Skip to main content Accessibility help

The social context of early pottery in the Lingnan region of south China

  • Richard Pearson (a1)


Late Pleistocene and early post-Pleistocene communities in East Asia experimented with pottery production and the domestication of plants and animals. What was the nature of the social organisation of these early small-scale societies? Some North American writers consider pottery making to be a ‘prestige technology’ sponsored by aggrandising individuals. However, examples from south of the Nanling Mountains and other areas have simple tool assemblages and site plans showing very little evidence of social differences. Judging from recent debates about social agency, there are more appropriate explanations for the earliest pottery making, which focus on the collective rather than the individual.



Hide All
Brumfiel, E. 2000. On the archaeology of choice: agency studies as a research paradigm, in Dobres, M. & Robb, J. (ed.) Agency in archaeology: 249–63. London and New York: Routledge.
Cao, B. in press. The earliest ceramics in China: the findings, contents, and a preliminary interpretation. Journal of East Asian Archaeology.
Chang, K.C. 1986. The archaeology of ancient China. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Clark, J. & Gosser, D.. 1995. Reinventing Mesoamerica’s first pottery, in Barnett, W.K. & Hoopes, J.W. (ed.) The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation: 209–22. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Dobres, M. & Robb, J.. (ed.). 2000. Agency in archaeology. London and New York: Routledge.
Fu, X. 2001. Guilin diqu shiqian wenhua mianmao lunkuo chuxian/The prehistoric framework of prehistoric Guilin. Wen wu Bao April 4: 1.
Fu, X. 2002. Guangxi di ige shiqian kaoguxue wenhua – Huning Dingsishan yizhi, in Li, Wenru, (ed.) Zhongguo shinian baida kaogu xinfaxian/Top 100 New Archaeological Discoveries of China 1990–1999: 236–42. Beijing: Wenwu Publishing House.
Haaland, R. 1997. Emergence of sedentism: new ways of living, new ways of symbolizing. Antiquity 71: 374–85.
Hayden, B. 1995. The emergence of prestige technologies and pottery, in Barnett, W.K. & Hoopes, J.W. (ed.) The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation: 257–66. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Hayden, B. 1998. Practical and prestige technologies: the evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5: 155.
Hegmon, M. 2003. Setting theoretical egos aside: issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity 68: 213–44.
Hodder, I. 2000. Agency and individuals in long term process, in Dobres, M. & Robb, J. (ed.) Agency in archaeology: 2133. London and New York: Routledge.
Institute Of Archaeology, Cass. 1991. Radiocarbon dates in Chinese archaeology. Beijing: Wenwu Chubanshe.
Jiao, T. 1994. Gengshinshi mozhi quanxinshi chu Lingnan diqu de shiqian wenhua/Prehistoric cultures of the Lingnan area from the Late Pleistocene to the beginning of the Holocene. Kaogu Xuebao 1: 124.
Johnson, M. 2000. Self made men and the strategy of agency, in Dobres, M. & Robb, J. (ed.) Agency in Archaeology: 213231. London and New York: Routledge.
Keally, C., Taniguchi, Y. & Kuzmin, Y.. 2003. Understanding the beginnings of pottery technology in Japan and neighbouring East Asia. The Review of Archaeology 24 (2): 314.
Keally, C., Taniguchi, Y. Kuzmin, Y. & Shewkomud, I.. 2004. Chronology of the beginning of pottery manufacture in East Asia. Radiocarbon 46: 345–51.
Kuzmin, Y. (ed.). 2003. The nature of the transition from the Paleolithic to the Neolithic in East Asia and the Pacific. The Review of Archaeology, Special Issue. 24: 13.
Li, G. 2002. Subsistence of Neolithic Pearl River Area, south China. MA Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of British Columbia.
Lu, T.L.D. in press. Early pottery in South China and its archaeological significance. Journal of East Asian Archaeology.
Obata, H. 2003. Shiberia: Enkaishu/Siberia and the Russian Maritime Province. Kikan Kokogaku 83: 8084.
Onuki, S. 2003. Chugoku nanbu – Reinan sanmyaku no kita to minami/South China – north and south of the Lingnan mountains. Kikan Kokogaku 83: 759.
Ren, S. 1995. Gongyuanqian wuqian nian Zhongguo xinshiqi wenhua de jixiang zhuyao chengjiu/Important results from the Neolithic cultures in China earlier than 5000 BC. Kaogu 1: 3749.
Rice, P. 1999. On the origins of pottery. Journal of Anthropological Method and Theory 6: 154.
Robb, J.E. (ed.). 1999. Material symbols: culture and economy in prehistory. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 26.
Roosevelt, A. 1995. Early pottery in the Amazon: twenty years of scholarly obscurity, in Barnett, W.K. & Hoopes, J.W. (ed.) The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation: 115–31. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Saitta, D. 1997. Review of Foundations of Social Inequality, by Price, T.D. & Feinman, G. (ed.) Plains Anthropologist 42: 263–5.
Saitta, D. 1999. Prestige, agency, and change in middle range societies, in Robb, J. (ed.) Material symbols: culture and economy in prehistory: 135–49. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Underhill, A. 1997. Current issues in Chinese Neolithic archaeology. Journal of World Prehistory 11: 103–60.
Wu, X. & Zhao, C.. 2003. Chronology of the Transition from Paleolithic to Neolithic in China. The Review of Archaeology 24: 1520.
Zhang, C. 2002. The discovery of early pottery in China. Documenta Praehistorica XXIX: 2935.
Zhang, F. 2000. The mesolithic in south China. Documenta Praehistorica XXVII: 225–31.
Zhang, W. & Yuan, J.. 1998. A preliminary study of ancient excavated rice from Yuchanyan Site, Dao County, Hunan Province, PRC. Acta Agronomica Sinica 244: 416–20.
Zhao, C. & Wu, X.. 2000. The dating of Chinese early pottery and a discussion of some related problems. Documenta Praehistorica XXVII: 233–9.
Zhao, Z. 1998. The Middle Yangtze Region in China is one place where rice was domesticated: phytolith evidence from the Diaotonghuan Cave, northern Jiangxi. Antiquity 72: 885–97.
Shehui Kexueyuan Kaogu Yanjiusuo, Zhongguo, Zhuang Minzujigu Wenwu Gongzuotuan, Gwangxi, Zengpiyan Izhi Bowuguan, Guilin, Shi Wenwu Gonzuotuan, Guilin (ed.). 2003. Guilin Zengpiyan (Zengpiyan, Guilin). Beijing: Wenwu Chubanshe.


The social context of early pottery in the Lingnan region of south China

  • Richard Pearson (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed