Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:21:37.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deposition practices in Iron Age France: new light on old discoveries

Review products

JeanGuilaine, LaurentCarozza, DominiqueGarcia, JeanGascó, ThierryJanin & BenoîtMille (with the collaboration of Gilberto Artioli & Stéphane Verger). Launac et le Launacien. Dépôts de bronzes protohistoriques du sud de la Gaule. 2017. Montpellier: Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée; 978-2-36781-213-7 hardback €32.

LaurentOlivier (ed.). Autopsie d'une tombe gauloise. La tombe à char de La Gorge-Meillet à Somme-Tourbe (Marne) (Cahiers du Musée d'Archéologie Nationale 2). 2016. Saint-Germain-en-Laye: Musée d'Archéologie Nationale; 978-2-9532428-1-2 paperback €35.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2018

Manuel Fernández-Götz*
Affiliation:
School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, William Robertson Wing, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK (Email: m.fernandez-gotz@ed.ac.uk)

Extract

Dealing with information coming from nineteenth-century discoveries is not always an easy task for archaeologists, and it can prove particularly problematic for iconic findings that have come to characterise entire periods or cultural horizons. Information is very often fragmentary, and in most cases, field methods and recording techniques are not up to present-day standards. A careful re-examination of old collections can, however, often be as fruitful as new findings. This is exemplified by the volumes under review here, which reassess two of the most important archaeological discoveries made in the late nineteenth-century in France: the bronze hoard of Launac in Languedoc and the grave of La Gorge-Meillet in Champagne. In addition to summarising existing knowledge, the volumes also provide new information coming from modern scientific analysis, as well as re-evaluations of certain find categories.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardelli, G. (ed.). 2017. Das Prunkgrab von Bad Dürkheim 150 Jahre nach der Entdeckung (Monographien des RGZM 137). Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum.Google Scholar
Dubuis, B., Josset, D., Millet, E. & Villenave, C.. 2015. La tombe princière du Ve siècle avant notre ère de Lavau ‘ZAC du Moutotʼ (Aube). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 112: 371–74.Google Scholar
Egg, M. (ed.). 2013. Die hallstattzeitlichen Fürstengräber von Kleinklein in der Steiermark: der Kröllkogel (Monographien des RGZM 110). Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum.Google Scholar
Vatan, A. 2004. Histoire de l'archéologie celtique en Champagne. Des origines à nos jours. (Bulletin de la Société archéologique champenoise, Mémoire 17). Reims: Société Archéologique Champenoise.Google Scholar
Verger, S. 2003. Des objets gaulois dans les sanctuaires archaïques de Grèce, de Sicile et d'Italie. Comptes rendus des séances de l‘Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres Année 147: 525–73.Google Scholar
Verger, S. & Pernet, L. (ed.). 2013. Une odyssée gauloise. Parures de femmes à l'origine des premiers échanges entre la Grèce et la Gaule. Arles: Éditions Errance.Google Scholar