Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Neither archaeology nor theory: a critique of Johnson

  • Leo S. Klejn (a1)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bernbeck, R. 1997. Theorien in der Archäologie. Tübingen & Basel: Francke.
Binford, L.R. & Binford, S.R. 1968. Archaological theory and method, in Binford, L.R. & Binford, S.R. (ed.) New perspectives in archaeology: 13. Chicago: Aldine.
Boivin, N. 1997. Insidious or just boring? An examination of academic writing in archaeology. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 14 (2): 105–.
Burstöm, M. 1994. An ivory tower in archaeology? A conversation with Leo S. Klejn. Current Swedish Archaeology 2: 712.
Chadwick, A. 2003. Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflective and radical practice. Archaeological dialogues 10 (1): 97117.
Chang, K.C. 1967. Rethinking archaeology. New York: Random House.
Johnson, M.H. 1989. Conception of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 189211.
Johnson, M.H. 1993. Housing culture. London: University College London Press.
Johnson, M.H. 1996. Archaeology of capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Johnson, M.H. 1999. Archaeological theory: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Klejn, L.S. 1993a. It’s difficult to be a god (Yoffee and Sherratt’s Archaeological theory: Who sets the agenda?). Current Anthropology 34(4): 508–11.
Klejn, L.S. 1993b. To separate a centaur: On the relationship of archaeology and history in Soviet tradition. Antiquity 67 (255): 339–48.
Klejn, L.S. 1994. Prehistory and archaeology, in Kuna, M. & Venclova, N. (ed.) Whither archaeology? Papers in honour of Evžen Neustupny: 3642. Praha: Institute of archaeology.
Klejn, L.S. 1996. On archaeology theory: Who’s who in setting the agenda? Current Anthropology 37 (2): 346–48.
Klejn, L.S. 2001. Metaarchaeology (Acta Archaeologica, Kobenhavn, vol. 72:1, supplementa vol. III). Blackwell/Munksgaard.
Klejn, L.S. 2004. Vvedenie v teoreticheskuyu arkheologiyu. Metaarkheologiya [Intruduction to theoretical archaeology. Metaarchaeology (russ.)] St. Petersburg: Belveder.
Murray, T. 1995. On Klejn‘s agenda for theoretical archaeology. Current Anthropology 36 (2): 290–2.
Trigger, B.C. 1989. Hyperrelativism, responsibility, and the social sciences. Canadian Review in Sociology andAnthropology 26 (5): 776–97.
Trigger, B.C. 1990. The 1990s: North American archaeology with a human face? Antiquity 64 (245): 778–87.
Trigger, B.C. 1991. Post-Processual developments in Anglo-American archaeology. Norwegian Archaeological Review 24 (2): 6576.
Trigger, B.C. 1995. Archaeology and the integrated circus. Critique ofAnthropology 15 (4): 319–35.
Yoffee, N. & Sherratt, A. (ed.). 1993. Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Neither archaeology nor theory: a critique of Johnson

  • Leo S. Klejn (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed