Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-9dmbd Total loading time: 0.488 Render date: 2021-03-03T00:41:28.154Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Exploring variation in nonnative Japanese learners’ perception of lexical pitch accent: The roles of processing resources and learning context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2019

Seth Goss
Affiliation:
Emory University
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This article reports findings on the effects of processing resources and learning context on the perceptual learning of lexical pitch accent in beginning nonnative Japanese learners. Native English speakers in at-home and study-abroad contexts were tested twice during a semester of Japanese study on their ability to judge the correctness of and categorize nouns by their pitch pattern. Regression analyses indicated that the ability to store nonnative-like sound sequences in phonological short-term memory (PSTM), as well as auditory processing ability, predicted a significant degree of perceptual gains made over a 12-week interval. However, these predictors were task specific in that PSTM capacity predicted correctness judgment gains, while auditory processing accounted for variation in categorization. Furthermore, despite learners in the at-home context performing slightly better overall, processing resources adhered to the same predictive pattern when context was taken into account. The results suggest that (a) neither increased input during study-abroad nor targeted instruction is sufficient for most learners to acquire lexical accent; (b) processing resources support the acquisition of lexical prosody, but these may depend on how learning is assessed; and (c) PSTM operates across learning contexts, suggesting it to be a domain-general capacity in early-stage nonnative language acquisition.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Amano, N., & Kondo, K. (1999). Lexical properties of Japanese: Vol. 1. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Amano, N., & Kondo, K. (2000). Lexical properties of Japanese: Vol. 7. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62 (Suppl.), 4978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, M., & Chin, J. (2018). What can lexical tone training studies in adults tell us about tone processing in children? Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asaridou, S., & McQueen, J. (2013). Speech and music shape the listening brain: evidence for shared domain-general mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arai, M. (1997). The results of a longitudinal survey on the perception of the Tokyo accent: American learners living in Kyoto. Spoken Japanese language education: Looking to the 21st century (pp. 7379). Tokyo: National Language Research Institute.Google Scholar
Ayusawa, T. (2003). Acquisition of Japanese accent and intonation by foreign learners. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 7, 4758.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. A. (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 4790). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Version 1.1.–7. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 Google Scholar
Beckman, M., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bent, T., Bradlow, A., & Wright, B. (2006). The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and nonspeech sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 97103.Google ScholarPubMed
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, Version 6.0.39. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/ Google Scholar
Bowles, A., Chang, C., & Karuzis, V. (2016). Pitch ability as an aptitude for tone learning. Language Learning, 66, 774808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, D., & Mattock, K. (2007). The perception of tones and phones. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 259280). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32, 867873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collentine, J. (2004). The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 227248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2004). Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 153171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A., & Wang, Y. (2012). The influence of linguistic and musical experience on Cantonese word learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 47564769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, L., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure “change”: Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 6880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., & Otake, T. (1999). Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 18771888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalecki, M., & Willits, F. (1991). Examining change using regression analysis: Three approaches compared. Sociological Spectrum, 11, 127145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. (1995). Language learning and study abroad. In Freed, B. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 333). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujisaki, H., & Kawashima, T. (1969). On the modes and mechanisms of speech perception. Annual Report of the Engineering Research Institute, 28, 6773.Google Scholar
Gerrits, E., & Schouten, M. (2004). Categorical perception depends on the discrimination task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 363376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goss, S. (2018). A critical pedagogy of lexical accent in L2 Japanese: Insights into research and practice. Japanese Language and Literature, 52, 126.Google Scholar
Goss, S., & Tamaoka, K. (2015). Predicting lexical accent perception in native Japanese speakers: An investigation of acoustic pitch sensitivity and working memory. Japanese Psychological Research, 57, 143154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, S., & Tamaoka, K. (2019). Lexical accent perception in highly-proficient L2 Japanese learners: The roles of language-specific experience and domain-general resources. Second Language Research, 35, 351376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, S., Cox, J., Serafini, E., & Sanz, C. (2015). The role of individual differences in the study abroad context: Cognitive capacity and language development during short-term intensive language exposure. Modern Language Journal, 99, 137157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallé, P., Chang, Y., & Best, C. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 395421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinneburg, A., Mannila, H., Kaislaniemi, S., Nevalainen, T., & Raumolin-Bruberg, H. (2007). How to handle small samples: Bootstrap and Bayesian methods in the analysis of linguistic change. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22, 137150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, Y. (1999). Acquisition of Japanese rhythm and pitch accent by English native speakers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).Google Scholar
Hirata, Y. (2004). Effects of speaking rate on the vowel length distinction in Japanese. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 565589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, Y. (2015). L2 Phonetics and Phonology. In Kubozono, H., (Ed.), Phonetics & Phonology Volume: The Handbook of Japanese Language and Linguistics, 719762. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, C. (2003). Phonological memory, phonological awareness, and foreign language word learning. Language Learning, 53, 429462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2015). Predictive processing of novel compounds: Evidence from Japanese. Cognition, 136, 350358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huensch, A., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017). Understanding second language fluency behavior: The effects of individual differences in first language fluency, cross-linguistic differences, and proficiency over time. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 755785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, K. (2009). Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proficiency in nonnovice adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 225249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, K., & French, L. (2010). Phonological memory and implications for the second language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 371391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, J., & Mester, A. (2016). Unaccentedness in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry, 47, 471526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, K., & Speer, S. (2008). Anticipatory effects of intonation: Eye movements during instructed visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 541573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorden, E., & Noda, M. (1987). Japanese: The spoken language, Part 1. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M. (2012). Cognitive mechanisms of word learning in bilingual and monolingual adults: The role of phonological memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 470489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitahara, M. (2001). Category structure and function of pitch accent in Tokyo Japanese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington).Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Safar, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, B. (2008). Intonational phonology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, W., Murashima, K., & Shirai, Y. (2006). Prosodic development in the acquisition of Japanese: A longitudinal study of three native speakers of Cantonese. Japan Journal, 10, 3851.Google Scholar
MacKay, I., Meador, D., & Flege, J. (2001). The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica, 58, 103125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandel, J. (2009). Adaptive pitch test. Available from http://tonometric.com/adaptivepitch/ Google Scholar
Martin, K., & Ellis, N. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 379413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. (2013). A reexamination of ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: Length of immersion, motivation, and phonological short-term memory. In Voss, E., Tai, S.-J. D., & Li, Z. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2011 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 148161). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Nishinuma, Y., Arai, M., & Ayusawa, T. (1996). Perception of tonal accent by Americans learning Japanese. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 377402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 557581.Google Scholar
Perrachione, T., Lee, J., Ha, L., & Wong, P. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 461472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakamoto, E. (2010). An investigation of factors behind foreign accent in the L2 acquisition of Japanese lexical pitch accent by adult English speakers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Schaefer, V., & Darcy, I. (2014). Linguistic prominence of pitch within the native language determines accuracy of tone processing. In Miller, R. T., Martin, K. I., Eddington, C. M., Henery, A., Miguel, N. M., Tseng, A. M., … Walter, D. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2012 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 114). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Sekiguchi, T., & Nakajima, Y. (1999). The use of lexical prosody for lexical access of the Japanese language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 439454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibata, T., & Hurtig, R. (2008). Prosody acquisition by Japanese learners. In Han, Z.. (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 176204). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Shibata, T., & Shibata, R. (1990) Akusento wa doo’ongo o donoteido benbetsu shiuruno ka? Nihongo, eigo, chuugokugo no baai [How much can accent distinguish homophones? Cases of Japanese, English and Chinese]. Mathematical Linguistics, 17, 317327.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shport, I. (2008). Acquisition of Japanese pitch accent by American learners. In Heinrich, P. & Sugita, Y. (Eds.), Japanese as foreign language in the age of globalization (pp. 165187). München: Iudicium Verlag.Google Scholar
Shport, I. (2015). Perception of acoustic cues to Tokyo Japanese pitch-accent contrasts in native Japanese and naïve English listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138, 307318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shport, I. (2016). Training English listeners to identify pitch accent patterns in Tokyo Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 739769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, C., & Best, C. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53, 273293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speciale, G., Ellis, N., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 293321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., & Shafer, V. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. In Edwards, J. G. Hansen & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 153191). Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. (2009). When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resource threshold effect. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 7999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaoka, K. (2014). The Japanese writing system and lexical understanding. Japanese Language and Literature, 48, 431471.Google Scholar
Tanaka, S., & Kubozono, H. (2012). Nihongo no hatsuon kyooshitsu: Riron to renshuu [Introduction to Japanese pronunciation: Theory and practice]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. (2011). Variability and systematicity in individual learners’ Japanese accent. Pozanan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47, 146158.Google Scholar
Tsurutani, C. (2011). L2 intonation: A study of L1 transfer in Japanese intonation by English-speaking learners. Second Language, 10, 79102.Google Scholar
Wayland, R., & Guion, S. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54, 681712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R., Herrera, E., & Kaan, E. (2010). Effects of musical experience and training on pitch contour perception. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 654662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. (2014). Theorizing and measuring working memory in first and second language research. Language Teaching, 47, 174190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J., & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 53, 67121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, P., & Perrachione, T. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 565585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 26
Total number of PDF views: 202 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 26th November 2019 - 3rd March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Exploring variation in nonnative Japanese learners’ perception of lexical pitch accent: The roles of processing resources and learning context
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Exploring variation in nonnative Japanese learners’ perception of lexical pitch accent: The roles of processing resources and learning context
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Exploring variation in nonnative Japanese learners’ perception of lexical pitch accent: The roles of processing resources and learning context
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *