Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:07:06.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primordialism and the ‘Pleistocene San’ of southern Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Justin Pargeter ,
Alex MacKay ,
Peter Mitchell ,
John Shea  and
Brian A. Stewart
Justin Pargeter
Affiliation:
Interdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA (Email: justin.pargeter@stonybrook.edu) Department of Anthropology and Development Studies, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa
Alex MacKay
Affiliation:
Centre for Archaeological Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Peter Mitchell
Affiliation:
School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, Wits 2050, South Africa School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, 36 Beaumont Street, Oxford OX1 2PG, UK
John Shea
Affiliation:
Anthropology Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Brian A. Stewart
Affiliation:
Museum of Anthropological Archaeology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079, USA Rock Art Research Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, Wits 2050, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analogies are an important tool of archaeological reasoning. The Kalahari San are frequently depicted in introductory texts as archetypal, mobile hunter-gatherers, and they have influenced approaches to archaeological, genetic and linguistic research. But is this analogy fundamentally flawed? Recent arguments have linked the San populations of southern Africa with the late Pleistocene Later Stone Age (c. 44 kya) at Border Cave, South Africa. The authors argue that these and other claims for the Pleistocene antiquity of modern-day cultures arise from a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of cultural and archaeological taxonomies, and that they are a misuse of analogical reasoning.

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 90 , Issue 352 , August 2016 , pp. 1072 - 1079
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balicki, A. 1970. The Netsilik Eskimo. Prospect Heights (NY): Waveland.Google Scholar
Barnard, A. 1992. Hunters and herders of southern Africa: a comparative ethnography of the Khoisan peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayart, J.-F., Rendall, S., Roitman, J.-L. & Derrick, J.. 2005. The illusion of cultural identity. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Biesele, M., Gordon, R., Lee, R.B. & Marshall, L.. 1986. The past and future of !Kung ethnography: critical reflections and symbolic perspectives. Hamburg: H. Buske.Google Scholar
Borrero, B. & Borella, F.. 2010. Harpoons and travellers: Fuegian ethnographic collections and the recent archaeological record. Before Farming 2010 (1): article 3.Google Scholar
Carter, E. & Campbell, S.. 2000. Preliminary report on the 1998 season of excavations at Domuztepe, in 21st Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı: 133–42. Ankara: T.C. Kültür ve Türizm Bakanliği, Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü.Google Scholar
d'Errico, F., Backwell, L., Villa, P., Degano, I., Lucejko, J.J., Bamford, M.K., Higham, T.F.G., Colombini, M.P. & Beaumont, P.B.. 2012. Early evidence of San material culture represented by organic artifacts from Border Cave, South Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109: 13214–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204213109 Google Scholar
Denbow, J.R. 1984. Prehistoric herders and foragers of the Kalahari: the evidence of 1500 years of interaction, in Schrire, C. (ed.) Past and present in hunter-gatherer studies. Orlando (FL): Academic.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1963. The integrative revolution: primordial sentiments and politics in the new states, in Geertz, C. (ed.) Old societies and new states: the quest for modernity in Asia and Africa: 105–19. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.J. 1992. The Bushman myth: the making of a Namibian underclass. Boulder (CO): Westview.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A. 1969. Subsistence behavior among the Western Desert Aborigines of Australia. Oceania 39: 253–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.1969.tb01026.x Google Scholar
Güldemann, T. 2008. A linguist's view: Khoe-Kwadi speakers as the earliest food-producers of southern Africa. Southern African Humanities 20: 93–132.Google Scholar
Henshilwood, C.S. & Marean, C.. 2006. Remodelling the origins of modern behaviour, in Soodyall, H. (ed.) The prehistory of Africa: tracing the lineage of modern man: 31–46. Jeppestown: Jonathan Ball.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, M. 1983. An examination of the hunting-dependent life of the Mbuti Pygmies, eastern Zaire. African Study Monographs 4: 55–76.Google Scholar
Isaacs, H. 1974. Basic group identity: idols of the tribe. Ethnicity 1: 15–42.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 1997. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203438732 Google Scholar
Kelly, R.L. 2013. The lifeways of hunter-gatherers: the foraging spectrum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139176132 Google Scholar
Kim, H.L., Ratan, A., Perry, G.H., Montenegro, A., Miller, W. & Schuster, S.C.. 2014. Khoisan hunter-gatherers have been the largest population throughout most of modern-human demographic history. Nature Communications 5: article 5692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139176132 Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1988. The invention of primitive society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lane, P.J. 1994–1995. The use and abuse of ethnography in the study of the southern African Iron Age. Azania 29–30: 51–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00672709409511661 Google Scholar
Lee, R.B. & DeVore, I. (ed.). 1976. Kalahari hunter-gatherers. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674430600 Google Scholar
Lombard, M. & Parsons, I.. 2011. What happened to the human mind after the Howiesons Poort? Antiquity 85: 1433–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00062153 Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Wadley, L., Deacon, J., Wurz, S., Parsons, I., Mohapi, M., Swart, J. & Mitchell, P.J.. 2012. South African and Lesotho Stone Age sequence updates (I). South African Archaeological Bulletin 67: 123–40.Google Scholar
McGranaghan, M. 2014. ‘Different people’ coming together: representations of alterity in /Xam Bushman (San) narrative. Critical Arts 28: 670–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2014.929223 Google Scholar
Mitchell, P.J. 2002. The archaeology of southern Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P.J. 2010. Genetics and southern African prehistory: an archaeological view. Journal of Anthropological Science 88: 73–92.Google Scholar
Montagu, M.F.A. 1945. Man's most dangerous myth: the fallacy of race. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ouzman, S. 1997. Between margin and centre: the archaeology of southern African bored stones, in Wadley, L. (ed.) Our gendered past: archaeological studies of gender in southern Africa: 71–106. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Schrire, C. 1984. Wild surmises on savage thoughts, in Schrire, C. (ed.) Past and present in hunter-gatherer studies. Orlando (FL): Academic.Google Scholar
Shea, J.J. 2011. Homo sapiens is as Homo sapiens was: behavioural variability vs ‘behavioural modernity’ in Palaeolithic archaeology. Current Anthropology 52: 1–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/658067 Google Scholar
Shennan, S. 2009. Pattern and process in cultural evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sollas, W.J. 1911. Ancient hunters and their modern representatives. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Solway, J.S. & Lee, R.B.. 1990. Foragers, genuine or spurious? Situating the Kalahari San in history. Current Anthropology 31: 109–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/203816 Google Scholar
Stringer, C.B. 2012. Lone survivors: how we came to be the only humans on Earth. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Survival. 2010. Botswana president in racist outburst against Kalahari Bushmen, 10 December 2010. Available at: http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/6754 (accessed 9 February 2016).Google Scholar
Sutton, E.A. 2014. Digging stick weights and doughnut stones: an analysis of perforated stones from the Santa Barbara Channel region. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 34: 17–42.Google Scholar
Van Reybrouck, D. 2012. From primitives to primates: a history of ethnographic and primatological analogies in the study of prehistory. Leiden: Sidestone.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1989. Archaeological cables and tacking: the implications of practice for Bernstein's options beyond objectivism and relativism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19: 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004839318901900101 Google Scholar
Wilmsen, E.N. & Denbow, J.R.. 1990. Paradigmatic history of San-speaking peoples and current attempts at revision. Current Anthropology 31: 489–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/203890 Google Scholar