Skip to main content Accessibility help

Neither archaeology nor theory: a critique of Johnson

  • Leo S. Klejn (a1)


  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.



Hide All
Bernbeck, R. 1997. Theorien in der Archäologie. Tübingen & Basel: Francke.
Binford, L.R. & Binford, S.R. 1968. Archaological theory and method, in Binford, L.R. & Binford, S.R. (ed.) New perspectives in archaeology: 13. Chicago: Aldine.
Boivin, N. 1997. Insidious or just boring? An examination of academic writing in archaeology. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 14 (2): 105–.
Burstöm, M. 1994. An ivory tower in archaeology? A conversation with Leo S. Klejn. Current Swedish Archaeology 2: 712.
Chadwick, A. 2003. Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflective and radical practice. Archaeological dialogues 10 (1): 97117.
Chang, K.C. 1967. Rethinking archaeology. New York: Random House.
Johnson, M.H. 1989. Conception of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 189211.
Johnson, M.H. 1993. Housing culture. London: University College London Press.
Johnson, M.H. 1996. Archaeology of capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, M.H. 1999. Archaeological theory: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Klejn, L.S. 1993a. It’s difficult to be a god (Yoffee and Sherratt’s Archaeological theory: Who sets the agenda?). Current Anthropology 34(4): 508–11.
Klejn, L.S. 1993b. To separate a centaur: On the relationship of archaeology and history in Soviet tradition. Antiquity 67 (255): 339–48.
Klejn, L.S. 1994. Prehistory and archaeology, in Kuna, M. & Venclova, N. (ed.) Whither archaeology? Papers in honour of Evžen Neustupny: 3642. Praha: Institute of archaeology.
Klejn, L.S. 1996. On archaeology theory: Who’s who in setting the agenda? Current Anthropology 37 (2): 346–48.
Klejn, L.S. 2001. Metaarchaeology (Acta Archaeologica, Kobenhavn, vol. 72:1, supplementa vol. III). Blackwell/Munksgaard.
Klejn, L.S. 2004. Vvedenie v teoreticheskuyu arkheologiyu. Metaarkheologiya [Intruduction to theoretical archaeology. Metaarchaeology (russ.)] St. Petersburg: Belveder.
Murray, T. 1995. On Klejn‘s agenda for theoretical archaeology. Current Anthropology 36 (2): 290–2.
Trigger, B.C. 1989. Hyperrelativism, responsibility, and the social sciences. Canadian Review in Sociology andAnthropology 26 (5): 776–97.
Trigger, B.C. 1990. The 1990s: North American archaeology with a human face? Antiquity 64 (245): 778–87.
Trigger, B.C. 1991. Post-Processual developments in Anglo-American archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 24 (2): 6576.
Trigger, B.C. 1995. Archaeology and the integrated circus. Critique ofAnthropology 15 (4): 319–35.
Yoffee, N. & Sherratt, A. (ed.). 1993. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Neither archaeology nor theory: a critique of Johnson

  • Leo S. Klejn (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed