused instruction. One group received pretask instruction on the linguistic target (English passive voice) before performing two narrative tasks; a second group received within-task feedback but no pretask instruction; a third group received both pretask instruction and within-task feedback; a fourth group received feedback after completing the tasks; and the fifth group only performed the tasks. The results showed that (a) LAA was predictive of the posttest scores of the group that only performed the communicative tasks and the group who received posttask feedback, (b) WM was associated with the learning outcomes of the two groups receiving within-task feedback, and (c) neither cognitive variable was implicated in the group that received pretask instruction before performing the tasks. The results suggest that the impact of LAA is evident when there is less external assistance and that WM is involved when learners face the heavy processing burden imposed by within-task feedback.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: sli9@fsu.edu

References

Hide All
Baddeley, A. (2015). Working memory in second language learning. In Mota, M., and McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 1728). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158173.
Bowles, M. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge: What can heritage learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247271.
Carroll, J. (1990). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In Parry, T., and Stansfield, C. (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 1129). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (2002). Manual for the MLAT. Princeton, NJ: Second Language Testing.
Cerezo, L., Caras, A., & Leow, R. (2016). The effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish Gustar structures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 265291.
Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32, 867873.
Cronbach, J. L., & Furby, L. (1970) How should we measure ‘change’-or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74(1), 6880.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450466.
DeKeyser, R. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62, 189200.
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B., and Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In Doughty, C., and Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141172.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339368.
Engel de Abreu, P. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (2012). Executive and phonological processes in second-language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 974986.
Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9, 147171.
Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27, 464491.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
French, L. M., & O’Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children’s second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 463487.
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445474.
Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 423449.
Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(3), 379400.
Hummel, K. (2009). Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proficiency in nonnovice adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 225249.
Hwu, F., & Sun, S. (2012). The aptitude-treatment interaction effects on the learning of grammar rules. System, 40, 505521.
Hwu, F., Wei, P., & Sun, S. (2014). Aptitude-treatment interaction effects on explicit rule learning: A latent growth curve analysis. Language Teaching Research, 18, 294319.
Kempe, V., Brooks, P., & Kharkhurin, A. (2010). Cognitive predictors of generalization of Russian grammatical gender categories. Language Learning, 60, 127153.
Kim, J., & Nam, H. Measures of implicit knowledge revisited: Processing modes, time pressure, and modality. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 431457.
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015). The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549581.
Krashen, S. (1981). Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. In Diller, K. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 155175). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Leeser, M. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57, 229270.
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309365.
Li, S. (2013a). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97, 634654.
Li, S. (2013b). The differential roles of language analytic ability and working memory in mediating the effects of two types of feedback on the acquisition of an opaque linguistic structure. In Sanz, C., and Lado, B. (Eds.), Individual differences, L2 development & language program administration: From theory to application (pp. 3252). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Li, S. (2014). Recasts, working memory, and the choice of target structure. In Han, Z. (Ed.), Second language acquisition of Chinese: A series of empirical studies (pp. 103125). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Li, S. (2015a). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36, 385408.
Li, S. (2015b). The differential roles of working memory and language analytic ability in mediating the effects of recasts as a function of learner proficiency. In Wen, Z., Mota, M., and MacNeil, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theory, research and commentary (pp. 139159). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Li, S. (2016). The construct validity of language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801842.
Li, S. (2017a). Cognitive differences and ISLA. In Loewen, S., and Sato, M. (Eds.), Handbook of instructed second language learning (pp. 396417). New York: Routledge.
Li, S. (2017b). The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction: A synthetic review. In Gurzynski, L. (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors and researchers (pp. 4170). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Li, S. (2018). Language aptitude. In Burns, A., and Richards, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to learning English as a second language (pp. 6372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linck, J., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861883.
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley.
Long, M. (2016). In defence of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 533.
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive international feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471497.
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 179413.
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests. Swansea: Lognostics.
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417528.
Pimsleur, P., Reed, D., & Stansfield, C. (2004). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB). Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878912.
Reber, A. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219235.
Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93132.
Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 4599.
Sachs, R. (2010). Individual differences and the effectiveness of visual feedback of reflexive binding in L2 Japanese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University).
Sanz, C., Lin, H., Lado, B., Stafford, C., & Bowden, H. (2016). One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics, 37, 669692.
Serafini, E., & Sanz, C. (2016). Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 607646.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301322). New York: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 3862.
Skehan, P. (2012). Language aptitude. In Gass, S., and Mackey, A. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 381395). New York: Routledge.
Snow, R. E. (1991). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 205216.
Spada, N. (2011). Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225236.
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2016). Exploratory research on second language practice distribution: An Aptitude × Treatment interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1017/S0142716416000084
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471484). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 5179.
Wen, Z. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The phonological/executive model. In Wen, Z., Mailce, B., and McNeill, A. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N. (2016). Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty: An EFL classroom-based study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 239263.
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344368.
Zhang, R. (2015). Measuring university-level L2 learners’ implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 457486.
Zimmerman, D. W., & Williams, R. H. (1982). Gain scores in research can be highly reliable. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19(2), 149154.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed