Skip to main content Accessibility help

Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology

  • Alfredo González-Ruibal (a1), Pablo Alonso González (a2) and Felipe Criado-Boado (a1)


From Brazil to the United Kingdom, 2016 was a critical year in global politics. Heritage, ethics and the way that archaeologists relate to the public were and will all be affected, and it is time to reflect critically on the phenomenon of ‘reactionary populism’ and how it affects the practice and theory of archaeology. ‘Reactionary populism’ can be defined as a political form that is anti-liberal in terms of identity politics (e.g. multiculturalism, abortion rights, minority rights, religious freedom), but liberal in economic policies. It is characterised by nationalism, racism and anti-intellectualism, and as Judith Butler states in a recent interview, it wants “to restore an earlier state of society, driven by nostalgia or a perceived loss of privilege” (Soloveitchik 2016). Our intention here is to argue that the liberal, multi-vocal model of the social sciences and the humanities is no longer a viable option. Instead, we ask our colleagues to embrace an archaeology that is ready to intervene in wider public debates not limited to issues of heritage or of local relevance, is not afraid of defending its expert knowledge in the public arena, and is committed to reflective, critical teaching.


Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence (Email:


Hide All
ACHS Association of the Critical Heritage Studies. n.d. Available at: (accessed 24 October 2017).
Alonso González, P. 2016. Between certainty and trust: boundary-work and the construction of archaeological epistemic authority. Cultural Sociology 10: 483501.
Angelbeck, B. & Grier, C.. 2012. Anarchism and the archaeology of anarchic societies: resistance to centralization in the Coast Salish region of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Current Anthropology 53: 547–87.
Atalay, S., Clauss, L.R., McGuire, R.H. & Welch, J.R. (ed.). 2014. Transforming archaeology: activist practices and prospects. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.
Bartoy, K.M. 2012. Teaching through rather than about: education in the context of public archaeology, in Skeates, R., McDavid, C. & Carman, J. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of public archaeology: 552–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brass, T. 2017. Who these days is not a subaltern? The populist drift of global labor history. Science & Society 81: 1034.
Cleary, K., Frolík, J., Krekovič, E., Parga-Dans, E. & Prokopiou, E.S.. 2014. Responding to the financial crisis in five European countries: people, roles, reactions and initiatives in archaeology. Archaeologies 10: 211–31.
Criado-Boado, F. 2001. Problems, functions and conditions of archaeological knowledge. Journal of Social Archaeology 1: 126–46.
Dauvé, G. 2009. Contribution à la critique de l'autonomie politique. Lettre de Troploin 9: 145.
El Mundo. 2016. Pokémon Go dinamiza los museos. 5 September 2016. Available at: (accessed 23 October 2017).
Fowles, S. 2016. The perfect subject. Journal of Material Culture 21: 927.
Fraser, N. 2017. The end of progressive neoliberalism. Dissent, 2 January 2017. Available at: (accessed 23 October 2017).
Gnecco, C. 2015. An entanglement of sorts: archaeology, ethics, praxis, multiculturalism, in Gnecco, C. (ed.) Ethics and archaeological praxis: 117. New York: Springer.
González-Ruibal, A. (ed.). 2013. Reclaiming archaeology: beyond the tropes of modernity. London: Routledge.
Gramsci, A. 2011. Prison notebooks. Volume 3. New York: Columbia University Press.
Grosfoguel, R. 2008. Transmodernity, border thinking and global coloniality. Decolonizing political economy and postcolonial studies. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 80: 115–47.
Guldi, J. & Armitage, D.. 2014. The history manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, M. & Bombardella, P.. 2005. Las Vegas in Africa. Journal of Social Archaeology 5: 524.
Hamilakis, Y. 2011. Archaeological ethnography: a multitemporal meeting ground for archaeology and anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 399414.
Harrison, R. 2013. Heritage: critical approaches. London: Routledge.
Holtorf, C. 2007. Can you hear me at the back? Archaeology, communication and society. European Journal of Archaeology 10 (2–3): 149–65.
Hutchings, R. & La Salle, M.. 2015. Archaeology as disaster capitalism. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19: 699720.
Latour, B. 2013. An inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Lowenthal, D. 1996. Possessed by the past: the heritage crusade and the spoils of history. New York: Free Press.
McGuire, R. 2008. Archaeology as political action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Merriman, N. (ed.). 2004. Public archaeology. London: Routledge.
Pluciennik, M. 2015. Authoritative and ethical voices. From diktat to the demotic, in Dyke, R. Van & Bernbeck, R. (ed.) Subjects and narratives in archaeology: 5582. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
Schlanger, N. & Aitchison, K. (ed.). 2010. Archaeology and the global economic crisis: multiple impacts, possible solutions. Tervuren: Culture Lab.
Shepherd, N. & Haber, A.. 2011. What's up with WAC? Archaeology and ‘engagement’ in a globalized world. Public Archaeology 10 (2): 96115.
Sloterdijk, P. 2001. El desprecio de las masas: ensayos sobre las luchas culturales de la sociedad moderna. Valencia: Pre-textos.
Smith, C. & Wobst, H.M. (ed.). 2004. Indigenous archaeologies: decolonising theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Smith, L. 2006. Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.
Soloveitchik, R. 2016. Judith Butler: ‘Trump is emancipating unbridled hatred’. Zeit Online, 28 October 2016. Available at: (accessed 23 October 2017).
Spivak, G.C. 1988. Can the subaltern speak?, in Williams, P. & Chrisman, L. (ed.) Colonial and postcolonial theory: 271313. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Trigger, B.G. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waterton, E. & Smith, L.. 2010. The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies 16 (1–2): 415.
Winter, T. 2013. Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies 19: 532–45.
Žižek, S. 2002. A plea for Leninist intolerance. Critical Inquiry 28 (2): 542–66.


Against reactionary populism: towards a new public archaeology

  • Alfredo González-Ruibal (a1), Pablo Alonso González (a2) and Felipe Criado-Boado (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.