Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:06:24.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cut not smashed: a new type of evidence for nut exploitation from Sulawesi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Victor Paz*
Affiliation:
Archaeological Studies Program, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines

Extract

In archaeology the recovery of ‘nuts’ means the recovery of any hard-shelled fruit or seeds, further qualified as those eaten by people. Recent analysis of environmental samples from Leang Burung-1 in the Maros district of Sulawesi (FIGURE 1) led to the recovery of a charred, almost intact nut, in deposits with an age range of 1430±600 BC (ANU-390) (Bulbeck 1997; Mulvaney & Soejono 1970).

The nut has a clear cut mark starting from the tapered end, running along the long axis. The cut was established as an incision and not a taphonomic feature based on observations under light microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy, where the cut could be seen scraping the outer tissue (FIGURE 2). The cut was probably made before charring, using a sharp tool to cut deep enough for the instrunent to pry open one of the locules to get to one of three kernels. Based on the associated materials recovered from the site, the cut probably was made using one of several flaked tool types recovered from the area, such as a levallois point — part of the Maros region blade assemblage (FIGURE 3).

Type
News & Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellwood, P.G, Nitthaminoto, G. Irwin, G., Gunadi, A. Waluyo & Tanudkjo, D. 1998. 35,000 years of prehistory in the northern Moluccas, in Bartstra, G.-T (ed,). Bird’s Head Approaches: Irian Jaya studies – a program for interdisciplinary research 15: Modern quaternary research in Southeast Asia: 23373. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Bulbeck, D.F. 1997. The Bronze-Iron Age of South Sulawesi, Indonesia: mortuary traditions, metallurgy and trade, in Bernard, N. (ed.), Ancient Chinese and Southeast Asian Bronze Age cultures 2:100776. Taipei: SMC Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Burkill, I.H. 1966. A dictionary of the economic products of the Malay Peninsula 12. Singapore: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Glover, I.C. 1977, The late stone age in eastern Indonesia, World Archaeology 9: 4261.Google Scholar
Kiple, K.F. & Ornelas, K.C. (ed.). 2000. The Cambridge world history of food 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. & Gosden, C. 1997. Plant remains from waterlogged sites in the Arawe Islands, West New Britain province, Papua New Guinea: implications for the history of plant use and domestication, Economic Botany 51:12133.Google Scholar
Menninger, E.A. 1977. Edible nuts of the world. Stuart (FL): Horticultural Books Inc.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, D.J., & Soejono, R.P. 1970. Archaeology in Sulawesi, Indonesia, Antiquity. 2633.Google Scholar
Paz, V.J. 2001. Archaeobotany and cultural transformation: patterns of early plant utilisation in Northern Wallacea. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar