Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Adaptation to syntactic structures in native and nonnative sentence comprehension

  • EDITH KAAN (a1), CORINNE FUTCH (a1), RAQUEL FERNÁNDEZ FUERTES (a2), SONJA MUJCINOVIC (a2) and ESTHER ÁLVAREZ DE LA FUENTE (a2)...

Abstract

Previous research suggests that native speakers quickly adapt to the properties of the language in the surrounding context. For instance, as they repeatedly read a structure that is initially nonpreferred or infrequent, they show a reduction of processing difficulty. Adaptation has been accounted for in terms of error-based learning: the error resulting from the difference between the expected and actual input leads to an adjustment of the knowledge representation, which changes future expectations. The present study tested whether experiencing an error is sufficient for adaptation. We compared native English speakers and second language (L2) learners’ processing of, and adaptation to, two types of temporarily ambiguous structures that were resolved toward the nonpreferred interpretation. Whereas both native English and L2 speakers showed increased reading times at the disambiguating word versus a nonambiguous control, our data suggest that only native English speakers adapted, and only to one of the two structures. These results suggest that experiencing an error is not sufficient for adaptation, and that factors such as ease of revision and task effects may play a role as well.

Copyright

Corresponding author

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Edith Kaan, Department of Linguistics, University of Florida, Box 115454, Gainesville, FL 32611. E-mail: kaan@ufl.edu

References

Hide All
Aldwayan, S., Fiorentino, R., & Gabriele, A. (2010). Evidence of syntactic constraints in the processing of wh-movement. A study of Najdi Arabic learners of English. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language reading and parsing (pp. 6586). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Atkinson, E., & Omaki, A. (2016). Adaptation of gap predictions in filler-gap dependency processing. Paper presented at the 29th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Gainesville, FL.
Baayen, H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 1228.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1987). Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language Learning, 37, 385407. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00577.x
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory & Language, 68 255278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. ArXiv e-print. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04967 (ArXiv e-print).
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 148. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114, 455461. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.005
Bock, K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355387. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6
Box, G. E., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 26, 211252.
Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 14821493. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482
Brennan, S. E., & Hanna, J. E. (2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 274291. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01019.x
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234272. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.113.2.234
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 342.
Conroy, M. A., & Antón-Méndez, I. (2015). A preposition is something you can end a sentence with: Learning English stranded prepositions through structural priming. Second Language Research, 31, 211237. doi: 10.1177/0267658314555945
Crain, S., & Fodor, J. D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 94128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cunnings, I. (2017). Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 659678.
Dallas, A. C. (2008). Influences of verbal properties on second-language filler-gap resolution: A cross-methodological study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).
Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990–present. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
Dekydtspotter, L., Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (2006). The comparative fallacy in L2 processing research. In M. G. O’Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 33–40). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Dussias, P. E., & Cramer Scaltz, T. R. (2008). Spanish-English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Acta Psychologia, 128, 501513.
Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., Yan, S., Cheimariou, S., & Jaeger, T. F. (2014). Error-driven learning of higher-level expectancies during reading. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2181–2186). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C., & Clahsen, H. (2012). The timing of island effects in nonnative sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 6798. doi: 10.1017/S0272263111000507
Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2013). Evidence for implicit learning in syntactic comprehension. Cognitive Science, 37, 578591. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12022
Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013). Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PLOS ONE, 8, 118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077661
Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (2000). Syntactic features in reanalysis: Positive and negative symptoms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 2536. doi:10.1023/A:1005168206061
Frazier, L. (1987). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5, 519559.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1989). Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 93126. doi:10.1080/01690968908406359
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 176. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain (pp. 95126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, J. (2001). A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. Paper presented at the second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language Technologies, Pittsburgh, June 1–7, 2001.
Harrington Stack, C. M., James, A. N., & Watson, D. G. (2018). A failure to replicate rapid syntactic adaptation in comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 46, 864–877. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0808-6.
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75, B27B39. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00080-3
Hoeks, J. C. J., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). Processing coordinated structures in context: The effect of topic-structure on ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 99119. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2800
Hopp, H. (2015). Semantics and morphosyntax in predictive L2 sentence processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 277306. doi: 10.1515/iral-2015-0014
Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401410.
Jacob, G., & Felser, C. (2016). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 907925. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.984231
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127, 5783. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013
Kaan, E. (2015). Knowing without predicting, predicting without learning. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5, 482486. doi: 10.1075/lab.5.4.07kaa
Kaan, E., & Chun, E. (2018). Priming and adaptation in native speakers and second-language learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 228242. doi: 10.1017/S1366728916001231
Kaan, E., Kirkham, J., & Wijnen, F. (2016). Prediction and integration in native and second-language processing of elliptical structures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 118. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000844
Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Is long-term structural priming affected by patterns of experience with individual verbs? Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 862878. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.002
Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2004). This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 450467. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.450
Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., & Borreggine, K. L. (2006). Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming. Cognition, 99, B73B82. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.002
Klein, E. C. (1995). Evidence of a wild grammar. When PPs rear their empty heads. Applied Linguistics, 16, 87117.
Klein, E. C. (2003). Toward second language acquisition. A study of null-prep. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kleinmann, H. H. (1978a). Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 27, 93107.
Kleinmann, H. H. (1978b). The strategy of avoidance in adult second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 157174). New York: Academic Press.
Kraljic, T., Samuel, A. G., & Brennan, S. E. (2008). First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological Science, 19, 332338.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2016). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models (Version R package version 2.0-33). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavioral Research, 44, 325343. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 11261177. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2010). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 447464. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.07.003
Martin, C., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 574588. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001
Myslín, M., & Levy, R. (2016). Comprehension priming as rational expectation for repetition: Evidence from syntactic processing. Cognition, 147, 2956. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.021
Omaki, A., Lau, E. F., Davidson White, I., Dakan, M. L., Apple, A., & Phillips, C. (2015). Hyper-active gap filling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00384
Omaki, A., & Schulz, B. (2011). Filler-gap dependencies and island constaints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 563588. doi: 10.1017/S0272263111000313
Pajak, B., Fine, A. B., Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). Learning additional languages as hierarchical probabilistic inference: Insights from first language processing. Language Learning, 66, 900944. doi: 10.1111/lang.12168
Peter, M., Chang, F., Pine, J. M., Blything, R., & Rowland, C. F. (2015). When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 115. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.12.002
Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2015). Revise and resubmit: How real-time parsing limitations influence grammar acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 73108. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.03.004
Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2016). Second language processing and revision of garden-path sentences: A visual word study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 636643. doi: 10.1017/S1366728915000838
R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35, 587637. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01165.x
Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 299331. doi:10.1017/S0142716410000421
Schmid, H.-J. (2007). Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. In D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens, & H.-J. Schmid (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 117138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stowe, L. A. (1986). Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227245. doi:10.1080/01690968608407062
Swets, B., Desmet, T., Clifton, C., & Ferreira, F. (2008). Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory & Cognition, 36, 201216. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.1.201
Traxler, M., & Tooley, K. (2008). Priming in sentence comprehension: Strategic or syntactic? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 609645. doi: 10.1080/01690960701639898
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Jacob, G. (2006). The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden-path sentences: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 335362. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.004
Víquez, A. J. C. (2012). Online processing of wh-dependencies in English by native speakers of Spanish. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas).
Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 250271. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002.
Williams, J. N., Möbius, P., & Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 509540.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Kaan et al. supplementary material
Kaan et al. supplementary material

 Word (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed